In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

AASCAR

CaptplaidCaptplaid Member Posts: 20,298 ✭✭✭
edited April 2014 in General Discussion
NASCAR just isn't that fun to watch anymore. The car bodies are all the same. They look stupid with no rear deck. At least they got rid of the front spoiler.

Richmond used to be enjoyable when cars ran different differentials and transmissions. One guy ran high and another car was setup to run low.

Standardized differentials, transmissions, shocks, tires, bodies. I try to enjoy it, but it's not fun anymore.

It's boring. FOX tries to hype it up, but it's not the same.

Why not just have all the cars built in one big AASCAR shop.
«1

Comments

  • xxx97xxx97 Member Posts: 5,721
    edited November -1
    Can't be much of a race with basically the same setup/hp/tires...look what there doing to football...[:(]
  • e8gme8gm Member Posts: 1,277 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The only Nascar race I ever attended was at Richmond. What a waste of 4 hrs. Lots of noise, heat, and smells. Rowdy * fans.

    Look... they're makin a left turn....they're makin another left turn.
  • Ditch-RunnerDitch-Runner Member Posts: 25,375 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I use to watch NASCAR religiously , but gave a years ago, its now about sponsors and big money which from my understanding is fading quick . Just look at the stands at the empty seats . too many rules only a handful of teams with multiple cars in the chase . they might as well just have the teams show up at the track pay a fee draw numbers to a group of hertz rental cars and have at it about as exciting
  • westernMDhunterwesternMDhunter Member Posts: 2,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I used to watch it every weekend from green flag to checker flag. Now it is too boring to watch for more than a couple minutes.
  • EVILDR235EVILDR235 Member Posts: 4,398 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    One can only watch Danica crash so many times and unless she has a wardrobe failure,it's boring

    XXXXXX
  • pwilliepwillie Member Posts: 20,253 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by DITCH-RUNNER
    I use to watch NASCAR religiously , but gave a years ago, its now about sponsors and big money which from my understanding is fading quick . Just look at the stands at the empty seats . too many rules only a handful of teams with multiple cars in the chase . they might as well just have the teams show up at the track pay a fee draw numbers to a group of hertz rental cars and have at it about as exciting

    Very good analogy....60's-70's was best racing...Its more like a drama contest than auto racing..
  • Bubba Jr.Bubba Jr. Member Posts: 8,303 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I totally quit caring about Nascar when King Richard retired. [|)]
  • discusdaddiscusdad Member Posts: 11,427 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    the ending was just fine. lots of bumping and rubbing, pointing fingers and tempers flaring, marking marks in the payback notebook..... all the laps up to that sucked.
  • discusdaddiscusdad Member Posts: 11,427 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • RocklobsterRocklobster Member Posts: 7,060
    edited November -1
    Bruton Smith has changed it from racing to an entertainment show. There's no more hungry drivers, nobody left whose entire focus is on racing. Hell, Dale Earnhardt Junior is too busy selling blue jeans and health insurance to race. He's never had to work for a thing. All the rest are the same - a bunch of mediocre nobodies in identical cars.

    It hurts my heart - I started following racing in the 60's, saw lots of fender-banging fun for many years. Watched all the greats come and go. Watched Bobby Allison tear the entire front-stretch fence down at Atlanta. Was in the stands while Richard Petty and Cale Yarborough banged fenders crossing the finish line at Daytona for Petty's 200th win. Was sitting in just about the same place when Dale Earnhardt died. Racing died soon after.

    Bummer.
  • woodhogwoodhog Member Posts: 13,115 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    not really a fan, but it would make sense if all the cars and stuff is the same, then its really all about the drivers, best one should win,right?
  • ChrisInTempeChrisInTempe Member Posts: 15,562
    edited November -1
    So here's the deal, way too much racing is all about this sort of track:

    Dover_International_Speedway.PNG


    Instead of tracks that look like these:

    800px-Road_America.svg.png

    450px-Watkins_Glen_International_Track_Map.svg.png

    800px-Infineon_%28Sears_Point%29_with_emphasis_on_NASCAR_track.svg.png

    800px-Infineon_%28Sears_Point%29_with_emphasis_on_Long_track.svg.png



    Show me some racing that's drivers on challenging courses, in cars with different approaches to what will work best and I'll get interested again. I used to be interested. In my teens I helped my eldest brother race stock cars. Strictly circle track, dirt track small time stuff. Loads of fun though, even just as a pit crew helper.

    NASCAR looks like millions of dollars on duplicate cars running in an oval. The sense of "I just saw this already!" is running on constant repeat in my head every moment I try to watch it.

    Hell with that stuff.

    At least some lady race car drivers out there break up the monotony by posing in bikinis. That sort of thing is about all that's left of the sport that's interesting.

    From a purely caveman, oogling boobies sort of viewpoint you understand ... [:p][}:)]
  • Sig220_Ruger77Sig220_Ruger77 Member Posts: 12,754 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Road America...my favorite track! I have been going to the Nationwide weekend 4 of the 5 years they have raced there. I have gotten to watch the NASCAR Nationwide, Rolex, IMSA, and a couple other series race there. What an awesome time at an awesome track! [8D]

    Jon
  • LaidbackDanLaidbackDan Member Posts: 13,142 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Still would be more interesting if half turned to the left and half turned to the right on a oval track
  • 11b6r11b6r Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Friday nite, local track. No big sponsors (unless you count Ace Plumbing or Jones Excavating), 4-6 different races each night. Grand Nationals, Modifieds, Late Models, Legends, and drivers that built their own cars.

    After the race, they open the gates to the infield, so you can go have a beer with the drivers, they'll let your grandkids sit in the seat, and you can help them push their car into the transporter.

    And they actually have a swing set for the kids, decent food at the concession stand, and admission is $5 for seniors and military.

    What a deal.
  • 11BravoCrunchie11BravoCrunchie Member Posts: 33,423 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
    So here's the deal, way too much racing is all about this sort of track:




    Instead of tracks that look like these:





    Show me some racing that's drivers on challenging courses, in cars with different approaches to what will work best and I'll get interested again. I used to be interested. In my teens I helped my eldest brother race stock cars. Strictly circle track, dirt track small time stuff. Loads of fun though, even just as a pit crew helper.

    NASCAR looks like millions of dollars on duplicate cars running in an oval. The sense of "I just saw this already!" is running on constant repeat in my head every moment I try to watch it.

    Hell with that stuff.

    At least some lady race car drivers out there break up the monotony by posing in bikinis. That sort of thing is about all that's left of the sport that's interesting.

    From a purely caveman, oogling boobies sort of viewpoint you understand ... [:p][}:)]






    I'm with you, Chris. I wish Formula 1 and MotoGP were more readily available in the US.

    You want to watch some intense racing? MotoGP is where it's at! 1000cc sport bikes with professional riders on a closed course...they're taking some corners at 100+ mph while hanging off the side of the bike and dragging an elbow, with their faces mere inches from the ground, and racing (sometimes) less than a foot away from other drivers doing the same thing.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4snkUUolJ0
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,529 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Richmond race last night had a very exciting finish. Even fist a cuffs behind the pits.Great race
  • pulsarncpulsarnc Member Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I too grew up watching Nascar in the 60s and 70s ,Great drivers and great tracks. Now it is a cookie cutter type car And track .Bring back purely stock cars like from the old dayss and a return to Rockingham etc.
    cry Havoc and let slip  the dogs of war..... 
  • drobsdrobs Member Posts: 22,620 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'll take this over Nascar any day:
    luca-oil-off-road-racing-trucks.jpg
  • RocklobsterRocklobster Member Posts: 7,060
    edited November -1
    I tried getting into European-style racing for awhile; hard to keep up with it, though. At those big, technical tracks you can only see a bit of the action at a time. Very little head-to-head combat. You walk around to different sectors, then stand and watch as one of the little cars comes zzziiinnnggg-ing by every few seconds. Same 2 or 3 teams win each time in a given season.

    42 full-bodied 4000 lb stock cars going into a 30 degree banked turn at 200+ mph six inches apart, tires smoking, sparks flying from sheet metal, big V8's screaming was pretty exciting. Racing full-tilt into the pits, burning rubber back out. Racing to the caution flags. No unnecessarily convoluted points system that nobody can understand. The fastest car with the ballsiest driver winning - no multiple lead-car-block-car teams.

    Back when racing was racing.
  • JustCJustC Member Posts: 16,056 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Rocklobster
    I tried getting into European-style racing for awhile; hard to keep up with it, though. At those big, technical tracks you can only see a bit of the action at a time. Very little head-to-head combat. You walk around to different sectors, then stand and watch as one of the little cars comes zzziiinnnggg-ing by every few seconds. Same 2 or 3 teams win each time in a given season.

    42 full-bodied 4000 lb stock cars going into a 30 degree banked turn at 200+ mph six inches apart, tires smoking, sparks flying from sheet metal, big V8's screaming was pretty exciting. Racing full-tilt into the pits, burning rubber back out. Racing to the caution flags. No unnecessarily convoluted points system that nobody can understand. The fastest car with the ballsiest driver winning - no multiple lead-car-block-car teams.

    Back when racing was racing.


    not to mention, how can you be a fan of some "guy" who drinks milk when he wins a race where the cars can't touch each other. Open wheel drivers are never any good in nascar, but nascar drivers have finished much higher in open wheel than the opposite. There is something about having to control a 3500lb out of control brick, versus a car that was designed by scientists that even a GIRL could drive. I have watched them run in person, and they are un-impressive. A car that is designed to stick itself to the track is a whole different science than a car that is trying to PUSH itself into the wall the entire time you are driving it.
  • 11BravoCrunchie11BravoCrunchie Member Posts: 33,423 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by JustC
    quote:Originally posted by Rocklobster
    I tried getting into European-style racing for awhile; hard to keep up with it, though. At those big, technical tracks you can only see a bit of the action at a time. Very little head-to-head combat. You walk around to different sectors, then stand and watch as one of the little cars comes zzziiinnnggg-ing by every few seconds. Same 2 or 3 teams win each time in a given season.

    42 full-bodied 4000 lb stock cars going into a 30 degree banked turn at 200+ mph six inches apart, tires smoking, sparks flying from sheet metal, big V8's screaming was pretty exciting. Racing full-tilt into the pits, burning rubber back out. Racing to the caution flags. No unnecessarily convoluted points system that nobody can understand. The fastest car with the ballsiest driver winning - no multiple lead-car-block-car teams.

    Back when racing was racing.


    not to mention, how can you be a fan of some "guy" who drinks milk when he wins a race where the cars can't touch each other. Open wheel drivers are never any good in nascar, but nascar drivers have finished much higher in open wheel than the opposite. There is something about having to control a 3500lb out of control brick, versus a car that was designed by scientists that even a GIRL could drive. I have watched them run in person, and they are un-impressive. A car that is designed to stick itself to the track is a whole different science than a car that is trying to PUSH itself into the wall the entire time you are driving it.





    Yes, but those open-cockpit cars have their own quirks, as well. Like, in order to keep heat in the tires, and maintain enough grip to actually make it through the corner without spinning out, you have to maintain extremely high speeds, and the human brain has trouble coping with the knowledge that you have to go through that corner at more than 90 mph, or else you die.

    F1 drivers are also subject to extremely high lateral g-forces due to the high cornering speed, so much so that they need to be extremely physically fit. And due to the small cockpit of an F1 car, the drivers are generally not very large in stature.

    The way F1 cars are designed, without enough air flowing over the car, they weigh less than 1000 lbs, and are uncontrollable (too light). They need that air flow to generate the downforce necessary to give the tires traction.

    Also, the engines on F1 cars have such tight mechanical tolerances that when they're cold, they're practically seized up. They have to be warmed up "intravenously" by external pumps and heaters before they can be started.

    F1 is the pinnacle of automotive technology, and it filters down from there through companies like Ferrari, McLaren, Lotus, Mercedes, and Honda (companies that build part or all of an F1 car) into production vehicles as the technology to implement it in large scale becomes less expensive.
  • 1BigGuy1BigGuy Member Posts: 4,033 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I prefer Figure 8 racing. [}:)]
  • footlongfootlong Member Posts: 8,009
    edited November -1
    l doubt the "BIG 4" learn much from SlotCar to improve their production cars.. NOT like in years past
  • footlongfootlong Member Posts: 8,009
    edited November -1
    l used to go to Darlington as a kid with Philip Livingston and his Dad..Mr Livingston was licensed by NasCar and he was a competitor in the Convertible Races class they had back in the early 60s. l remember Philips' Dad Getting his White 1962 Ford Galaxie convertible from Paul Motor Company in Charleston.. 406 cubic inches. 385 horsepower. 4speed transmission..l remembering Phillip driving it around before they made a race car of it. They took out the top hardware,heater,headlites,installed a roll bar,had the car lettered, and that was about it.. We put the car on the trailer, behind a stake boy truck w/tires tools, an it was off to Darlington... lmagine.. A REAL stock car [:0]
  • Queen of SwordsQueen of Swords Member Posts: 14,355
    edited November -1
    We returned yesterday from our trip to Richmond for the races. Hot passes and VIP treatment, thanks to Loyd's cousin, pit passes, ride in the pace car, driver's meeting, got to personally wish the driver's "good luck" before the race (Joey Longano was the only driver to say, "Thank you, ma'am"),Victory Lane, and etc. It was the experience of a lifetime.

    Virginians, you live in some beautiful country, and everyone we met was very congenial.
  • Smitty500magSmitty500mag Member Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    How soon we forget. Back in the early days only teams like the Petty's could afford to race full time because other drivers and team members had to go to work on Monday. It wasn't unusual for the big boys with all the money to win a race by lapping the field a couple of times which made watching the races boring which is the reason NASCAR tried to even up the competition with cookie cutter cars. Now instead of watching the race with the likes of Petty or the Wood Brothers 2 or 3 laps ahead of everybody the race is bunched up with cars that run basically the same. Which is still boring until about the last 10 laps.
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,529 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dennisnielsen
    Need some cheese with your whine?

    Just turn your TV to the obama channel if you want a legitimatly complain about something no one likes.


    Zing
  • LesWVaLesWVa Member Posts: 10,490 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Smitty500mag
    Which is still boring until about the last 10 laps.

    They cant even make the last ten laps interesting now days. All they do now is see how many times they can restart a race under a "Green/White/Checkered flag".

    These three things are what makes it to boring for me to watch.

    052710-NASCAR-FOX-booth-team-PI_20100527132809_660_320.JPG
  • CaptplaidCaptplaid Member Posts: 20,298 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The Waltrip hype is annoying.
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,529 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Captplaid
    The Waltrip hype is annoying.


    Darrell is a great guy. [^]
  • SwanKongSwanKong Member Posts: 989 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Group-C-at-Le-Mans.jpg

    909223d1334737640-am-i-only-one-likes-group-c-cars-porsche_962_198491-1280x960.jpg

    Group C, need I say more?
  • RocklobsterRocklobster Member Posts: 7,060
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by LesWVa
    quote:Originally posted by Smitty500mag
    Which is still boring until about the last 10 laps.

    They cant even make the last ten laps interesting now days. All they do now is see how many times they can restart a race under a "Green/White/Checkered flag".

    These three things are what makes it to boring for me to watch.

    052710-NASCAR-FOX-booth-team-PI_20100527132809_660_320.JPG





    The multi-car teams NEVER allow the race to run the last few laps without a caution. They want the field to bunch up so that they can block any other possible contenders from outrunning their lead car of the week.
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,529 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Did you notice a Toyoto didn't win their Toyoto 400 race?
  • LesWVaLesWVa Member Posts: 10,490 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by select-fire
    Did you notice a Toyoto didn't win their Toyoto 400 race?


    What day will the GM Anything be held on?
  • discusdaddiscusdad Member Posts: 11,427 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I never missed a USAC dirt track race at DuQoin Illinois Mile track. P jones, Foyt Bettenhausen, even Andretti came to the Magic mile back in the late 60s and early 70s.
  • Bill JordanBill Jordan Member Posts: 1,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Then there is Larry McRenolds.................."Nuf said.

    sounds like his lug nuts are caoght in the ttunk lid
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,529 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by LesWVa
    quote:Originally posted by select-fire
    Did you notice a Toyoto didn't win their Toyoto 400 race?


    What day will the GM Anything be held on?


    Easy Answer.. Every Year at Daytona 500. They race to see their name on the Harley Earl Trophy.
  • JustCJustC Member Posts: 16,056 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Viktor
    quote:Originally posted by JustC
    quote:Originally posted by Rocklobster
    I tried getting into European-style racing for awhile; hard to keep up with it, though. At those big, technical tracks you can only see a bit of the action at a time. Very little head-to-head combat. You walk around to different sectors, then stand and watch as one of the little cars comes zzziiinnnggg-ing by every few seconds. Same 2 or 3 teams win each time in a given season.

    42 full-bodied 4000 lb stock cars going into a 30 degree banked turn at 200+ mph six inches apart, tires smoking, sparks flying from sheet metal, big V8's screaming was pretty exciting. Racing full-tilt into the pits, burning rubber back out. Racing to the caution flags. No unnecessarily convoluted points system that nobody can understand. The fastest car with the ballsiest driver winning - no multiple lead-car-block-car teams.

    Back when racing was racing.


    not to mention, how can you be a fan of some "guy" who drinks milk when he wins a race where the cars can't touch each other. Open wheel drivers are never any good in nascar, but nascar drivers have finished much higher in open wheel than the opposite. There is something about having to control a 3500lb out of control brick, versus a car that was designed by scientists that even a GIRL could drive. I have watched them run in person, and they are un-impressive. A car that is designed to stick itself to the track is a whole different science than a car that is trying to PUSH itself into the wall the entire time you are driving it.





    Yes, but those open-cockpit cars have their own quirks, as well. Like, in order to keep heat in the tires, and maintain enough grip to actually make it through the corner without spinning out, you have to maintain extremely high speeds, and the human brain has trouble coping with the knowledge that you have to go through that corner at more than 90 mph, or else you die.

    F1 drivers are also subject to extremely high lateral g-forces due to the high cornering speed, so much so that they need to be extremely physically fit. And due to the small cockpit of an F1 car, the drivers are generally not very large in stature.

    The way F1 cars are designed, without enough air flowing over the car, they weigh less than 1000 lbs, and are uncontrollable (too light). They need that air flow to generate the downforce necessary to give the tires traction.

    Also, the engines on F1 cars have such tight mechanical tolerances that when they're cold, they're practically seized up. They have to be warmed up "intravenously" by external pumps and heaters before they can be started.

    F1 is the pinnacle of automotive technology, and it filters down from there through companies like Ferrari, McLaren, Lotus, Mercedes, and Honda (companies that build part or all of an F1 car) into production vehicles as the technology to implement it in large scale becomes less expensive.


    WELL DUHHH that's called racing when you have to maintain speed.

    They are no more in shape than NASCAR drivers, and by your own admission, I little more girly and small.

    Anyone who can't make 100mph is a loser who doesn't belong behind the wheel of any race car.

    and NASCAR motors are producing 950hp, from old school small block engines. Anyone can take technology and bolt it together,....it takes a real racer to create that kind of horsepower from an engine design that was introduced decades ago.

    ohhh, and when they win or lose, they fight like men. They don't drink milk like a queeeeeeerr
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,437 ******
    edited November -1
    A simple figure 8 would be enough to make Nascar entertaining.
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
Sign In or Register to comment.