In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

"Spray-fire" described by VPC!

daddodaddo Member Posts: 3,408
edited August 2003 in General Discussion
These people are ignorant. I've never seen a semi-auto capable of "spray-fire". Read and be amazed!
http://www.vpc.org/press/0305hose.htm

Comments

  • FrancFFrancF Member Posts: 35,279 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Funny that spew from the VPC, sounds like that last troll we had here
    Hmmmmmm [?]

    hsas157x100.gif
    gun1.gif



    "I know Everything because
    my Wife is a Hair Stylist"
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    For what ever good it will do, I sent them an e-mail stating semiautomatics are limited to 10 rounds. Some revolvers will hold ten rounds. And the revolver will shoot the same bullet just as far and just as fast as that scary semiautomatic. And with a speed loader the revolver can be reloaded just as fast.

    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
  • daddodaddo Member Posts: 3,408
    edited November -1
    And talking of "assault weapons"- I bet I could assault anyone with a bb-gun. Would that make it an assault weapon. These definitions are getting out of hand!
  • redcedarsredcedars Member Posts: 919 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    tr, you have just described the argument they will use next, against revolvers.

    There is no reasoning with irrational fanatics. Don't waste your time. Like my Aunt Rose used to say, "Never argy with a fool, makes it too hard for folks to tell which one is which."

    redcedars
  • competentonecompetentone Member Posts: 4,696 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    You guys are missing the whole point; read what they're saying:

    "... fully automatic fire has little to do with the killing power of assault weapons..."

    "...in fact, military and civilian experts agree that semiautomatic fire is actually more-not less-likely to hit the target than is automatic fire, and is thus more deadly."

    "And even if automatic fire were more deadly, many semiautomatic assault weapons not only can be converted to automatic fire with home tools and modest skill, but readily available books and videos walk the would-be converter through the process."

    http://www.vpc.org/studies/hosesix.htm

    "...civilian semiautomatic assault weapons are no less deadly than military automatic assault weapons. In fact, they are arguably even more deadly."

    http://www.vpc.org/studies/hosetwo.htm

    With that sort of argument--that full-autos are not any more deadly than semi-autos; infact, they're SAFER--being presented by even the "anti-gun" people, I'd like someone to tell me why we are continuing with the clearly meaningless ban on full-auto weapons?

    Based upon the VPC's argument, we could lift the ban on new manufacture, remove the tax and paperwork on full autos--making them as easy to get as semi-autos--AND THERE WILL BE NO CHANGE IN GUN RELATED CRIME!

    I really like the way the VPC argues!
  • IAMACLONE_2IAMACLONE_2 Member Posts: 4,725
    edited November -1
    I tried to send the witch an email searched all over cant find her.
    Heck if I could get my hands on her I would show her a bullet hose MAC-10 .45acp 1100rds min. Now thats a hose!
    Best parts is that only 1 murder was every commited with a registered
    Mac-10, and it was a cop.
    She most likley would not accept a demo, cause the are all evil.
    Dumb * Witch...Knee Jerkn...yadyada
    Walte
Sign In or Register to comment.