In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Obama Staff Leaked Hillary Email Story
allen griggs
Member Posts: 35,695 ✭✭✭✭
Obama adviser behind leak of Hillary Clinton's email scandal
By Edward KleinMarch 14, 2015 | 9:33pm NYpost.com
Modal Trigger
Obama adviser behind leak of Hillary Clinton's email scandal
It's the vast left-wing conspiracy.
Obama senior adviser Valerie Jarrett leaked to the press details of Hillary Clinton's use of a private e-mail address during her time as secretary of state, sources tell me.
But she did so through people outside the -administration, so the story couldn't be traced to her or the White House.
In addition, at Jarrett's behest, the State Department was ordered to launch a series of investigations into Hillary's conduct at Foggy Bottom, including the use of her expense account, the disbursement of funds, her contact with foreign leaders and her possible collusion with the Clinton Foundation.
Six separate probes into Hillary's performance have been -going on at the State Department. I'm told that the e-mail scandal was timed to come out just as Hillary was on the verge of formally announcing that she was running for president - and that there's more to come.
Members of Bill Clinton's camp say the former president suspects the White House is the source of the leak and is furious.
`OBAMA AND VALERIE JARRETT WILL GO TO ANY LENGTHS TO PREVENT HILLARY FROM BECOMING PRESIDENT.'
- Source
"My contacts and friends in newspapers and TV tell me that they've been contacted by the White House and offered all kinds of negative stories about us," one of Bill's friends quotes him as saying. "The Obamas are behind the e-mail story, and they're spreading rumors that I've been with women, that Hillary promoted people at the State Department who'd done favors for our foundation, that John Kerry had to clean up diplomatic messes Hillary left behind."
Then, according to this source, Bill added: "The Obamas are out to get us any way they can."
The sabotage is part of an -ongoing feud between the two Democrat powerhouses.
Last fall, during the run-up to the 2014 midterm elections, Jarrett was heard to complain bitterly that the Clintons were turning congressmen, senators, governors and grass-root party members against Obama by portraying him as an unpopular president who was an albatross around the neck of the party.
Jarrett was said to be livid that most Democrats running for election refused to be seen campaigning with the president. She blamed the Clintons for marginalizing the president and for trying to wrestle control of the Democratic Party away from Obama.
And she vowed payback.
My sources say Jarrett saw an opportunity to hit back hard when Monica Lewinsky suddenly resurfaced after years of living in obscurity. Jarrett discreetly put out word to some friendly members of the press that the White House would look with favor if they gave Monica some ink and airtime.
Relations have gotten even frostier in the past few months.
After the Democrats took a shellacking in the midterms, the White House scheduled a meeting with Hillary Clinton. When she showed up in the Oval Office, she was greeted by three people - the president, Jarrett and Michelle Obama.
With his wife and Jarrett looking on, Obama made it clear that he intended to stay neutral in the presidential primary process - a clear signal that he wouldn't mind if someone challenged Hillary for the nomination.
"Obama and Valerie Jarrett will go to any lengths to prevent Hillary from becoming president," a source close to the White House told me. "They believe that Hillary, like her husband, is left of center, not a true-blue liberal."
If she gets into the White House, they believe she will compromise with the Republicans in Congress and undo Obama's legacy.
"With Obama's approval," this source continued, "Valerie has been holding secret meetings with Martin O'Malley [the former Democratic governor of Maryland] and [Massachusetts Sen.] Elizabeth Warren. She's promised O'Malley and Warren the full support of the White House if they will challenge Hillary for the presidential nomination."
Edward Klein's most recent book is "Blood Feud: The Clintons vs. the Obamas" (Regnery).
Comments
They're going to tear each other to pieces.
The 'bama Left wants Warren. She's so extreme she'd end up being the Demo's Barry Goldwater.
Let's hope.
How many "conservatives" will fall for that idea? [}:)]
Meanwhile don't forget that Biden desperately wants the big chair and as VP he thinks HE should be the favorite and not a former first lady. No telling what he might to screw her over.
I eagerly await the Democrat primaries. Should be quite entertaining as they rip each other to shreds.
Too old to live...too young to die...
I believe the socialists honestly think Hillary if she is the nominee cannot win. Hillary has plenty of baggage and she does not appeal to younger voters.
The socialist party would much rather see someone like Biden and Warren on the ticket, therefore, I believe the socialists and sycophants in main stream media they will make every attempt to destroy Hillary early.
None of this matters if there is not a viable candidate on the Republican side. The Demos voters (including Republican) faithful will lock step behind what ever is marched out in front of them.
fixt for accuracy (and realism) [V] [xx(]
win win situation.
I hope they tear each other to pieces.
Jarrett is actually the shadow president behind her puppet Barry, and she loves the power she holds...[V]
Trinity +++
Let them beat each other into the ground. Sit back and enjoy. Now here is the problem: Who is going to lead the way on the Republican side????? Who will emerge as the next great leader that Ronald Reagan was??
Let's try to remember over the next 20 months that the most Liberal Republican is several times better than the most "Conservative" Demorat.
Reagan was wrong about gun control, but I believe he was misguided, and that he didn't want our guns confiscated or anything like that. He believed in American freedom far more than any of today's Demorats. It certainly cannot be said of the current wannabe dictator and his regime.
Remember that we will NEVER have a candidate that we agree with 100%, so we'll have to pick the best we can find WHO CAN WIN. Those last three words being very important. Barry Goldwater was a good man and would've made a great President, but he couldn't win. Let's never make that mistake again.
Right now I think the leader of the pack is Walker. The Left despises him, so I can't think of a better reason to support him. [:)]
quote:Originally posted by Oakie
Let them beat each other into the ground. Sit back and enjoy. Now here is the problem: Who is going to lead the way on the Republican side????? Who will emerge as the next great leader that Ronald Reagan was??
Let's try to remember over the next 20 months that the most Liberal Republican is several times better than the most "Conservative" Demorat.
Reagan was wrong about gun control, but I believe he was misguided, and that he didn't want our guns confiscated or anything like that. He believed in American freedom far more than any of today's Demorats. It certainly cannot be said of the current wannabe dictator and his regime.
Remember that we will NEVER have a candidate that we agree with 100%, so we'll have to pick the best we can find WHO CAN WIN. Those last three words being very important. Barry Goldwater was a good man and would've made a great President, but he couldn't win. Let's never make that mistake again.
Right now I think the leader of the pack is Walker. The Left despises him, so I can't think of a better reason to support him. [:)]
The question is not who can win, but rather who loses. If the republican national party's hand picked candidates win, individual liberty loses.
Well, that settles that!