In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Guns, Guns, Guns

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited April 2002 in General Discussion
Guns, Guns, Guns


Apr 22, 2002



In May, 2000, the Million Mom March drew a crowd of several hundred thousand to Washington's Mall. The marchers came to express their support for gun control. Coverage bordered on the reverential.

One of the purposes of the MMM was to put gun control on the national agenda. The timing came as no coincidence. That summer the parties held their nominating conventions. The election occurred in the fall.

A funny thing happened between the Million Mom March and Election Day: Guns fell off the political radar screen. Even Al Gore declined to press the issue. His campaign tried to mute liberalism's hostility to legal guns and the owners of firearms.

Nevertheless, the Democratic Party's perceived enthusiasm for gun control probably cost Gore the election. Guns explain why he lost his home state of Tennessee as well as West Virginia and Arkansas. If Gore had won just one of those three, he would not have needed Florida's electoral votes. And although Gore carried Michigan and Pennsylvania, the gun issue transformed states Democrats ought to have taken for granted into competitive venues.

Last year in Virginia, Mark Warner cultivated the pro-gun vote. Although the NRA gave higher marks to Mark Earley, the so-called gun lobby did not fire broadsides at the Democrat. The perception was that Warner was acceptable. Warner won the Ninth District, where hunters outnumber espresso sippers. National Democrats cite Warner's win as a model.

Two years ago the Million Mom March fatally wounded the Democratic Party. If organizers were to schedule a repeat for 2004, serious presidential contenders likely would ask the moms to stay home.

http://timesdispatch.com/editorials/more/MGBSA3VGB0D.html


"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Comments

  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thats all the big news stations can talk about today.
    Ill be glad when snookie or someone dies so it will dominate the news for weeks vs guns.


    Its going to be funny when all/most gun control bills fail. They will be pooing themself on live t.v.
  • thesoundguy1thesoundguy1 Member Posts: 680
    edited November -1
    Hows about a "Million Gun Owner March" on Washington???????
  • badboybobbadboybob Member Posts: 1,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hey Soundguy ya gots a gud idee. Any takers? I'll join.

    PC=BS
  • badboybobbadboybob Member Posts: 1,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    PC=BS

    Edited by - badboybob on 04/25/2002 15:19:52
  • thesoundguy1thesoundguy1 Member Posts: 680
    edited November -1
    I'm definately in.Unfortunately, we'd have march unarmed, or it be
    reported in the news that an "invasionary force" came to Washington,
    that's why the military was dispatched and a million gun-toting
    Americans were blasted to Here-after.
    I'm definately up for it, though.I feel I don't the know-how, or the
    resources to organize such an event.Perhaps, if we had simultanious
    rallies around the country, it might make it easier for us to be heard
    and seen.
  • thesoundguy1thesoundguy1 Member Posts: 680
    edited November -1
    The best way to fight political correctness bullsh*t, is to use some of the same tactics as the opponents of the 2nd ammendment.
    For example:
    Gun owners and other conservative minded people don't normally organize, and march on the U.S. Capitol, state houses etc.
    It has certainley happened, but not with the frequency that say, the
    anti-gun forces do.(Probably because most of the conservative minded
    types are busy working, and providing for their families.Isn't it
    ironic, or rather sad, that the rights of the most responsible of our society, are the most compromised?)
    Pro gun advocates need to barrow a lesson from the political correct
    handbook of "creative" speech.Create terms and phrases to get maximum, or minimal impact, depending on the usage.
    For example:
    PRO-GUN should be PRO-SECOND AMMENDMENT.This detracts from any negative implications the word GUN has in peoples' minds.(I know this
    seems like self-censorship, but despirate times call for despirate
    measures!)
    ANTI-GUNNER should be substituted with RAPE ENABLER.This puts a very
    ugly face on the net result of these peoples' political leanings.Terms
    like this and PRO-HOME INVASIONISTS, puts the opposition to the
    2nd ammendment, in bed with the very criminals they claim to be "protecting" us from.Particularly RAPE ENABLER, has a connotation
    of being anti-woman,the very worst thing you can accuse a liberal of.
    These other terms work in place of anti-gunner:
    PRO-CRIMINAL
    ANTI-PATRIOT
    ANTI-CONSTITUTIONIST
    PRO-MURDURERS
    NEO-COMMUNISTS
    NAZIS
    If we put our heads together,I'm sure we can come up with many more.
Sign In or Register to comment.