In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Time for a Little Rebellion

ref44ref44 Member Posts: 251 ✭✭✭
edited July 2002 in General Discussion
Pat Buchanan

July 1, 2002

Time for a little rebellion

"I hold it, that a little rebellion, now and then, is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical." So Jefferson wrote to fellow Virginian James Madison in the year Madison authored his country's Constitution.

It's past time for "a little rebellion" against federal jurists who are perverting that Constitution to make themselves petty dictators.

On June 26, a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco declared, 2 to 1, that the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States is unconstitutional, as it contains the words: "under God." When the decision becomes final, the pledge will be forbidden in every public school in Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington.

That phrase, "under God," was put into the pledge in 1954 by an act of Congress and Dwight Eisenhower. It has been recited by millions of children. Yet the court now says that it violates the First Amendment, which reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..."

What religion did Congress establish with the words "under God"? Catholicism? Methodism? The judges do not say. They only say that since "under God" is not neutral about religion, it violates separation of church and state.

Michael A. Newdow went to the court to prevent his second-grade daughter from having to recite the pledge. But since the Supreme Court ruled in 1942 that no one could be required to recite the pledge, this sounds bogus. Newdow's daughter could have remained silent.

But for this Sacramento atheist, silence is not enough. Since he is offended by "under God," no schoolchildren are to be permitted to recite the words. That was his demand. And two U.S. judges agreed that to permit the pledge is to confront his daughter "with an unacceptable choice between participating and protesting."

Thus, because one child is troubled by having to decide to stay silent or say the words "under God," no schoolchild in America can say the pledge of allegiance to the flag of their country.

Not having met Newdow, let me yet say that what he did to his daughter -- exploiting this little girl to parade his anti-God bigotry -- is revolting. She will suffer more from the taunts and insult of playmates than she would ever have by saying the pledge or remaining silent.

America is the freest country in the world. It provides for oddballs like Newdow by declaring they are not to be required to recite any pledge or prayer. But for bigots like Newdow, freedom is not enough. Their agenda is intolerance. They wish not only to be free from saying prayers and pledges they despise, they want to deny the community the right to express its patriotism and faith. The mindset is totalitarian.

The temptation is to demand that Congress impeach the two judges. But that would make them martyrs. Congress should rather re-enact that 1954 law; then, using its power to restrict court jurisdiction under Article III of the Constitution, strip from all federal courts any right to rule on the pledge of allegiance. Remove them entirely.

And as all federal courts below the Supreme Court are creations of Congress, Congress should require reconfirmation of all federal judges after eight years. This would give elected representatives of the people a way to grade the performance of unelected judges, some of whom have forgotten the meaning of judicial restraint.

As Newdow and these judges used a seven-year-old girl to impose an atheist agenda on America, Congress should seize on this outrage to drive judges back into the narrow stall set aside for them in the Constitution.

The ruling will not take effect until appeals have been heard. Attorney General Ashcroft should take the decision directly to the Supreme Court. Let us see which justices will hold that the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of the United States violates the Constitution of the United States.

Let the Supreme Court have this opportunity to strike down not only the 9th Circuit decision, but all court precedents upon which it is based, and restore the original intent of Madison and the Framers.

Should the Supreme Court uphold the 9th Circuit, the country should defy the court. Conservatives and populists should seize on this attack on faith and patriotism to restore constitutionalism to the courts and begin the overthrow of a cultural revolution that judicial dictators, appointed for life, have imposed upon us.

Yes, Mr. Jefferson, it's time for a little rebellion.

Comments

  • dads-freeholddads-freehold Member Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    greetings, altho i'm ambigious about the pharse "under god" as to the critior of establishing a religon, never the less i do respect the courage of this man to stand up and say my daughters experience counts. courage does not take the easy road because one might be ridiculed,and despised. courage does not have to be right or wrong , it only has to go where none have gone before. so if you must despise and throw your stones but ask your self are your convictions strong enough for you to stand alone. i'm reminded of the spartans at thermopoly. tho overwhelmed they stood for what they believed to the death. respt submitted dads-freehold a fronte praecipitium a tergo lupi

    rodney colson
  • NighthawkNighthawk Member Posts: 12,022 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thank God its not going to hold up the whole U.S. Goverment said no way for once I agree.

    Rugster
  • lurkerlurker Member Posts: 414 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have never been a Pat Buchanan fan, but this is one time when I absolutely agree with him ---- no one person should be able to cram their beliefs down everyone else's throats; especially this.

    I do not repect his "courage" as freehold does; I think the man's an idiot and if he and his family don't want to recite the pledge with "Under God" in it, don't. The Court ruling will be reversed, the judges will be rebuked and "Under God" will still stand.

    I'm sure he doesn't have any problem spending US money, which has "In God We Trust" plainly printed on the back of the bill.

    If he still doesn't like that, move to another country!
  • Bushy ARBushy AR Member Posts: 564 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Lurker...I agree that "under God" should stay a part of both our oaths and money.However,did you know that those words "under God" were the result of a anti-communist campaign by the Knights of Columbus,an organization of people who are of a faith that some people,even on this board,concider a "cult"? And can you tell me when and why "In God We Trust" was added to our money? It may surprise some people when they learn that our money did not originally have those words.If I am not mistaken it was added around 1863...the same time our country was locked in a conflict which would change it forever.

    Little people talk about people,regular people talk about things,and big people talk about ideas.
  • 96harley96harley Member Posts: 3,992 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Dads...
    Yes I do know what it is to take a stand. Did it last year. Stood for what I believed which is what the majority of folk here agreed with. The liberals jumped on me like a duck on junebug but they are few here. They just have large mouths and use them not only to feed their faces but to lie and spread discord.

    Our nation was founded on Godly principles. If all these people want to move into our unique American culture then take up the American culture but don't expect me to start worshipping a fat dude with a bowl in his lap or bow to some turbin headed camel jockey. Another thing, we speak English here. If you can't read the menu go fish'n but get a green card and fishing license first.
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ever wonder why the liberals attack the Constitution at any and every angle possible? I'll tell you why. The Constitution defines the LIMITATIONS of government. The Constitution is a stumbling block in the liberal path to a totalitarian society in which government controls everything.
  • dads-freeholddads-freehold Member Posts: 1,361 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    greetings, happy independance day to all, to harley96 could have put it better my self, i agree with you also on your stand(what ever it was),if people stood more for their convictions they would fall for less bs. to idsman75 also i'm in complete agreement on the constitution, but it may surprise you as it did me to find that the north vietnam has a constitution that is almost a mirror image of our, seems that uncle ho was a t. jefferson fan too. but the basic difference was in application, ho believed in theory where as we believe you must put shoes to your believes. ipray we alway will. respt submitted dads-freehold

    rodney colson
Sign In or Register to comment.