In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
watched pentagon tape..
scottm21166
Member Posts: 20,723
That tape shows nothing....they say you can see the plane? I can't and if they do it's a photoshop job. NO PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON
Comments
wrench
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/pentagon/video.html
A Boeing 757 is 155 feet long, 44.5 feet high, 125 feet wide.
With the landing gear up the lowest part of a Boeing 757 is it's engines:
Why is there only a single trail in the grass? It could not have been from the tail dragging with the nose up...airplanes climb when you do that don't they?
http://timmerca.com/document/1065/#Main
You guys are SO LAME! I can't believe it! YOU are STILL whining about a
conspiracy!???
You haven't GOT A CLUE, HAVE YOU!??
By reading my crystals I have known the entire story since day one!
The REAL ANSWER is quite simple, really. Our 'little friends' from
'out there' did it! Right after their mother ship caught that airliner,
one of the 'outrider craft' swooped down a little too low and slid
across the grass ... all the way in! Fortunately, the crew wasn't
hurt! They were able to activate their individual forcerepel fields
in the nick of time!
I've got to go now - the night nurse is making her rounds and
I've got to get back to my room!
Why is there only a single trail in the grass? It could not have been from the tail dragging with the nose up...airplanes climb when you do that don't they?
Can you really be that stupid? Why do you think they race down a 10,000 foot runway to take-off? Just lift the nose and they'll fly, right? DUH!!!!
Clouder..
Come on guys you still have not deomonstrated who was on the grassy knoll in Dealy Plaza, and now another conspiracy? Wanna by my copy of The Da Vinci Code? Inside scoop!
however...the hijackers who were on the plane have been seen alive some have been interviewed even spoken to the FBI
there is no plane in that picture. no damage that would have come from the crash of an airliner present and many witnesses report hearing other sounds thst more closely resemble a rocket or missle.
there were 89 working security cameras pointed in the direction of this crash...they release spotty video from 2 of them...what are they hiding?
the hijackers who were on the plane have been seen alive some have been interviewed even spoken to the FBI
Please post the reference - I'd like to read it!
Fascinating![:0][:0][:0]
Red,
The wings were supporting the weight of the plane, and the angle of attack was not 90 degrees, thus the engines could not have hit the ground first!!![:0]
however...the hijackers who were on the plane have been seen alive some have been interviewed even spoken to the FBI
the hijackers who were on that plane were seen alive ? so did they hijack the plane and then land it somewhere else then ? or did they NOT hijack a plane ? what about the passengers that were on the plane ? they havent been seen alive since 9-11. do you think united and american airlines are in on it ? those airplanes cost alot of money and i'm sure the pilots union would be upset to know the government is holding their memebers for a national security ploy. hmmm.....
what kind of missle was it that was fired ? who fired it ? navy ? air force ? army ? foreign military ? where was it fired from ? who would have given the order to fire it ? someone at the pentagon ? did Bush give the order ? who did he give it to ? would anyone at the pentagon fire a missle at their own headquaters ? please give me some answer...inquiring minds want to know....
so what if they only released 2 out of 89 videos. you know how they are.
it shouldn't be surprising that a 757 going at top speed sounds like a missile.
weren't there pictures of plane parts in the wreckage at the pentagon?
if it was a conspiracy by the government, using a plane or not, they wouldn't trash their own building. or maybe that's proof that it was a government conspiracy, by some agency that also doesn't like people in the pentagon.
on the other hand, I did hear that someone noticed a lack of greiving families of pilots...
there were pictures of a planes parts....not enough to make a plane a few parts is all there were...and they were the wrong parts not from a 757....type in 911 tapes youll get all the info your mind can hold
You guys crack me up! I guess all those people who witnessed this were all on drugs or lying!![:p]
Red,
The wings were supporting the weight of the plane, and the angle of attack was not 90 degrees, thus the engines could not have hit the ground first!!![:0]
they can't find two wittnesses who saw the same thing...but more importantly...they can't find one witness who can identify the object that hit the pentagon as a jet liner...the only ones who claim it was a plane referenced a lear jet...quite different in size....do a little reserach Im not saying our government did this just that the questions are not being answered....I saw the jetliners hit the world trade center...(live) I know that happened
they can't find two wittnesses who saw the same thing...but more importantly...they can't find one witness who can identify the object that hit the pentagon as a jet liner.
Ugh - SO full of crap!
Read, lad. There are a LOT of such examples on the net.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,1300,550486,00.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html
I can see the members of this conspiracy sitting around at the clubhouse and saying, "lets fire a missle at the Pentagon in broad daylight on a weekday in front of 89 cameras and tell everybody it was a 757". BRILLIANT
or better yet...."lets fly 3 planes into buildings and fire ONE missle....that will seem completely normal"
One question! Why do they not release all the other CONFISCATED video? Just one GOOD reason is all I ask.
First, there might be 80+ security cameras around the Pentagon, but I'd be willing to bet very few of them were filming areas relevant to the crash.
But you want just *one* good reason for not releasing all the video? Okay. Here it is:
Presumably, all of the relevant footage came from security cameras around the Pentagon. If you can establish all of the angles from which the event was filmed, you would be well along your way to figuring out where all (or at least several) of the security cameras are. This creates a security risk because bad guys could then plan to do something evil and would have info allowing them to plan on how to circumvent or disable the security cameras.
Happy?
1. They didn't want to have the chain of custody on any of the video called into question in case it was used at trial.
2. They didn't want to be accused by the defense of trying to taint the jury pool by releasing the video.
How about another?
The government was worried it could have been used shortly after the attacks by terrorists to make propaganda films to encourage copycats. (Admittedly, this one probably isn't likely.)
Clouder I watch aircraft land and take off everday. At 400 mph if you raise the nose of an aircraft it will go up....that seems to be the norm with every type of aircraft I've seen so far.
So, what happens when a plane is in descent and the nose is forced up, as in, OOPS, I'm about 150yards short of where I want to be? And who said it was going 400 MPH?
Clouder..
Come on there where several people jumping on this guy for posting this. One of you must have something, some expertise that will shed some light on the subject and tell us why they have not released anything other then they have!!
Too much coincidence to be a conspiracy! Most if not all security cameras are motion activated. at 530mph you are lucky to see what you saw. Why would we launch a missle? Where are all of the people aboard? Why would our missle be so poorly guided? Would a missle leave a path before it explodes? I love a good conspiracy, unfortunatly this is not one of them. You call people morons, but who is blindly following a theory? A conpiracy theory? If it walks like a duck.....[:D]
That is the best you could come up with? Are you kidding me? First you start off with the huge huge assumption "Presumably, all of the relevant footage came from security cameras around the Pentagon." not a good thing to start out with, ya think? All angles from all the cameras? You must be joking. Do you have any knowledge of cameras what soever? You are telling me that the video shot from the state's own cameras which, by the way are CRYSTAL CLEAR and would most defintely show a freaking 757 flying by since they are FREAKING LIVE AND RECORD ALL THE DAMN TIME. Your reply is more of a joke, you remind me of those tree hugging, whale saving folks who think that saftey and security are the most important thing in the world. Funny and sad!
I don't know why I'm responding to a 'tard like you, I guess I'm a glutton for punishment. You did see the word "relevant" in my post, right? So go look it up. And yes, I do know something about cameras. For example, one reason why footage from security cameras isn't crystal clear is because they often are set to record at slow frame rates to conserve data storage space. But enough talk, it's early in the morning and you probably have to catch the bus to your high school.
I can't imagine someone with no glide scope taking a airliner which they didn't fly every day or even ever and gliding across a highway and striking the Pentagon while being only a few feet above the deck....and not dragging the engines on the grass.
That's like letting Pee Wee Herman play some PS2 Nascar games and then giving him Rusty Wallaces car to go on to win a Nascar race.
Who in their right mind would believe such a thing could ever happen.
All of our UAV's are computer controlled via satellite.
Imagine what would happen if a hacker at Lockheed Martin took control of a Global Hawk fitted with weapons and used it to strike something like the Pentagon from a remote place like Saudi Arabia....
Would the govt. want people to have knowledge on how the attack was made?
I'm not saying that is what happened but just describing how something could happen and many people would not want that information released.
There are many that are against unmanned aerial combat vehicles and would love to show that it is an evil that should not ever be put in service. The enemy can easily gain control of our UAV's.
everyone talks about the speed of the craft flying into the building. well there is a 100yd strip of scorched earth as a path leading to the hole in the bulding. wouldn't that slow the craft down enough to catch a single frame of footage that shows the plane?
as for the cameras...security? My local 7-11 has a regular camera that records in real time why wouldn't some of those 89 cameras be able to show images like that? the answer is, they would and do...the government won't release them