In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

One Of You Hates My 11 Round Mag.

tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
edited August 2003 in General Discussion
OK, OK, it's not quite that serious but I didn't know any easy way to make my opening statement and have it all fit into the subject box. But at least one member here seems to have a fondness for the so called "Clinton Assualt Weapons Ban", at least in regards to the 10 round limitation on post-ban magazines. I don't want to be a name caller, but if you read my topic "Did I Make You Violate A Gun Law" perhaps you will spot the person I am talking about. If I am wrong, then by not naming that person then no harm done. But if you can spot his/her seemingly agreement with the ban, then so be it. But even at that I basically am just posting this because I want to communicate with that person.

I have a lot of disagreements with the so called "Clinton Assualt Weapons Ban" (CAWB from now on). It is a law that can make criminals out of honest but careless gun owners and worse, it does little or no good for the public. Why make a restrictive gun law that burdens the honest gun owners, costs the government time and money to enforce but DOESN'T ACTUALLY DO ANY GOOD FOR THE PUBLIC? Isn't that kind of like the tag on your mattress "do not remove under penalty of the law"? or some such example.

But here is a specific example of how the law is no good. Until I "retired" I worked in the armored transportation industry for nearly 10 years. One example. I have actually met a commercial jet on the tarmac at the airport and my partner and I loaded 148 million dollars ($148,000,000.00) onto our vehicle. Folks that is enough cash to cause the army from some small country to come in with helicopters and try and steal that money. So of course we carried guns and thought at some point our life would likely depend on how well those guns worked. I carried a 40 cal S&W model 4046 but because I was not the exalted "law enforcement" I was llimited to the civilian 10 round mag. But believe me I carried a lot of mags. So you think problem solved, right? Wrong. The LEO mags carried only (ONLY) one round more for 11 rounds. But because my mag was limited to ONLY one round less, it had to be designed and manufactuered diffently than the LEO mags. The body of the mag was much different, the spring was a whole lot different and even the follower was different than the LEO version. Now folks, check with ANY engineer or gun designer. Anytime you have two different designs trying to do the same job ONE DESIGN IS GOING TO WORK BETTER THAN THE OTHER! Simple fact of life. The LEO could use either mag he chose. I could only use the 10 round mag. What if (boy he/she hates that phrase), what if the civillian version was imperfect comparred to the LEO version and "what if" (there it is again!) I got into a gunfight and my civilian mag failed whereas the LEO mag would have saved my life. Is that reasonable or fair? Opinions please.

When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.

Comments

  • BlueTicBlueTic Member Posts: 4,072
    edited November -1
    I guess - for the most part - You are preachin to the choir here[:D] It is very sad that people actually believed in what they were doing with this Assault Weapons Ban - but I do not believe in acronyms[:p]

    IF YOU DON'T LIKE MY RIGHTS - GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY (this includes politicians)
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    Blue tic: I almost wish I were preaching to the choir here about the assualt weapons ban, but if you posted an inquiry and people cared to answer honestly I think you would be surprised about how your fellow gun owners think about the ban.

    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
  • robsgunsrobsguns Member Posts: 4,581 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    No Blue Tic is right, you really are preaching to the choir here. Probably 99% of us would like to be able to have what ever capacity mag will handily fit onto our guns. Dont beat this dead horse too long, it will still be dead, you know? Not to criticize your topic at all, but I really dont think there are many here who agree with a mag. limited to just 10 rounds or less.

    marinesega2.jpg
    SSgt Ryan E. Roberts, USMC
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    robsgun: if you believe that, then you can test your idea by posting a subject asking people, and encouraging an honest reply, about how they feel. I don't think the "choir" is as in agreement as some of you think.

    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
  • RugerNinerRugerNiner Member Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Can't be me. [:D]
    I have 10, 11, 15, 20 and 30 round magazines for my pistols. [8D]

    sniper1.gif Remember...Terrorist are attacking Civilians; Not the Government. Protect Yourself!
    Keep your Powder dry and your Musket well oiled.
    NRA Lifetime Benefactor Member.
  • paboogerpabooger Member Posts: 13,953
    edited November -1
    It ain't me! But I ain't a tellin what I have![:p]

    pacamo

    To Ride, shoot straight,and speak the truth
    This was the Ancient law of Youth
    Old times are past, old times are done:
    But the Law runs true, O little son!
  • faldumfaldum Member Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    tr fox:

    May I ask one question?

    You have noted on numerous posts the fact
    you are (were) uncomfortable with the design/engineering
    of your handgun.

    Why did you not select a different piece if such was
    the case?
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    faldum: once again you have asked a very good question that cuts through all the bullsh*t and gets closer to the heart of the matter. At first I carried a S&W 40 cal Sigma with 3 15 (or maybe 16, I don't recall) mags. One day during my periodic qualifcation at the police range my Sigma malfunctioned 3 times within 50 rounds. I felt I could never trust that gun again so that afternoon I boxed it up and UPS'ed to S&W with a note telling what had happened and stating that I never wanted to see that gun again because it was not used for sport, but might be used to save my life. I stated that I wanted the retail credit price for the gun and I would pay the retail difference for a S&W all stainless (slide AND FRAME) but I also wanted a visible hammer. My demands limited me to the model I mentioned. S&W did replace the striker in the Sigma and sent it back but I refused it and after a phone discussion I paid a little difference and got the all stainless. Thanks for asking that pertinant question and given me an opportunity to tell my story (although there are some who will regret having to read it). Bottom line I personally will never again trust a polymer frame gun without a visble hammer. Sorry, that's just me.

    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
  • mark christianmark christian Member Posts: 24,443 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Since the S&W 4046 went into production in 1991 there are pre ban unrestricted high cap magazines available-- CDNN has them available for $20 in like new condition. Since my own life is easily worth the cost of 5 or 6 magazines ($100) I would have simply purchased the factory preban mags and had the original design and the all important extra round at my disposal. How much does 148 million dollars weigh and how long did it take two men to remove it from the airplane and load it into your armored vehicle? By the way, I never liked the SIGMA either-- terrible trigger!

    Mark T. Christian
  • HighballHighball Member Posts: 15,755
    edited November -1
    TR....Don't be so quick to condemn a man telling you the law.
    He doesn't have to agree with it..do you agree with 20,000 gun laws ? BUT...He does have to obey it..as we all obey the stupid,obnoxious,insane laws the Fedgov and NRA have saddled us with..

    Want to do something constructive ?..Call your Senator,ask him to ban ALL guns...give the police authority to go door to door,collecting them....


    God,Guts,& GunsHave we lost all 3 ??
  • Supreme OneSupreme One Member Posts: 1,423 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hello, "May I ask one question?", "Why did you not select a different piece if such was the case?" That is two questons.

    Michael

    Paranoid keeps you alive, worry just gives you stomach problems.
    - .- -.- . / -- -.-- / .- -.. ...- .. ... . --..-- / .. .----. -- / -. --- - / ..- ... .. -. --. / .. - / .- -. -.-- .-- .- -.-- .-.-.-
    Politics- From the words poly, meaning many, and tics, which are just little blood suckers.
    .-.. .. ..-. . / .. ... / .- / ... . -..- ..- .- .-.. .-.. -.-- / - .-. .- -. ... -- .. - - . -.. / -.. .. ... . .- ... . .-.-.-
    If "con" is the opposite of "pro," then what is the opposite of progress?
    sound
  • scksck Member Posts: 145 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    This whole issue of magazines and "postban" vs. "preban" is pretty much a meaningless debate. So you have to carry one or two more 10 round magazines or pay a little more for the high caps? Big deal. If you're in real need to more fire power than that and only have a S&W semi-auto at hand, your in way over your head and are too slow to realize it. A more important issue would be to confront those cities in the U.S. that have outlawed any magazine that holds more than 10 rounds regardless of when it was made or who you are.
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    Mark C., OK, to a degree you have got me. And in fact I do have 3 of the 11 round pre-ban mags. But just because there is luckily a way to get around an unfair law does not make that unfair law a good and honest law. Let me exagerrate to make a point. If you agree that is is fair for me to have the 11 round standard design mags, then it is unfair for me to have to go to ANY unusual lengths to get them, such as search and find and order by mail. And if I was younger and decided to go into the armored transport business within 20 years or so, my model 4046 would still be a good gun but would I be forced to use the inferior 10 round civilian mags to defend my life? That is possible because the supply of pre-ban 11 rounds mags (manufactureed between 1991-93 was not large) may have dried up or worn out.

    And in regards to your question you caught me in a little exagerattion. I not the lying kind, but I didn't think it made any difference to anyone so I tried to keep my statement short and to the point. We actually had 2 armored vehicles and 4 crew members and each vehhicle only had approximately 75 million on board. They were wrapped in brown plastic and each "bundle" contained 1 million dollars. I don't know the weight, but each bundle felt like weighed approximately 20-30 pounds. Only took about 30-45 minutes to load because we were very anxious to get moving.

    highball: say what?

    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
  • HighballHighball Member Posts: 15,755
    edited November -1
    Life is really simple,when you think about it.

    Keep whinning about the un-Constitutional gun laws....keep following the mis-leaders in the gov and nra as they lead you over the cliff..watch the slow,steady sure erosion of your RIGHTS...given by God,removed by those you trust........


    OR....allow the Socialists that which they so earnestly desire..the laws to totally disarm the populace of America..the last,great hope of Mankind before the Coming.....Then,My friend..you will have to stand and be counted ....either as an American...or as a sniveling coward,unfit to shine the boots of a free man. Which do you chose..?..A decision you and many others may have to make in your lifetime........

    God,Guts,& GunsHave we lost all 3 ??
  • nitrouznitrouz Member Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    the purpose of the magazine ban is a slow erosion of firearm possession by the general public over a couple generations.

    You can't disarm an armed populace over 1 generation.

    Over two or three generations and several thousand laws later you can have a completely unarmed populace.......Their Goal.

    When I build my house in 9 years I am going to incorporate a buried school bus into the foundation....accessed by a tunnel. My sons and their sons and their sons will all have whatever they need no matter if firearms are completely banned.

    Hopefully others will be thinking ahead and do the same.

    jesus2000x.jpg?mtbrand=NS_US

    "He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one."
    - Jesus Christ in Luke 22:36
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    nitrouz: I like your thinnking, but please for you own safety don't advertise what you are doing.

    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
  • IAMAHUSKERIAMAHUSKER Member Posts: 2,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I always thought about doing something like that myself(school bus thing) but, I am so busy working my butt off to pay taxes that pay the salaries of the scum bags that make the laws, I think I will never be able to afford a house.

    Highball: you and I see eye to eye on a lot of things, keep posting man!!!
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    Originally posted by sck
    T If you're in real need to more fire power than that and only have a S&W semi-auto at hand, your in way over your head and are too slow to realize it.

    sck: I never said the S&W semi-auto was the only gun I had available to me while loading that money. I merely mentioned one gun, a sidearm, which happened to be the S&W 40 cal. And while you seem to not mind having to go to special effort to get around the 10 round ban(search and find preban mags) I resent the US Govt. making me go to such foolish efforts just for the sake of a law that does little or no good to protect the public.



    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
  • tesla85tesla85 Member Posts: 728 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Tr fox, I have basically the same gun except I went with the 4003 which is your gun except aluminum and double action. I know what you are talking about w/ the 1l round mag, what a pain in the @ss.

    When they come to get your GUNS, make sure to give them the AMMO first!!!
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    telsa85: You have a good gun, but in my case I have never liked alloy frames. Aluminum is a soft and brittel metal and as far as I am concerned alloy is not good enough for me. Thus the reason for the all stainless steel 4046. Now a lot of people hate that gun because it is double action on every shot and the action is about the same pull as a S&W revolver. Andd it can never be shot single action (ie a cocked hanmmer. You cannot have a cocked hammer. I'm sure you already know this). But I expected that some day I would have a serious need to quickly pull and shot my gun while doing my armored transporttion job. And I know that sudden stress (like being shot at or shooting at someone) makes people lose a WHOLE lot of their usual abilities and they do weird things such as forget to off the safety or even put the safety on, when it was already being carried in an off postition, and then try to shoot. Or they forget to decock and the cocked pistol accedently goes off. So the reason for my chosing the 4046. Pull, point and pull trigger. Simple and no room for error. Plus I can shoot it very very well.

    When guns were invented everything changed. For the first time in the history of the world a frail woman had a chance to sucessfully defend herself and home. My dream is that one of the anti-gun nuts will need a gun for defense and be unable to have one because of their own actions.
  • chunkstylechunkstyle Member Posts: 2,463 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by mark christian
    How much does 148 million dollars weigh?

    If it were in $20 bills it would be almost 8 tons.

    "Go to Lakedaemon, stranger passing by;
    And say there, that in obedience to her law, here we lie"
Sign In or Register to comment.