In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

A good read, .380 vs 9mm

BoomerangBoomerang Member Posts: 4,513
edited September 2012 in General Discussion
Read the entire article, very interesting and objective. http://hunting.about.com/od/guns/l/aast9mmv380a.htm

Comments

  • pirate2501pirate2501 Member Posts: 1,851 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Interesting article - thanks [:)]
  • EMCSEMCS Member Posts: 4,063
    edited November -1
    Thanks for the article.

    Question for anyone with knowledge of ballistic test.

    Why are these test done at 20 ft ?

    When a lot of civilian self defense shoot outs appear to be done a close range from 0-7 Feet .
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,529 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • riflemikeriflemike Member Posts: 10,599
    edited November -1
    i want this one when my CCW gets here in a couple of weeks but they aint cheap...but its a SIG

    smaller than the colt
    http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=308160094
  • Jim RauJim Rau Member Posts: 3,550
    edited November -1
    The most efficient 'short' barrel cartridge in existence is the 9 mm Par! I have been doing ballistic testing and research for about 30 years (with the intent to prove the 45 ACP best, but the more I did the more I found out I was WRONG)![:I]
    What I did find is if you use the best defence loads in 9mm, 357 Sig/Mag, 40 S&W/10mm, 45 ACP/Colt/GAP there is so little difference in their terminal ballistics (when applied to a human target) they are, for realistic intent, equal!!!
    This article is right on target, BUT a 380 in the pocket is better than a 45 in the safe!!!![;)]
    My personal preference, when considering the totally of the circumstances and all calibers, is the9mm for self defence/CCW![:)]
  • roswellnativeroswellnative Member Posts: 10,195 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thanks so the answer is 9!!!
    Although always described as a cowboy, Roswellnative generally acts as a righter of wrongs or bodyguard of some sort, where he excels thanks to his resourcefulness and incredible gun prowesses.
  • o b juano b juan Member Posts: 1,941 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    how does the 9x18 stack up?
  • AnonymouseAnonymouse Member Posts: 4,050
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by o b juan
    how does the 9x18 stack up?


    About the same as a .380.
  • AnonymouseAnonymouse Member Posts: 4,050
    edited November -1
    Who would think the .380 even comes close to the 9mm?
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,437 ******
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by select-fire
    My little 9mm is as small as a .380

    http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.aspx?Item=308011360
    You pointed that out to me once before, and I am thankful you did.[:)]
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • SperrySperry Member Posts: 5,006 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote: You can choose among single-action, double-action, or so-called DAO mechanisms,


    He dissin' my favorite action for concealed carry?

    9 x 18" - From what I've personally observed, it would be punchier than .380.
    Aren't they loaded as hot as 9mm?
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,437 ******
    edited November -1
    I didn't read anything that guy had to say after "sub-effective 22".
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,529 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Sperry
    quote: You can choose among single-action, double-action, or so-called DAO mechanisms,


    He dissin' my favorite action for concealed carry?

    9 x 18" - From what I've personally observed, it would be punchier than .380.
    Aren't they loaded as hot as 9mm?


    Makarovs aren't even close to a 9mm. bout' like a .380
  • partisanpartisan Member Posts: 6,414
    edited November -1
    Not that I don't believe the stats, but I have always hated the 9mm![}:)]
  • MMOMEQ-55MMOMEQ-55 Member Posts: 13,134
    edited November -1
    In the winter with my leather jacket, I carry either a 357sig or a 45, both calibers in an XD. My jacket has a holster built in under the left shoulder. In the summer I carry a little Ruger 380 in my front pocket. I have never felt under gunned with either. Granted the little 380 is mild compared to my 357 or 45 but I guarantee you if I shoot you with that little 380, if you survive, you will only be thinking about getting to a doctor.

    I practice a lot and when I practice with the 380 I shoot for the head. Most situations where I will need to pull my gun will be less than 10 feet. At 10 feet I can put 2 in your face in less than a second. I would prefer two to the heart with a 45, but a 45 XD is a little hard to conceal when I am wearing my speedo on the beach.[:0]

    Back in the days before CCW I carried a Jennings 22 in my front pocket. Yes I know a Jennings is a POS but it went bang every time. That little 22 had all the black paint wore off it and many times I had to pull a barrel full of lint out of it. I actually had to pull that 22 on a guy one night. When he saw the gun all he wanted to do was get as far away from me as possible.

    If I had my choice I would carry my 5" barreled 45 XD but that is a big pistol to conceal. As long as I am carrying something that is reliable, that is all that matters to me.
  • KEVD18KEVD18 Member Posts: 15,037
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by EMCS
    Thanks for the article.

    Question for anyone with knowledge of ballistic test.

    Why are these test done at 20 ft ?

    When a lot of civilian self defense shoot outs appear to be done a close range from 0-7 Feet .



    7 yards is generally considered to be the outer threshold for self defense. beyond that distance, it becomes increasingly hard to make the claim that your life was in imminent danger. there are exceptions of course. one can be in very imminent danger from a mile or better if theres a sniper who knows his business, but in general imminent danger means its happening right in front of you. an able bodied person intent on doing you harm can cover that distance in a very short period of time. as that distance approaches zero, you have less and less time to employ any other means of survival.

    this changes somewhat in states that have stand your ground laws, deadly force for simple trespass etc, but its presented as a general theory, not an absolute doctrine.
  • utbrowningmanutbrowningman Member Posts: 2,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well, he did the test in two Taurus handguns. Throw the test out the window. Now if he used Jennings...

    I carry a 9, by the way.
  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Seems to me a bullet hole in important parts causes "issues" for the target. The bigger the hole the better; however, any hole is better than no hole at all.
  • p3skykingp3skyking Member Posts: 23,916 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    About 25 years ago I did my own study. I determined that out to about 50 feet, the .380 and 9mm were about equal for real world intents and purposes. After 50 feet, the 9mm had the edge.

    I carry my .380 Walther for personal defense. That will be at less than 50 feet.
  • SCOUT5SCOUT5 Member Posts: 16,181 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    From article: "If your personal-defense handgun is going to be a small autoloader, and you are buying it because the chance exists that it may someday have to save your life, the choice between a 380 or a 9mm is still a no-brainer. Get a 9mm."

    That's fine, but energy out the front end is directly related to energy on the back end, get what you can handle. For small folks with small hands the .380 they can control is much better than the 9mm they can't, and article is addressing small auto loaders, not full sized bricks.
  • Jim RauJim Rau Member Posts: 3,550
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by bpost
    Seems to me a bullet hole in important parts causes "issues" for the target. The bigger the hole the better; however, any hole is better than no hole at all.
    This statement is exactly why the myth about the 'bigger is better' continues. There is .097 inches difference between the 45 and the 9mm. It has been show that this 'less than 1/10 of an inch' is insignificant when it comes to wound ballistics.
    Like I said above, the difference between the 'wounds' caused by the 'best' defense ammo (expanding bullets) in the most used hand gun calibers is less then 5%, realistically no difference.
    Also, I have been to many autopsies and talked to many who preform the autopsies and they all say if they see a complete penetration (pass through) by a non expanding hand gun bullet they can not tell any difference between the wound channel of a 32 or a 45!
    No emotion, just fact![;)]
    If your reference to 'bigger hole' refers to the 'permanent wound cavity' caused by expanding bullets you are correct, but again when the difference is less than 5% realistically they are ALL equal![;)]
Sign In or Register to comment.