In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Scout Rifle

gap1916gap1916 Member Posts: 4,977
edited January 2003 in General Discussion
Been thinking about a "Scout" bolt action rifle. Looking to keep it reasonably lower priced, looking at rifles <$500. Been looking at the Howa ranch rifles, I think about $550 with the scope. Anybody got any recommendations? My only deal is, it's gotta be in .308. I was doing some planning, once I get my cash, I can probably get a Honda Rebel (or kawasaki ninja) 250, a Iphone 4 (I can get them from ATT for $130) and probably a rifle. Was thinking about a tattoo, but I just want one, don't know what I would want, and I need a tattoo like I need another hole in my head. They're useless, so a rifle would be a better bet (and I can't sell a tattoo if I get tight on cash.).

Comments

  • gap1916gap1916 Member Posts: 4,977
    edited November -1
    Jeff Cooper's scout concept that became a reality I thought was a good idea. Does anyone haver an opinion about the Enfield .308 Gibbs Extream Quest II or III as a scout rifle? Maybe you have a better idea. I do not want to spend alot and would like to have a decent Brush gun. All comments welcome.
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    The beauty of the Scout concept is that you can try to create one out of your favorite gun and see if you can either match or exceed Cooper's expectations for it. If the idea appeals to you, I say go ahead. I can't afford a Steyr either. Frankly, I'd like to see a good semi-auto Scout, but that would be heresy to Cooper's concept.
    "The 2nd Amendment is about defense, not hunting. Long live the gun shows, and reasonable access to FFLs. Join the NRA -- I'm a Life Member."
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The Springfield M1A Scout variant is very tempting. Alas, it is too expensive for my blood at the moment. Maybe after my raise in May. Then again, a Yamaha Grizzly is much more tempting.
  • .250Savage.250Savage Member Posts: 812 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    By the very nature of the beast (lowest possible weight), semi-auto is conta-indicated. Semi-autos MUST have additional mechanisms to relieve your lazy behind of cycling the bolt, hence more weight. I personally have been looking at the Czech mid-sized (8mm) action, which is just about right for the .308, as the full-size Mauser is more suited to .30-06. I REALLY like the improvements of the Winchester Model 70 to the basic design, but the Model 70 is not as (cheaply) available as the Mauser, and VERY few have the stripper clip slot, which I value very highly. My Scout will have a two-pocket pouch on the right (off) side of the buttstock with two fully loaded stripper clips, negating the need for the in-buttstock loading gizmo.
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    If I can't find a semi-auto action that is lighter than an old Mauser action, I'll eat my hat. Too many good metals and alloys around these days.
  • YanquiYanqui Member Posts: 58 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Check out this website for a discussion of Scout Rifle Concept.

    http://www.paratrooper.net/aotw/commo/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5024

    Set it up the way you want. What ever you decide to use as a Scout Rifle is a Scout Rifle. After all a "Scout Rifle" is a "Hunting Rifle" plain and simple. I have a Winchester 94AE Wrangler in 30-30 fitted with a Leopold 2.5 x 28 Duplex Reticle, I.E.R Scout Scope. It is a Scout Rifle or better yet a Lever Scout.

    The darn scope cost more than the carbine.

    Enjoy your creation.

    "A sword is never a killer, it's a tool in the killer's hands"
    Lucius Annaeus Seneca "the younger" ca. (4 BC - 65 AD)
  • TOOLS1TOOLS1 Member Posts: 6,133
    edited November -1
    I am in the process of makeing a scout rifel. I am useing a no4 enfield that had allready been sporterized. I am cutting it down to 16 1/2 inch barrel. And am useing a Bushnell red dot scope. I am moveing the frt band bach to where the second band was and leaveing the upper hand guard in place.
    I had found a site called Golden Lokie. It has all kinds of information on guns. It also shows a project to convert a mosin nagent M-44 into a scout rifel.
    The gibbs rifels are pretty neat. But when I tried to get one they were out of stock and nobody could find one. I did find one at a gun show but it was expensive.
    It is far cheaper to make one yourself. I bought the rifel at a pawen shop for $50 with a B-Square scope mount already on it. I got the Bushnell scope for $75 at a gun show. So far $125 and some time.
    TOOLS

    General TOOLS RRG

    Don't go blaming the beer. Hank Hill

    When I was a child, I thought as a child. But now that I am grown, I just wish I could act like a child and get away with it.
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Not only do I think Cooper's "Scout" rifle is a solution to a non-existent problem, I do not see the conceptual difference between it and a Remington 600 or any other short-barreled, scoped rifle with iron sights firing a "full-size" cartridge. Can someone therefore please explain the difference and/or need here?


    Resident Wittgensteinian
  • kimberkidkimberkid Member Posts: 8,858 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    DancesWithSheep -
    For the price of a Styer Scout, its not about "NEED"

    Its something new and it's about the name and prestige.

    It seems to me that most of the "new" weapons and ammo are either revived past failures like the .17, or manufacturers playing on buyers emotion of presenting something new like this whole bunch of "Short Magnums" and "Belted Magnums" ... heck, even the .260 Remington is nearly identical to the 6.5 Mauser ... care to explain how that's "new"?

    Its all Marketing.

    ===========================
    Chance favors the prepared mind
    kimberkid@gunbroker.zzn.com
    If you really desire something, you'll find a way ?
    ? otherwise, you'll find an excuse.
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have thought for sometime now that gun manufacturers market guns like Detroit markets mini-vans and Mattel markets Barbies: Invent a need, get some "G&A" staffer to write a piece to generate interest (for which the magazine will later receive advertising $$$), then present it to the kids like "What the hell are you still doing with that old thing?". I think there is a world of difference between genuine "need" and a "need for something new"; and, as boys will be boys, a lot of us deliberately and conveniently confuse the two.


    Resident Wittgensteinian
  • flatdogflatdog Member Posts: 201 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    DancesWithSheep,

    I'll take a shot at answering your question. I think the overriding advantage of a properly executed "Scout Concept Rifle" is target acquisition and accurate shot placement. In the shortest possible time frame under field conditions.

    To this end you must be willing to mount a scope with long eye relief and wide field of view , forward of the front receiver ring(bolt action).

    You must also firmly commit to keeping both eyes open.
    If not it will negate the purpose of forward scope placement and the "CONCEPT" itself. It may be awkward at first, but once mastered you will have an almost unimpeded view of both the target and it's immediate surroundings. This has enormous field utility. With dedication you can obtain consistant vital area hits in an extremely short time frame at any range you deem practical and ethical. I can find no such advantage from the bench on paper targets.

    The SAVAGE 10FCM SCOUT has not been mentioned it is a well made rifle. There are good scopes that will fit. It is accurate and resonably priced. But it needs a better trigger out of the box. Savage has a new Accu-Trigger coming out I believe in 2003. It ships with only one magazine, go figure.

    I think that Col. Cooper's percieved attitude of "my way or the highway" has put many people off the "CONCEPT". He is nothing if not blunt in his writing. He didn't claim to have invented the concept. He took an already existing concept quantified and improved it,then brought it to the attention of the public.

    It works for me. But some of my hunting buds have that "what's that getup for", look in their eyes when they see my Savage.

    flatdog.


    " Love is what goes on between a man and a .45 pistol that won't jam."
  • Shootist3006Shootist3006 Member Posts: 4,171
    edited November -1
    Col Cooper is a GREAT pistolero, don't think much of the 'scout' concept however.

    Quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem.Semper Fidelis
  • kimberkidkimberkid Member Posts: 8,858 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:
    I think there is a world of difference between genuine "need" and a "need for something new"; and, as boys will be boys, a lot of us deliberately and conveniently confuse the two.

    More often than not ... I trip, slip and fall squarely into that category!


    ===========================
    Chance favors the prepared mind
    kimberkid@gunbroker.zzn.com
    If you really desire something, you'll find a way ?
    ? otherwise, you'll find an excuse.
  • 2 gun2 gun Member Posts: 377 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    For the money of the styer scout which I belive is the cooper pic I'ld go with a springfield m1a scout none better.a less expensive scout is a parkerized sweedish mouser with a good plastic type stock and tang peep sights or a mill spec scope.

    IT"S better to die by fire then serve by force
  • Ricky3Ricky3 Member Posts: 87
    edited November -1
    there are 4 lb versions of the AR-15, so what are you TALKING about, the autos can't compete? There is either NO need of the Scout's speed, (ie, hunting)or you BADLY need an auto rifle. The Scout's caliber, short barrel, and low powered Scope means that it has no more effective range than a good HBAR. A woman Marine beat EVERYBODY in the Service Rifle matches at Camp Perry, 3-4 years ago, and the AR-223 OWNS the 600 yd line at such matches. Don't kid yourself about the 223 not having all the reach that anyone can realistically use, as a civilian survivalist.

    Animals are dumb, easily approached to within 100 yds, and anyone who can't brain them at that range, from a braced position and with a scoped rifle, is in a bad way. Noone HAS to hunt, and if you did, you would use bait, jacklighting, etc, to take the animals, and you'd take them every chance you got, the young, the females, etc, too. So the Scout Rifle is a joke. It's not a sniper rifle, it's not a fighting rifle. It's not a dangerous-game rifle. It's not a trainer for such rifles. It's not a small game rifle (like the AR223 CAN be, with a .22 lr conversion unit) it's not a varmint rifle, it's not a match rifle, and its horrifically expensive to boot. It's not rustproofed, it has no luminous sights, it's not a take down model, it's not ambidextrous. Basically, it's a screw-over.
Sign In or Register to comment.