Bush-Kerry-Other?

Artic wolf

What One do you want for President???????

ElMuertoMonkey

Edwards seems the most palatable to me. He's not as anti-gun as Bush and Kerry are (not that he's pro-gun, just not AS anti as the other two), has a pretty solid plan for tax cuts for the middle class (I believe he wants a tax cut for everyone, individuals and families, that earn under $250,000 a year), and is advocating a $3.5 billion job training program. He also wants to withdraw from NAFTA.

Pretty reasonable all around. Not perfect, but preferable to Bush or Kerry.

Big Sky Redneck

If the choices are Kerry and Bush I'll be damned if I will cast a vote that will even come close to helping kerry. The way Emm, Hairy, Highball and some others feel about Bush is my feeling towards Kerry Xs10! If it comes down to Bush and Kerry in the election I will become a serious devoted religious nut and pray to God very aggressivly that if Kerry wins we get hit by a big meteor and the world ends because as far as I am concerned Kerry is the Anti Christ and the end is near!

DancesWithSheep

quote:Originally posted by 7mm nut
...as far as I am concerned Kerry is the Anti Christ...

Interestingly, if you write "outdoortexas" backwards in Tamil, leaving out only two letters, you get 666.

Big Sky Redneck

DWS, what does that have to do with the price of milk in China on Monday?

DancesWithSheep

How can Kerry be the Anti-Christ when I've just proven outdoortexas is the Anti-Christ? (John 3:18)

Big Sky Redneck

Now you're ganna get all techinical on me[V] Ok then, Kerry is satan, hows that?

DancesWithSheep

Works for me.

Patrick Odle

Anyone voting for any of the fly by night
democraps over Bush are forever barred from
whinning or gripping about librel gun laws
passed in the future. So don't be hypocrite
and vote for that mass. ultra librel and then
have the gall to come amongst the honest gun
owners on the forum gripping.


and by the way slicks little puppy wasn't
named gfatlady.

rcdis

Vote NO for president.

rcdis

salzo

quote:Originally posted by ElMuertoMonkey
[ has a pretty solid plan for tax cuts for the middle class (I believe he wants a tax cut for everyone, individuals and families, that earn under $250,000 a year),

Could someone explain why someone who makes less than $250,000 is entitled to a tax cut, but someone who makes more than $250,000 isnt entitled to a tax cut?

"Waiting tables is what you know, making cheese is what I know-lets stick with what we know!"
-Jimmy the cheese man

select-fire

I will bet it won't be Nader. He is exactly like his Corvair" unsafe at any speed"

outdoortexas

Damn, DWS, damn!

Who'd a thunk anyone would have know'd Tamil around here?
Guess there's no sence in me tryin' to hide it any longer. [;)]

ElMuertoMonkey

Salzo,

Because $250,000 a year for a family of four is the middle class. According to Edwards, those who make over $1,000,000 will have their tax cuts reduced.

Now, between you and me, over $1,000,000 a year is a lot of cabbage and those folks can probably afford the good accountants that will get them tax breaks anyway. Pinching the upper class never caused a nation or government to collapse, but pinching the middle class led to the fall of the Roman Empire, the Romanov Dynasty in Russia, just about every Chinese dynasty since the Han, and the French monarchy.

Also, when you figure that the richest 1% own, what, 20% of the wealth in this nation, they can afford to pay out a little more.

I wouldn't worry about the upper class being unfairly taxed... there will always be an upper class, but as nations like Haiti, the Congo, and Burma prove, the middle class can rapidly turn into an endangered species.