In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Hillary for President!!!

daddodaddo Member Posts: 3,408
edited August 2003 in General Discussion
Please, keep it going!

To show your support for Hillary and encourage her on her run for President
of the United States in 2008, please add your name to the rapidly growing
list below and send it on to your entire list.



1. Bill

2. Chelsea

3.
[}:)][}:)][:D][:D]

Comments

  • daddodaddo Member Posts: 3,408
    edited November -1
    I bet you dollars to doughnuts, Hillary is going to run for President! She is sneeking in the backdoor. She's as crawly as her hubby- Clinton!
  • maggiethecatmaggiethecat Member Posts: 2,381 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    and the main line she will use is" bush got us in trouble in iraq, where all our boys are dying. i promise to bring them home right away"


    of course she will start spendind like there is no tomorrow after accusing the repubs of it.

    SGT USMC
    SSGT USAF
    The greatest happiness is to see your enemy scattered before you, to see his village in ashes, and to gather to your bed his wives and daughters.-Genghis Khan 1226
  • joey garzajoey garza Member Posts: 523 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Yup she will let the other dems crucify each other until there is one or two left, and then jump in at the last minute, leaving little time to despute her lies.
  • Stormtrooper 13Stormtrooper 13 Member Posts: 236 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    As I said in a earlier post she's already had 2 terms . [}:)]

    Can we realy stand 1 or 2 more ?? [xx(] [xx(]

    qman_lr_105t.jpg


    Only the strong shall survive !!!
  • ww2guncollectorww2guncollector Member Posts: 35 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    if she gets in you can kiss your guns goodbye[:(!]
  • nitrouznitrouz Member Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well if Tampons are now made in Taiwan why not Hillary for President? She'd be the best person to advocate defending their sorry arses. Our guns will be gone because of the people, not a President. The people's representatives must approve such a venture.

    jesus2000x.jpg?mtbrand=NS_US

    "He that hath no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one."
    - Jesus Christ in Luke 22:36
  • ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    Six on one hand, half a dozen the other.
    "Anti-gun?" And Bush has been so pro-gun as of late?
    "Spend like there's no tomorrow?" Hey, the Republicans have been doing a bang-up job of that so far.
    Sure, she's a slimy politician, and not much of a public speaker, but how is that any different from Bush?
    Accept the truth: Bush is just as much a free-spending gun-grabber as any liberal could hope to be.
  • alledanalledan Member Posts: 19,541
    edited November -1
    ....and the whitehouse will be the "red house"-aka "Clintons brothel"!
    It is safe to say that the American people [at least decent Americans]will again suffer world wide shame,disgrace and embarrassment.

    JMHO!
  • ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    Clinton had a rep for getting laid. And while he had a rather dubious taste in women (let's face it, they were pretty fugly), he got his JOB done.

    Now let's look at Bush: the dude likes to land on aircraft carriers and take vacations at his ranch. And while he's off being a moral, forthright guy, Osama Bin Laden is still on the loose, Saddam Hussein is still on the loose, our budget is going to hell in a hand basket, the economy is riding shotgun on that particular journey, and he's not even pro-gun!

    So tell me, what was it again that made this nincompoop so much more preferable to Clinton?
  • RUGERGUNZRUGERGUNZ Member Posts: 5,638 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    ElMuertoMonkey

    In response to your points.

    "Bush: the dude likes to land on aircraft carriers" What, Clinton never did a publicity stunt?

    Takes vacations at his ranch. What, Clinton never took a vacation?

    "And while he's off being a moral forthright guy" Well we all know Clinton never did that.

    "Osama Bin Laden is still on the loose" We knew about this guy long ago and it seems he was "on the loose" during all 8 years of Clinton.

    "Saddam Hussein is still on the loose" Could be, but I would wager not for long. Just ask Uday and Qusay.

    "Our budget is going to hell in a hand basket" This started years ago, plans for budgets dont take immediate effect but take years to determine the outcome.

    "The economy is riding shotgun" See previous statement and realize that our budget and economy go together.

    "He's not even pro-gun" What, are you telling me that the AWB was pro-gun.

    "So tell me, what was it again that made this nincompoop so much more preferable to Clinton?" Well you stated it earlier "moral, forthright guy"
  • woodshermitwoodshermit Member Posts: 2,589
    edited November -1
    She is positioning herself to run in 2008. While most of the near and far right loathe her, she is not to be underestimated. It is a mistake to forget that more people voted for the Democratic candidate than for the Republican one in the last presidential election. John Kerry will be the likely nominee for the Democratic party in 2004, with Howard Dean a close second. If the economy continues to falter and the country is unable to reach closure in Iraq and Afghanistan, Bush is extremely vulnerable. Cheney will not be on the ticket in 2004. Just my $.02.
  • ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    Ruger,

    You will note that the first ban passed by Bush's dad had no sunset provision.

    When you speak of budgets taking years to reach fruition, what you are referring to are ecnomic trends, not the budget. The budget is made every year, typically submitted by the President and members of Congress and hashed out in debate. Bush's budgets have been unfailingly enormous and, as a proven matter of record, not only eliminated the surplus Clinton left us with, but has saddled us with a record deficit.

    Now, contrary to what most Bush apologists will say, debt is not good. Debt is what keeps most of sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America poor. Debt helps no one but the interest-charging banks and even they don't benefit if they don't eventually get paid. And if debt is so great, then why did the Republicans under Newt push their "Contract with America" so hard?

    As for could have, would have, should have, Clinton tried to get Osama by lobbing over two dozen cruise missiles at him. This was the best we could do since we had no permission, and therefore, no safe way to insert our guys into Afghanistan to get him. China, Pakistan, and Russia would not have given us permission and going through their airspace without such permission would have been a costly mistake.

    As for Saddam, if Reagan hadn't been so keen on helping him out, he wouldn't have the means with which to cause us so much trouble now. And wagering doesn't change the fact that he is, as of right now, still a free man.

    And he may be moral and forthright, but he's still a nincompoop. I swear, it's like having Forrest Gump for president...
  • woodshermitwoodshermit Member Posts: 2,589
    edited November -1
    Monkey, I would VOTE for Gump!
  • Stormtrooper 13Stormtrooper 13 Member Posts: 236 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Anybody remember : Sudan 1996 ? Coulda had him there !

    qman_lr_105t.jpg


    Only the strong shall survive !!!
  • longhunterlonghunter Member Posts: 3,242
    edited November -1
    Clinton,Bush/,the other Bush.?the "other" clinton? one better or worse than the other?which,?and why?Because you like demos,or repubs.? or what?why? READ MY LIPS.........Lokk at the idiots you all are argueing about,,,,,,THEY ALL SU** !!! We vote for what is (hopefully)the lesser of two vile evil agendas,not who,whom,is or is not better...who or whom is less...Worse than the other......Blah!!It seems a waste for such intelligent folks such as us to argue over who was/was not better,or is/is not now....What we need is a viable alternative......One that CAN win.....How...I've no idea.....But if anyone does I sure am listening.....L.H.
Sign In or Register to comment.