In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Somehow I don't feel sorry ...

select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,518 ✭✭✭✭
edited May 2006 in General Discussion
What was he thinking... NO prenup agreement..

McCartney may lose quarter of fortune in divorce By Paul Majendie
1 hour, 14 minutes ago



LONDON (Reuters) - Former Beatle Paul McCartney could lose up to a quarter of his estimated $1.56-billion fortune after separating from his second wife Heather Mills, legal experts said on Thursday.

ADVERTISEMENT

That would equate to roughly $1.9 million for every week of their short-lived four-year marriage.

McCartney, 63, and former model Mills, 38, announced their separation on Wednesday, blaming media intrusion for the collapse of one of the most high profile showbusiness marriages.

Lawyers believe the divorce would never be allowed to degenerate into a messy court case but they said McCartney's decision not to seal a pre-nuptial deal could cost him dear in a private settlement.

The couple, who have a two-year-old daughter, Beatrice, met in 1999 at a charity event, a year after the death from breast cancer of McCartney's first wife Linda Eastman.

Lawyer Mark Stephens of Finers, Stephens and Innocent told Reuters: "Heather and the child need to be looked after financially. I think you are looking at 150 million to 200 million pounds ($283-377 million)."

"She is the child of a Beatle and they have to live in a cosseted and protected environment," he said, recalling the killing of John Lennon by a crazed fan and the attempt on the life of George Harrison.

Independent legal estimates on how much Heather could get are based on a recent high profile divorce dispute between fund manager Alan Miller and his wife Melissa.

She was awarded five million pounds of his 20 million pound fortune after a childless marriage that lasted less than three years. The House of Lords, Britain's highest court, is to make a final ruling on the case next week.

After their separation was announced, McCartney denied that Heather had ever been attracted to his fortune, estimated by the Sunday Times Rich List at 825 million pounds ($1.56 billion).

"It's been suggested that she married me for the money," he said. "There is not an ounce of truth in this."

In an interview before her marriage, Mills said she had offered to sign a pre-nuptial agreement but McCartney had turned down the offer.

"The acid test is now," said Stephen Foster, head of the divorce department at Stewarts. "I think it would be a big award. I wouldn't be shocked if it is 100 million pounds."

"He famously didn't sign a pre-nup as he said it was unromantic. If they don't resolve things amicably and it becomes a protracted court case, that could be a very expensive decision," he said.

"If Paul and Heather had any sense -- and I am sure they do --- they would both seek top quality independent advice from lawyers and accountants and settle this round a table. Is it in anyone's interest to be front page news for a year?"


Email Story IM Story Discuss Printable View RECOMMEND THIS STORY
Recommend It:

Average (83 votes)
? Recommended

Comments

  • DocDoc Member Posts: 13,898 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I can see her deserving half of what was earned during the marriage but if she demands more than that then she's just a fatlady.
    ....................................................................................................
    Too old to live...too young to die...
  • fugawefugawe Member Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    At most, she's only entitled to half of what he's made since they got married.
  • Glock23ExpertGlock23Expert Member Posts: 1,031 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Where were they married, here or the UK? Is Heather Mills a British citizen as well? If they were married in the UK, the rule that the wife is entitled to half of the money gained since the marriage may not or may not be valid. I don't know the UK laws. Let's hear from Mond.
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    Phrased as a "Jeopardy" answer: What is, "Who Cares"?[;)]
  • tsavo303tsavo303 Member Posts: 8,913 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    funny part he is 64, like in his song
  • mondmond Member Posts: 6,458
    edited November -1
    That will teach the arrogant, useless Bast**d right, which self respecting musician tries to out do a dead chum, by trying to list his name over the rights of song titles written by a genius, lennon.[8D]

    mcCartney never done anything descent on his own, or since the fab 4 split ! [}:)]

    Don't think he'll miss the dosh either, do you??
  • scottm21166scottm21166 Member Posts: 20,723
    edited November -1
    McCartney is wierd. his songs suck.(especially this last album) and he didn't protect himself in spite of legal advise. You've got the Money,Pay the woman....Next
    oh, please retire from r&r you old brits are becomming a bit long in the tooth
  • TxsTxs Member Posts: 17,809 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Will he give up the rights to the song he penned after meeting her....I Saw Her Leaning There?[:D]
  • dcon12dcon12 Member Posts: 32,038 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by SaxonPig
    [if she demands more than that then she's just a fatlady.


    I have seen pictures, she is not fat. Don
Sign In or Register to comment.