In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
We're in the End Times
River Rat
Member Posts: 9,022 ✭
Lest anyone doubt, check this out from our lesser cousins in California:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,520659,00.html?test=latestnews
Hope I got the link right. We are losing the human race.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,520659,00.html?test=latestnews
Hope I got the link right. We are losing the human race.
Comments
That's just drugs.
PCP, specifically.
Mendoza has been arrested and charged with aggravated mayhem, torture and child cruelty. Police said Mendoza may have been on PCP at the time of the alleged offences. Mendoza's son has been placed in child protective services. Angelo Medoza was jailed and his bail was set at $1 million.
They should remove one of his eyes, and give it to his son.
Where was the mother?
http://www.snopes.com/horrors/drugs/facepeel.asp
I took the homicide investigation course from Vernon Geberth. It is a true story.
Little Angelo's mother, Desirae, had been to the apartment earlier to deliver a pizza. Her son was screaming, `Mommy, mommy, I want to go with you. I'm scared.' Desirae thought to herself, `Should I take him or leave him?' She left him there.thinking he was safe with his father. She. Left. Him. There.
Let's have a look at Mendoza Sr.'s priors.he has at least 22 prior criminal court cases, including a no contest plea in April 2006 on misdemeanor willful cruelty to a child, for which he served probation. And yet, he was granted full custody of little Angelo. Interesting.
Little Angelo is now blind. Doctors report that the boy's left eye and muscle were completely missing. His other eye was mutilated beyond repair. His mother stated that he is being cared for by her sister and is now doing fine.
Angelo Vidal Mendoza Sr., 34, is still recovering from his self-inflicted injuries and is listed in stable condition, unfortunately. It appears he was under the influence of a controlled substance *cough PCP cough* at the time. His bail has been set at $1 million and he's facing charges of torture, aggravated mayhem, and cruelty to a child. I say, let him have a go with the ax again.maybe this time, he'll do it right and aim a bit higher.
This woman, who popped out a child should be sterilized. [:(]
Doug
[xx(]
Some sick people in the world.
You gub'mint types should stay out of the lives of people free born and possessing all of their clean vital fluids.
He was probably on his own property, minding his own business with his own child and now you bleeding hearts want a free man to grovel to your hypocritical moral standards.
Yeah.
That told them !
Another example of idiocy, even while tongue-in-cheek.
You may want to try real, real hard to grasp the concept of someone committing a "bad-act" and requisite punishment for that act.
Even loosely tying this horrific "criminal" act to the chemo-therapy/intrusive gov't discussion, where I must say, you had your * handed to you, is ridiculous at best.
An abject failure in ability to grasp the concept and to separate liberty from criminal action.
God be with that child, no person should endure that.
I believe in a just God, and that beats karma any day. Sounds to me like some heads should roll at Family Services, or whatevey California calls it.
My heard breaks for the kid, though. He's the only innocent one in the family, and he's blind.
quote:Originally posted by lt496
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
You gub'mint types should stay out of the lives of people free born and possessing all of their clean vital fluids.
He was probably on his own property, minding his own business with his own child and now you bleeding hearts want a free man to grovel to your hypocritical moral standards.
Yeah.
That told them !
Another example of idiocy, even while tongue-in-cheek.
You may want to try real, real hard to grasp the concept of someone committing a "bad-act" and requisite punishment for that act.
Even loosely tying this horrific "criminal" act to the chemo-therapy/intrusive gov't discussion, where I must say, you had your * handed to you, is ridiculous at best.
An abject failure in ability to grasp the concept and to separate liberty from criminal action.
So one is blind and one is most likely doomed to death.
Who are you to decide which is better ?
I would prefer to have neither, and that is at least one place where we seem to differ. I will not choose to sacrifice children or anybody else to an idol of individualistic anarchism.
Gonna try to impose your philosophy and gub'mint rules on this ?
Pretty funny that you think you had your hands on any part of me to hand it to anybody. It was not the point to beat anyone on anything. That is why, once you made it claer that you had no intention to be intellectually honest and were simply playing to the crowd, I declined to play anymore.
And I am doing so, again, now.
Whatever.
quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
You gub'mint types should stay out of the lives of people free born and possessing all of their clean vital fluids.
He was probably on his own property, minding his own business with his own child and now you bleeding hearts want a free man to grovel to your hypocritical moral standards.
Yeah.
That told them !
Another example of idiocy, even while tongue-in-cheek.
You may want to try real, real hard to grasp the concept of someone committing a "bad-act" and requisite punishment for that act.
Even loosely tying this horrific "criminal" act to the chemo-therapy/intrusive gov't discussion, where I must say, you had your * handed to you, is ridiculous at best.
An abject failure in ability to grasp the concept and to separate liberty from criminal action.
Yep...