In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Einsteins theory
Big Sky Redneck
Member Posts: 19,752 ✭✭✭
Einstein developed and proved this remarkable formula; Energy = Mass x Speed of Light squared.
A brilliant genius as we all know.
Another lesser known of Einstein's formulas determined; if you were to strip naked and run around in a circle at the speed of 298 KM/sec (the speed of light) it could be possible for you to sodomize (screw) yourself.....!
Should you determine you are not physically capable of achieving that speed at your age, you can easily achieve the same result by voting Democrat in the Nov. 8, 2016 election
A brilliant genius as we all know.
Another lesser known of Einstein's formulas determined; if you were to strip naked and run around in a circle at the speed of 298 KM/sec (the speed of light) it could be possible for you to sodomize (screw) yourself.....!
Should you determine you are not physically capable of achieving that speed at your age, you can easily achieve the same result by voting Democrat in the Nov. 8, 2016 election
Comments
You done good.[:D]
the speed of light is 298 km per second? [:0]
It's very simple...
Common core math says that 298 km per second times the wind speed in Montana on Friday the 13th squared times the number of non-functioning brain cells Obama has = the speed of light which is 186000 miles per second.
Ain't you never had no book learnin reload999 [:D]
[;)][:D]
Its all algebra to me...
Energy = mass x velocity squared.
Therefore the maximum energy available from that bullet would be achieved by accelerating it to the maximum velocity possible.
The only practical way you can accelerate the bullet to the speed of light is to convert the mass into energy, and this formula tells us what that energy would be.
The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light.
Now, *.
Don
Brad Steele
"'Ask your Doctor if you are healthy enough for sex"
[;)][:D]
Just as a point of interest, I did ask my doctor (Who is also my best friend) that question and after careful thought he called his nurse in and asked her what she thought since she had all my charts.
He did it just to embarrass me but when she said she had work to do and should just * slap the both of us and stormed out his joke sort of back fired and the joke was on both of us.
Then he was inspired to discover his most important theory.
The theory of relativetitty. [8D]
Einstein developed and proved this remarkable formula; Energy = Mass x Speed of Light squared.
A brilliant genius as we all know.
Another lesser known of Einstein's formulas determined; if you were to strip naked and run around in a circle at the speed of 298 KM/sec (the speed of light) it could be possible for you to sodomize (screw) yourself.....!
Should you determine you are not physically capable of achieving that speed at your age, you can easily achieve the same result by voting Democrat in the Nov. 8, 2016 election
Actually, at the speed of light your location would be "everywhere", so you could be potentially sodomizing everyone at the same time, which as you pointed out, is the same as voting democrat.
(Damn, I'm getting a headache).
So you get several screws for the price of one.
Don't blame me, Einstein made the bagels, it's all his fault.
"'Ask your Doctor if you are healthy enough for sex"
[;)][:D]
[:D][:D][:D][:D]
the speed of light is 298 km per second? [:0]
redneck science. someone said it's the top speed on the odometer of a Porsche, so it must be the speed of light.
What is the energy of a bullet leaving a barrel"
Energy = mass x velocity squared.
Therefore the maximum energy available from that bullet would be achieved by accelerating it to the maximum velocity possible.
The only practical way you can accelerate the bullet to the speed of light is to convert the mass into energy, and this formula tells us what that energy would be.
The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light.
Now, *.
Donthere are two types of energy, Potential energy and Kinetic energy.
Potential energy, described by the equation Pe=M*V, is the energy atored in a body of mass due to its velocity to a position. given by the integral of F=M*V {0 through x} hence the resultant antiderivative is Pe=M*V, because ther eis no x term in the equation.
potential elergy may also be stored as a result of simple positional occuation in a gravitational field, electrical field, magnetic field, etc. most commonly gravitational.
Kinetic energy, described by the equation Ke=(1/2)*M*V^2, is the energy stored in a body of mass due to its acceleration to a velocity. given by the integral of F=*M*V (0 through v) hence the resultant antiderivative is Ke=(1/2)*M*V^2, because there is a v term in the equation.
the maximum energy of a bullet is determined by the maximum velicity, but because the actual mass-energy equivalence equation is E=SQRT((M*C^2)/(1-1/v)), we find that as velocity approaches C the denominator becomes vanishingly small, and the sum equation infinitely huge, therefore as the object approaches the speed of light it becomes infinitely massive, therefore it would require infinite energy to increase velocity to the speed of light, which therefore is impossible ultimately or, practically, not even tentatively.
if you were to translate mass into energy in an effort to increase velocity, the mass would have to dissipate entirely until no mass remains, to acheive the speed of light; whereupon the object no longer exists. again it is impossible.
irregardless of the fact that an object cannot accelerate to the speed of light, the statement "The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light" is false simply because M*V does not equal (1/2)*M*V^2 at any velocity.
unless, possibly, you insert the term * into the equation.
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
What is the energy of a bullet leaving a barrel"
Energy = mass x velocity squared.
Therefore the maximum energy available from that bullet would be achieved by accelerating it to the maximum velocity possible.
The only practical way you can accelerate the bullet to the speed of light is to convert the mass into energy, and this formula tells us what that energy would be.
The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light.
Now, *.
Donthere are two types of energy, Potential energy and Kinetic energy.
Potential energy, described by the equation Pe=M*V, is the energy atored in a body of mass due to its velocity to a position. given by the integral of F=M*V {0 through x} hence the resultant antiderivative is Pe=M*V, because ther eis no x term in the equation.
potential elergy may also be stored as a result of simple positional occuation in a gravitational field, electrical field, magnetic field, etc. most commonly gravitational.
Kinetic energy, described by the equation Ke=(1/2)*M*V^2, is the energy stored in a body of mass due to its acceleration to a velocity. given by the integral of F=*M*V (0 through v) hence the resultant antiderivative is Ke=(1/2)*M*V^2, because there is a v term in the equation.
the maximum energy of a bullet is determined by the maximum velicity, but because the actual mass-energy equivalence equation is E=SQRT((M*C^2)/(1-1/v)), we find that as velocity approaches C the denominator becomes vanishingly small, and the sum equation infinitely huge, therefore as the object approaches the speed of light it becomes infinitely massive, therefore it would require infinite energy to increase velocity to the speed of light, which therefore is impossible ultimately or, practically, not even tentatively.
if you were to translate mass into energy in an effort to increase velocity, the mass would have to dissipate entirely until no mass remains, to acheive the speed of light; whereupon the object no longer exists. again it is impossible.
irregardless of the fact that an object cannot accelerate to the speed of light, the statement "The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light" is false simply because M*V does not equal (1/2)*M*V^2 at any velocity.
unless, possibly, you insert the term * into the equation.
The (non)word "irregardless" renders the above seemingly knowledgeable detailed explanation of certain physical properties questionable.[8D]
quote:Originally posted by buschmaster
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
What is the energy of a bullet leaving a barrel"
Energy = mass x velocity squared.
Therefore the maximum energy available from that bullet would be achieved by accelerating it to the maximum velocity possible.
The only practical way you can accelerate the bullet to the speed of light is to convert the mass into energy, and this formula tells us what that energy would be.
The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light.
Now, *.
Donthere are two types of energy, Potential energy and Kinetic energy.
Potential energy, described by the equation Pe=M*V, is the energy atored in a body of mass due to its velocity to a position. given by the integral of F=M*V {0 through x} hence the resultant antiderivative is Pe=M*V, because ther eis no x term in the equation.
potential elergy may also be stored as a result of simple positional occuation in a gravitational field, electrical field, magnetic field, etc. most commonly gravitational.
Kinetic energy, described by the equation Ke=(1/2)*M*V^2, is the energy stored in a body of mass due to its acceleration to a velocity. given by the integral of F=*M*V (0 through v) hence the resultant antiderivative is Ke=(1/2)*M*V^2, because there is a v term in the equation.
the maximum energy of a bullet is determined by the maximum velicity, but because the actual mass-energy equivalence equation is E=SQRT((M*C^2)/(1-1/v)), we find that as velocity approaches C the denominator becomes vanishingly small, and the sum equation infinitely huge, therefore as the object approaches the speed of light it becomes infinitely massive, therefore it would require infinite energy to increase velocity to the speed of light, which therefore is impossible ultimately or, practically, not even tentatively.
if you were to translate mass into energy in an effort to increase velocity, the mass would have to dissipate entirely until no mass remains, to acheive the speed of light; whereupon the object no longer exists. again it is impossible.
irregardless of the fact that an object cannot accelerate to the speed of light, the statement "The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light" is false simply because M*V does not equal (1/2)*M*V^2 at any velocity.
unless, possibly, you insert the term * into the equation.
The (non)word "irregardless" renders the above seemingly knowledgeable detailed explanation of certain physical properties questionable.[8D]
indubitably!
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
What is the energy of a bullet leaving a barrel"
Energy = mass x velocity squared.
Therefore the maximum energy available from that bullet would be achieved by accelerating it to the maximum velocity possible.
The only practical way you can accelerate the bullet to the speed of light is to convert the mass into energy, and this formula tells us what that energy would be.
The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light.
Now, *.
Donthere are two types of energy, Potential energy and Kinetic energy.
Potential energy, described by the equation Pe=M*V, is the energy atored in a body of mass due to its velocity to a position. given by the integral of F=M*V {0 through x} hence the resultant antiderivative is Pe=M*V, because ther eis no x term in the equation.
potential elergy may also be stored as a result of simple positional occuation in a gravitational field, electrical field, magnetic field, etc. most commonly gravitational.
Kinetic energy, described by the equation Ke=(1/2)*M*V^2, is the energy stored in a body of mass due to its acceleration to a velocity. given by the integral of F=*M*V (0 through v) hence the resultant antiderivative is Ke=(1/2)*M*V^2, because there is a v term in the equation.
the maximum energy of a bullet is determined by the maximum velicity, but because the actual mass-energy equivalence equation is E=SQRT((M*C^2)/(1-1/v)), we find that as velocity approaches C the denominator becomes vanishingly small, and the sum equation infinitely huge, therefore as the object approaches the speed of light it becomes infinitely massive, therefore it would require infinite energy to increase velocity to the speed of light, which therefore is impossible ultimately or, practically, not even tentatively.
if you were to translate mass into energy in an effort to increase velocity, the mass would have to dissipate entirely until no mass remains, to acheive the speed of light; whereupon the object no longer exists. again it is impossible.
irregardless of the fact that an object cannot accelerate to the speed of light, the statement "The potential energy of mass is equal to the kinetic energy of that mass when accelerated to the speed of light" is false simply because M*V does not equal (1/2)*M*V^2 at any velocity.
unless, possibly, you insert the term * into the equation.
Close, but no cigar. Potential energy is not M*V, that is momentum. Pe = mgh which is the integral of F=ma over x from 0 to h.
I won't even go into the issues with your calculation of kinetic energies while trying to correct for relativistic velocities.
I do like the fact that at least you are pretty close and trying to learn something that 99% of the people out there wouldn't even bother with because they think it's useless (no it is not).
did you forget that momentum is an expression of potential energy?
p.s. not trying to learn it, I did learn it. took 2 semesters of calculus level physics and this stuff was covered right at the beginning of the book. most elementary.
when in a gravitational field, and a different equation when in an electric field, and a different equation when in a magnetic field, and a different equation when held by a spring, or another yet for a rubber band, yada yada
did you forget that momentum is an expression of potential energy?
p.s. not trying to learn it, I did learn it. took 2 semesters of calculus level physics and this stuff was covered right at the beginning of the book. most elementary.
Actually momentum is related to kinetic energy. It is the differential of total energy, however, since potential energy is a constant relative to velocity, the d/dv of total energy drops the potential energy term and only acts on kinetic energy which is 1/2 mv^2 in classical physics.
It is easy to see when someone is losing a discussion when they justify their position by the education they have received. Was it Laugh-In or Hee-Haw that had the telephone operator tht would announce to the caller that she was a "High School Gradu ATE"? Or just the other day two people were giving different points of view- one determined that he was losing, so his next response was "I have a PhD in ..." LOSER!!!
I DO have a PhD in nuclear physics and if that makes me a loser then I think you need to evaluate where you are in your life.
NNNNOOOOWWWW, I'm REALLY impressed
I've evaluated my position in Life-
I have no dog in this fight, from my viewpoint I can recognize Male Bovine Excrement when I see it;' and to restate my point,
When the content of one's response goes from the facts of the topic and yields to personal support- based on paper received- the debater has LOST.
So, let's get this back to regular guy level instead of trying to see who has the longest shlong in edumacations.
A round nosed .30 bullet weighing 180 grains fired at 2800 feet per second hits a deers shoulder 300 yards away. Since the bullet struck bone exactly what will the circumferance of the damaged area be? Like my soelling of that word that in a round about (pun) way means circle? [:D]
We know what the energy will be at point of impact so no need to show off there. I want to know how much meat is destroyed! [8D]
quote:Originally posted by buschmaster
when in a gravitational field, and a different equation when in an electric field, and a different equation when in a magnetic field, and a different equation when held by a spring, or another yet for a rubber band, yada yada
did you forget that momentum is an expression of potential energy?
p.s. not trying to learn it, I did learn it. took 2 semesters of calculus level physics and this stuff was covered right at the beginning of the book. most elementary.
Actually momentum is related to kinetic energy. It is the differential of total energy, however, since potential energy is a constant relative to velocity, the d/dv of total energy drops the potential energy term and only acts on kinetic energy which is 1/2 mv^2 in classical physics.
I already spelled out how momentum (that expression of potential energy) is related to kinetic energy.
I already showed how kinetic energy is the antiderivative of potential energy, not vice versa.
as a PhD you should know those things and easily catch errors like the ones you made. either you don't have a PhD or I need to find out where they're hiring PhD's like you so I can get a job!
[?] hmmm [?]
I already spelled out how momentum (that expression of potential energy) is related to kinetic energy.
I already showed how kinetic energy is the antiderivative of potential energy, not vice versa.
as a PhD you should know those things and easily catch errors like the ones you made. either you don't have a PhD or I need to find out where they're hiring PhD's like you so I can get a job!
No form of potential energy is velocity dependent no matter what type of field it exists in. Velocity dependent energy only contributes to kinetic energy.
I'm never wrong, once I thought I was, but I was mistaken.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
NNNNOOOOWWWW, I'm REALLY impressed
I've evaluated my position in Life-
I have no dog in this fight, from my viewpoint I can recognize Male Bovine Excrement when I see it;' and to restate my point,
When the content of one's response goes from the facts of the topic and yields to personal support- based on paper received- the debater has LOST.
You're such a master debater. I'd like to continue this discussion, but I refuse to enter a battle of wits against an unarmed man.
I bet you're a double-naught spy, too.
How did you know. I'm 006, one shy of big time.
quote:Originally posted by buschmaster
I already spelled out how momentum (that expression of potential energy) is related to kinetic energy.
I already showed how kinetic energy is the antiderivative of potential energy, not vice versa.
as a PhD you should know those things and easily catch errors like the ones you made. either you don't have a PhD or I need to find out where they're hiring PhD's like you so I can get a job!
No form of potential energy is velocity dependent no matter what type of field it exists in. Velocity dependent energy only contributes to kinetic energy.
I'm never wrong, once I thought I was, but I was mistaken.
well if you want to see how that is, you might reread what you read.
[/quote]
Therefore you were wrong.
So your statement is wrong.
So that's twice.
quote:Originally posted by AzAfshin
quote:Originally posted by buschmaster
I already spelled out how momentum (that expression of potential energy) is related to kinetic energy.
I already showed how kinetic energy is the antiderivative of potential energy, not vice versa.
as a PhD you should know those things and easily catch errors like the ones you made. either you don't have a PhD or I need to find out where they're hiring PhD's like you so I can get a job!
No form of potential energy is velocity dependent no matter what type of field it exists in. Velocity dependent energy only contributes to kinetic energy.
I'm never wrong, once I thought I was, but I was mistaken.
well if you want to see how that is, you might reread what you read.
I did re-read and still will tell you that Pe is not equal to M*V as you stated originally.
Frankly, I'm bored with this discussion. I tried to bring some knowledge to the discussion and keep getting criticized for having a degree. So, I give up. As they say, never try to teach a pig to sing...