In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

US hits debt limit on March 16!

serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭
edited March 2015 in General Discussion
And The Federal Reserve hasn't even raise the interest rates yet!

Of course why pay the bills when you can control the amount you can loan and still control the interest rate. Only the buyers of such financial instruments could cause a problem but then there's always a lender of the last resort to save the day you say!

Isn't the debt ceiling already programed to float now?



serf
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102459024


In a Friday morning letter to House Speaker John Boehner and other House and Senate leaders, Lew said that his office will be forced to suspend the issuance of State and Local Government Series securities on Mar. 13 unless the debt limit is raised.

Of course the Republicans are adding debt to the budget too!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/07/affordable-care-act_n_6431102.html

Comments

  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,115 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I am tired of the repetitive drama over debt limits, we all know they are going to raise the debt limit again.

    Anybody out there think otherwise?.

    I for one realize many are concerned over our tremendous debt, however the powers to be don't share our views.
  • ChrisInTempeChrisInTempe Member Posts: 15,562
    edited November -1
    The debt limit is a political slight of hand left over from WW1. It does not limit debt or spending. It limits the paying of debts taken on already.

    It should be abolished.
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
    The debt limit is a political slight of hand left over from WW1. It does not limit debt or spending. It limits the paying of debts taken on already.

    It should be abolished.


    It should not be abolished, it should be respected.

    Federal revenue is projected to be $ 3.3 Trillion for FY 2015.

    We first spent more than this in FY 2009.

    To limit spending to current receipts would mean cutting $ 400 billion from projected spending for FY 2015. This is less than 10%.

    Respect the limit. Across the board 10% cut in Federal outlays. Tough medicine for a few years, but we would then grow the budget as revenue increases.

    There is not one program or agency in the Federal Government that cannot afford a 10% cut, including defense.

    Or, if you want to wait for 5 years, freeze Federal Spending at current levels until revenue catches up.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    What about Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security? a 10% cut in that Government program too?

    Not paying our troops? a 10% cut in retirement or healthcare to Federal retirees?

    Because those are the things that seem to always come up every time they talk about cutting something.

    Means testing Social Security and Medicare?

    quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
    quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
    The debt limit is a political slight of hand left over from WW1. It does not limit debt or spending. It limits the paying of debts taken on already.

    It should be abolished.


    It should not be abolished, it should be respected.

    Federal revenue is projected to be $ 3.3 Trillion for FY 2015.

    We first spent more than this in FY 2009.

    To limit spending to current receipts would mean cutting $ 400 billion from projected spending for FY 2015. This is less than 10%.

    Respect the limit. Across the board 10% cut in Federal outlays. Tough medicine for a few years, but we would then grow the budget as revenue increases.

    There is not one program or agency in the Federal Government that cannot afford a 10% cut, including defense.

    Or, if you want to wait for 5 years, freeze Federal Spending at current levels until revenue catches up.
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • Dads3040Dads3040 Member Posts: 13,552 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think Don makes a good point. There is very likely not a single department of the federal government that doesn't waste 10% of its funds.

    Worried about SS? 20 years ago, people receiving SSI were 4% of the total SS recipients, and now they are 25%? Those are people who didn't pay enough into the system to qualify for regular SS payments. Disability payments and retirement benefits to immigrants who came here as elderly relatives are very large costs.

    Means testing Medicare and Medicaid may or may not be necessary if the waste, fraud, and abuse is dealt with. Start with that simple fact, and see where we are.

    There are something like 57 federal bureaucracies that administer food assistance programs. There might just be some overlap and redundancy there.

    If we allow any effort to reform the federal government and its spending to be derailed by the mere mention of someone's Sacred Cow, we get nowhere.
  • shilowarshilowar Member Posts: 38,811 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    No fears they will blow right past it!!! Its not like we are ever gonna pay it back anyways.
  • ChrisInTempeChrisInTempe Member Posts: 15,562
    edited November -1
    The debt limit is utter and total cow cookies. It was a political parlor trick intended to fool voters the instant it was dreamed up to sell war bonds a hundred freak'n years ago. Without exception every single majority and minority party has maintained the parlor trick over that time. All while knowing full well the only thing it accomplishes is to divert attention from spending.

    Why do people have so much difficulty comprehending this? The Debt Limit is not a Debt Limit. You cannot observe a limit that isn't a limit other than in name only.

    Congress determines the budget and spending is to be paid for. That is where the problem is to be found. When a "Debt Limit" is reached it is after the fact, the spending already took place.

    Take away their magic trick, their shell game, the extra ace's hidden up their sleeves. Killing off the false debt limit is but one small step to forcing honesty in budgets.
  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Since my birthday is the 17th I would consider it a wonderful gift if I awoke on that morning and learned they shut the Federal Government down.
  • wifetrainedwifetrained Member Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    We'll get our obligatory dog and pony show prior to hitting the limit and then "AT THE LAST MINUTE", TAAA DAHHHH, our illustrious leaders will save the day, accomplishing nothing in the process.
  • jonkjonk Member Posts: 10,121
    edited November -1
    Forget 10 percent. I'm sure if they let me look at the books I could find some stuff to cut. 25% at least. Even if Nancy Pelosi couldn't. I'll even do it cheap. Say, $100k for my time?
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
    The debt limit is utter and total cow cookies. It was a political parlor trick intended to fool voters the instant it was dreamed up to sell war bonds a hundred freak'n years ago. Without exception every single majority and minority party has maintained the parlor trick over that time. All while knowing full well the only thing it accomplishes is to divert attention from spending.

    Why do people have so much difficulty comprehending this? The Debt Limit is not a Debt Limit. You cannot observe a limit that isn't a limit other than in name only.

    Congress determines the budget and spending is to be paid for. That is where the problem is to be found. When a "Debt Limit" is reached it is after the fact, the spending already took place.

    Take away their magic trick, their shell game, the extra ace's hidden up their sleeves. Killing off the false debt limit is but one small step to forcing honesty in budgets.



    No one believes it being treated as an actual limit to spending, so it is no parlor trick, or if it is, it is one that fools no one.

    It performs the valuable function, however, of pointing out every so often how out of control our Federal Spending is. This, for no other reason, is reason enough to keep it.

    With any luck, we may someday vote in a Congress that puts America ahead of Party and Power. Absent this type of principled vote, it may take a 'Debt of Honor' style purging of government to accomplish this. Frankly either method would be fine with me.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,437 ******
    edited November -1
    quote-no-free-people-ever-existed-or-can-ever-exist-without-keeping-the-purse-strings-in-their-own-john-dickinson-341391.jpg
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • dakotashooter2dakotashooter2 Member Posts: 6,186
    edited November -1
    Every year the Federal government has 1000s of grants that go unapplied for. Generally that money is just redistributed so that it is used. How about just cutting off those grants to start with. It might not be much but it is a start.
  • dakotashooter2dakotashooter2 Member Posts: 6,186
    edited November -1
    Every year the Federal government has 1000s of grants that go unapplied for. Generally that money is just redistributed so that it is used. How about just cutting off those grants to start with. It might not be much but it is a start.
Sign In or Register to comment.