In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Remington 1900 question

Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭
edited January 2017 in General Discussion
Picked this up yesterday.

Rem%201900_zpstd9u8ucl.jpg

S/N is in 301,000, so I would guess manufacturing date is 1905 -1906, but cannot find any firm information. If anyone has a link or knows, help would be appreciated.

Secondly, is there a limit on what type of ammo can be used in these? I wouldn't be using anything more than bird shot, the action is remarkably tight, and it locks up very solidly.

Lastly, pivoting the release lever puts on the safety. Didn't realize this until I brought it home. Seems to be an inconvenient feature. Is this something that is found on other shotguns of this era?

Thanks in advance for any input.

Don
Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

Brad Steele

Comments

  • Ricci WrightRicci Wright Member Posts: 8,259 ✭✭
    edited November -1
  • eastbankeastbank Member Posts: 4,052 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    i have a rem 1900 double barrel 12ga with 32" F&F steel barrels made about the same time as yours, mine is in very good condition and i shoot it with low brass 0ne oz #7.5,s and did manage to shoot a 25-25 at trap after getting used to the drop in the stock. and it does have the safety that comes back on when you open it, most double barrels do that. you can deactivate it. they have what i think is the best lock up of any double barrel made. eastbank.
  • Dads3040Dads3040 Member Posts: 13,552 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Nice looking SxS, Don.
  • montanajoemontanajoe Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 60,206 ******
    edited November -1
    That is sweet,,[8D][8D][8D][8D]
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thanks for the comments.

    It is blued steel, and the finish looks to be original or a very old refinish. There are a few dings, but no pitting inside the barrels or on the surface of the shotgun.

    After reviewing what comes up online, I am a little surprised to see that there is nothing stamped on that barrels anywhere, nor are there any letters on the frame underneath the barrels.

    Being as the 1900 was kind of a bargain basement version of the 1894, I can understand why records may not have been as complete as with other models.

    That said, for under $ 250.00 it is not a steal, but seems to be a reasonable value. Once the temperature gets above 40 I will have to see how well it shoots.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    Are they replacement barrels ???

    I have never seen unmarked barrels on a Remington.


    Don't know. The rib top has 'Remington Arms, Ilion NY' stamped into it, so if someone replaced the barrels, they transferred that from the original barrels, and did a great job of fitting the whole thing back together. There are plenty of worn and browning areas on the barrels as well, and if they are replacements, I would think it was done a long time ago.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • eastbankeastbank Member Posts: 4,052 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    my remington 1900 serial number 336627 has remington armes co.ilion NY USA on the rib, and ///KF9 on the bottom of both barrels, on the bottom of the locking lug the numbers 48-48. the assembly number 6982 is on the receiver and barrels. i have hunted and shot trap with mine and have done quite well with it, taking into account the amount of drop in the butt stock. mr myopic.
  • TRAP55TRAP55 Member Posts: 8,292 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Don, keep in mind when it was made, only brass and paper shells were being made. The paper shells had a roll crimp holding a cardboard seal. Chambers may be 2.75", but not the same length as modern 2.75". Modern plastic shells with a star crimp will open up the crimp into the forcing cone, causing a pressure spike. Not enough to go blow it up, but it sure beats the hell out of the action.
  • dcon12dcon12 Member Posts: 32,036 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by TRAP55
    Don, keep in mind when it was made, only brass and paper shells were being made. The paper shells had a roll crimp holding a cardboard seal. Chambers may be 2.75", but not the same length as modern 2.75". Modern plastic shells with a star crimp will open up the crimp into the forcing cone, causing a pressure spike. Not enough to go blow it up, but it sure beats the hell out of the action.


    Yes, you sent me some 410 inserts for mine. I still have yet to shoot it. Don
  • TRAP55TRAP55 Member Posts: 8,292 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dcon12
    quote:Originally posted by TRAP55
    Don, keep in mind when it was made, only brass and paper shells were being made. The paper shells had a roll crimp holding a cardboard seal. Chambers may be 2.75", but not the same length as modern 2.75". Modern plastic shells with a star crimp will open up the crimp into the forcing cone, causing a pressure spike. Not enough to go blow it up, but it sure beats the hell out of the action.


    Yes, you sent me some 410 inserts for mine. I still have yet to shoot it. Don

    Well dammit, was I supposed to send the ammo too?[:0] I'll see if I still have your snail mail addy and fix that oversight, so you won't have anymore excuses.[:)]
  • Old-ColtsOld-Colts Member Posts: 22,697 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by TRAP55
    quote:Originally posted by dcon12
    quote:Originally posted by TRAP55
    Don, keep in mind when it was made, only brass and paper shells were being made. The paper shells had a roll crimp holding a cardboard seal. Chambers may be 2.75", but not the same length as modern 2.75". Modern plastic shells with a star crimp will open up the crimp into the forcing cone, causing a pressure spike. Not enough to go blow it up, but it sure beats the hell out of the action.Yes, you sent me some 410 inserts for mine. I still have yet to shoot it. DonWell dammit, was I supposed to send the ammo too?[:0] I'll see if I still have your snail mail addy and fix that oversight, so you won't have anymore excuses.[:)]It might be better it you took the ammo to him and shoot it for him too!

    If you can't feel the music; it's only pink noise!

  • TRAP55TRAP55 Member Posts: 8,292 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Bill, as long ago as that's been, I'll just mail it to him, I don't want to risk an * kickin.[:D]
  • Old-ColtsOld-Colts Member Posts: 22,697 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    [:D][:D]

    If you can't feel the music; it's only pink noise!

  • dcon12dcon12 Member Posts: 32,036 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Y'all realize I can read this crap!Don
  • Old-ColtsOld-Colts Member Posts: 22,697 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dcon12
    Y'all realize I can read this crap!DonReally? I figured someone read it to you and explained it.

    If you can't feel the music; it's only pink noise!

  • dcon12dcon12 Member Posts: 32,036 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Old-Colts
    quote:Originally posted by dcon12
    Y'all realize I can read this crap!DonReally? I figured someone read it to you and explained it.


    That hurts! I may never be the same. Don
  • gartmangartman Member Posts: 660 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    According to "Remington Double Shotguns" by Charles Semmer it was made in 1900.
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,690 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by TRAP55
    Don, keep in mind when it was made, only brass and paper shells were being made. The paper shells had a roll crimp holding a cardboard seal. Chambers may be 2.75", but not the same length as modern 2.75". Modern plastic shells with a star crimp will open up the crimp into the forcing cone, causing a pressure spike. Not enough to go blow it up, but it sure beats the hell out of the action.


    Thank you for this, Trap55. I probably won't shoot this a whole lot, so it sounds like it would be worth it to purchase the 'vintage' shot shells for it.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • fugawefugawe Member Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    http://www.remingtonsociety.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=21693
    Here is some info that may help. Your barrels may have been replaced. Mine had matching serial #'s on the frame, barrels and stock. It has 2-1/2" chambers, so use either 2-1/2" loads or paper 2-3/4" with discs.
Sign In or Register to comment.