In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Kelly Ann Conway DESTROYS Chuck this morning
mag00
Member Posts: 4,719 ✭✭
on meet the press.
She shut his * down for his negative injection of commentary. She nipped it in the bud. Each and every time he did a biased injection with trickery of questions, she stopped him in his tracks and he is visibly shaken.
Good for her. She basically said "The press will report honestly or not be welcome".
She shut his * down for his negative injection of commentary. She nipped it in the bud. Each and every time he did a biased injection with trickery of questions, she stopped him in his tracks and he is visibly shaken.
Good for her. She basically said "The press will report honestly or not be welcome".
Comments
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/alternative-facts-are-not-facts-theyre-falsehoods-chuck-todd-battles-kellyanne-conway/
Who's Chuck?
Chuck Farley.
Love her.
Hate him.
Would have loved to watch her eviscerate Todd boy.
Sorry I missed it.
Love her.
Hate him.
Would have loved to watch her eviscerate Todd boy.
i posted the link above
What she basically did was signal Todd and all others she has discussed matters with in the past was to let them know the gloves are off.
If they want to play their spin the tail on the donkey routine she will not treat them like she did when she had to.
She will as the Brits say "Giv'it'em back
She certainly showed Chuck she can push back with the best of them.
My guess is he will be better prepared next time and choose both his words and his smirks more carefully.
She won this round but these liberal spokespeople will not take this lying down, Lying yes, just not down
"Fools learn from their own mistakes. I learn from the mistakes of others"
Otto von Bismarck
May lose some friends on Facebook.
quote:I feel like ? am in need of hearing aids.
Ones that will include a cow cookies filter.
First day out of the block and we are dealing with this. I understand that facts will be twisted by every administration, the previous one included. However, when you are called out by one of the most reliable and respected news sources on a ridicuously easy to verify fact, own it and move on! The comment she made about "rethinking" their relationship with Meet the Press as a result of being called out is chilling, and does not bode well.
One like this one supporting the women's march and not seeing what they are really about.
I don't watch those I agree with I watch those I disagree with so I watch "Meet the Press"
What she basically did was signal Todd and all others she has discussed matters with in the past was to let them know the gloves are off.
If they want to play their spin the tail on the donkey routine she will not treat them like she did when she had to.
She will as the Brits say "Giv'it'em back
She certainly showed Chuck she can push back with the best of them.
My guess is he will be better prepared next time and choose both his words and his smirks more carefully.
She won this round but these liberal spokespeople will not take this lying down, Lying yes, just not down
I think the team will hold strong. The media can have their tantrums, but will be confined to their room until they behave. I do not think there will be any wiggle room.
Once they see reputable news outlets getting the perks and privilege of press passes, they will have to learn to behave or forever be cast as the tabloids of today. She did not mince words whatsoever. She told him flat out to quit biasing the listeners with loaded questions. She then continued to ignore his prodding until he could behave, and he ended the interview. If Chuck has any conscience he is going to ponder his words and tactics. If he is the professional he thinks he is, Kelly's words will sink in and he will become a better person for it.
I have been wondering why we don't talk about the evil media giant Murdoch and his agenda and who funds him and his motivations.
I have a feeling Trump is quite aware.
quote:Originally posted by Wulfmann
I don't watch those I agree with I watch those I disagree with so I watch "Meet the Press"
What she basically did was signal Todd and all others she has discussed matters with in the past was to let them know the gloves are off.
If they want to play their spin the tail on the donkey routine she will not treat them like she did when she had to.
She will as the Brits say "Giv'it'em back
She certainly showed Chuck she can push back with the best of them.
My guess is he will be better prepared next time and choose both his words and his smirks more carefully.
She won this round but these liberal spokespeople will not take this lying down, Lying yes, just not down
I think the team will hold strong. The media can have their tantrums, but will be confined to their room until they behave. I do not think there will be any wiggle room.
Once they see reputable news outlets getting the perks and privilege of press passes, they will have to learn to behave or forever be cast as the tabloids of today. She did not mince words whatsoever. She told him flat out to quit biasing the listeners with loaded questions. She then continued to ignore his prodding until he could behave, and he ended the interview. If Chuck has any conscience he is going to ponder his words and tactics. If he is the professional he thinks he is, Kelly's words will sink in and he will become a better person for it.
I have been wondering why we don't talk about the evil media giant Murdoch and his agenda and who funds him and his motivations.
I have a feeling Trump is quite aware.
I for one, LOVE IT!!
That is the role of a "free press". If trump wants to lie, he can continue to tweet. But he (and any president) must be called out on lies.
quote:Originally posted by Marc1301
Who's Chuck?
Chuck Farley.
Actually, it's Chuck U Farley.
The medias job is to report fact. Not to parrot a press release. Thor job is to verify, and "alternative facts" are not facts.
That is the role of a "free press". If trump wants to lie, he can continue to tweet. But he (and any president) must be called out on lies.
What fact is there? Care to show'official attendance' numbers?
Otherwise, you are simply another uninformed tool who thinks there are such a thing. Hint: all the attendance numbers are estimates from various sources.
You knew that, right?
Chucks * All over Media Stage
Thank You ......
WAY TO GO KELLY "I'm Gonna Enjoy the Next 4 years+"[:D][:D][^]
Woody
went from 2 million to 400,000 then 600,000-1,000,000 +/- 20%
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/22/us/politics/womens-march-trump-crowd-estimates.html?_r=1
Her answer should have been, "WGAF" The photos could have been taken at different times, for example, 0900 vs 1200. The Trump administration should admit there may have been more bodies for his inauguration, but, "so what?" Weather forecast, violence potential, etc, may have played a role. It will never be known.
I admire Kelly Ann Conway, and think she will have a higher position in this administration, but she should have told hinm to "f" off.
The medias job is to report fact. Not to parrot a press release. Thor job is to verify, and "alternative facts" are not facts.
That is the role of a "free press". If trump wants to lie, he can continue to tweet. But he (and any president) must be called out on lies.
If you think that the "press" has acted to report the facts during the last oh say 10 years, you are sadly misinformed, living in a cave, or are the new DNP leader.
Margaret Thatcher
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
Mark Twain
I'm sorry, I'm pro-Kelly Ann Conway, and pro- Trump, but I don't think she "DESTROYED" anyone. I see these things on Pro-Trump sites---she "annihilated", "decimated", etc. I usually dismiss any of these outright. She avoided answering the original- dick-headed question.
Her answer should have been, "WGAF" The photos could have been taken at different times, for example, 0900 vs 1200. The Trump administration should admit there may have been more bodies for his inauguration, but, "so what?" Weather forecast, violence potential, etc, may have played a role. It will never be known.
I admire Kelly Ann Conway, and think she will have a higher position in this administration, but she should have told hinm to "f" off.
dont go bringing common sense to the debate there is no room for it, everyone knows trump had 3,000 people and wimans had 30,000,000 [:D]
We defy anyone who challenges our count to a wrestling match.
How about opening your eyes, as opposed to listening to trumps heart or believing alternative facts.
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/01/22/us/politics/womens-march-trump-crowd-estimates.html?_r=1
As has been stated, SFB, those are all estimates. You said you were going to provide facts. Even someone as slow as you appear to be can understand the difference between an estimate and a fact, right?
BTW, the photo they show for Trump's inauguration was taken several hours before the ceremony. I was watching the whole thing. Now why do you suppose these folks are showing a demonstrably false picture?
quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
The medias job is to report fact. Not to parrot a press release. Thor job is to verify, and "alternative facts" are not facts.
That is the role of a "free press". If trump wants to lie, he can continue to tweet. But he (and any president) must be called out on lies.
What fact is there? Care to show'official attendance' numbers?
Otherwise, you are simply another uninformed tool who thinks there are such a thing. Hint: all the attendance numbers are estimates from various sources.
You knew that, right?
I'm not sure if you recently became an *, or have always been an *.
He was visibly shaken and tried to keep composure. Mama Bear spanked him good. You can try and rally back from that, but she will not cave in. They will be sitting on the outside looking in. When they learn to play nice, they may be allowed to participate.
Chuck likes to steamroller over whoever he interviews, she was not having any part of that.
quote:Todd got more and more frustrated as he kept confronting Conway over the press conference, asking, "What was the motive to have this ridiculous litigation of crowd size?"
Conway called him out yet again, telling him, "Your job is not to call things ridiculous. You're supposed to be a newsperson."
Well one old Friend has cut me from facebook.
If I used Facebook... I'd (is the term) 'Friend you' and be better for it.
But I don't use Facebook, so I guess that ain't happenin'... [;)]
quote:Originally posted by Dads3040
quote:Originally posted by Jgreen
The medias job is to report fact. Not to parrot a press release. Thor job is to verify, and "alternative facts" are not facts.
That is the role of a "free press". If trump wants to lie, he can continue to tweet. But he (and any president) must be called out on lies.
What fact is there? Care to show'official attendance' numbers?
Otherwise, you are simply another uninformed tool who thinks there are such a thing. Hint: all the attendance numbers are estimates from various sources.
You knew that, right?
I'm not sure if you recently became an *, or have always been an *.
I have a low tolerance for leftists and liars trolling around.
If you have a problem with that, good for you.
You are welcome to show the 'official attendance numbers' jgreen seems to think the has provided.
Brad Steele
Conway can often be very evasive in her answers. It seems to work, though.
In the first place, the question was a "Do you still beat your wife" question. If you answer you buy into the premise of the question, which is false.
So to respond to other questions a Libtard will not ask is perfectly reasonable.
But you know that, I am surprised by your response.
Margaret Thatcher
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
Mark Twain
I don't care what the POTUS says or his staff said or Chuck whats-his-name says about the size of the crowd, the people that love them, the size of their hands or pee-pee.
I care about what gets done in this nation to bring our troops home, stop deficit spending, stop illegal immigration and exposing/ prosecuting the Elite corruption in DC.
The rest of it is just fluff to fill the 24/7 "news" (gag, choke, puke) cycle.
It has so far...
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/trump-campaign-moscow-russia-contacts-231168
Report: Trump's team had contacts with Moscow during campaign
By Louis Nelson
11/10/16 08:42 AM EST
old fake news, do try to keep up
I'm sorry, I'm pro-Kelly Ann Conway, and pro- Trump, but I don't think she "DESTROYED" anyone. I see these things on Pro-Trump sites---she "annihilated", "decimated", etc. I usually dismiss any of these outright. She avoided answering the original- dick-headed question.
I agree I watched for a bit, but quickly grew weary. Looked like a couple children bickering. If Trump wants to be a hero, he needs to rise above these petty "fights". Just ignore these clowns, and put energy into real things, like scrapping GCA 1968.
Conway can often be very evasive in her answers. It seems to work, though.
That's true. On another TV report the estimate said to be given to trump was 1.5 million.
Think about this,, IT WAS NOT a press conference,, it was a Press A** Eating. They weren't allowed to ask Jack.
Kelly Ann asked about the press report saying the bust of Martin Luther King was removed. OH,, we fixed that,, back to the topic. Fixed or not, that reporter will PROBABLY never set foot in the Whitehouse again. At least I hope so.
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
Conway can often be very evasive in her answers. It seems to work, though.
In the first place, the question was a "Do you still beat your wife" question. If you answer you buy into the premise of the question, which is false.
So to respond to other questions a Libtard will not ask is perfectly reasonable.
But you know that, I am surprised by your response.
I didn't see this interview. I was going off her past past performances.
What was the question?
Brad Steele
quote:Originally posted by Alpine