In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

State Department staff en masse leaving

bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
edited January 2017 in General Discussion
Good. Double good!

The so-called professional career State Department employees have become entrenched and need to go. Fresh blood at the top will open new channels of thinking, new methods will be found and folks will soon realize the idea of these people being indispensable will be dashed for good.

I hope Trump can find some non political people from outside the beltway to bring in and fix the disaster left by Obama appointees and think-a-likes.

Comments

  • Sam06Sam06 Member Posts: 21,244 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    As a DoS contractor I would love to help them pack. Trump should do a Reagan/ATC striker job on them and Fire their *.
    RLTW

  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    In reading stories about the resignations the concern about security at Overseas Counselor Offices seems to be the main thrust of the whining from Lib/tards.

    Seems some hag and the same dolts that just resigned had a chance to up some security and chose not to so Americans died in Benghazi while Obama snoozed and Hillary did NOTHING.

    Grab the guy in the mail room and make him the head honcho; it can't be any worse than what we had. There are hundreds of people that can fill these positions; the fiefdoms created by the quitters needs busted up.
  • 1911a1-fan1911a1-fan Member Posts: 51,193 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    some libs are pushing it as an anti trump movement, but it is far from the truth


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FoRweH3D_w


    http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/26/politics/top-state-department-officials-asked-to-leave-by-trump-administration/index.html


    Washington (CNN)Two senior administration officials said Thursday that the Trump administration told four top State Department management officials that their services were no longer needed as part of an effort to "clean house" at Foggy Bottom.
    Patrick Kennedy, who served for nine years as the undersecretary for management, Assistant Secretaries for Administration and Consular Affairs Joyce Anne Barr and Michele Bond, and Ambassador Gentry Smith, director of the Office for Foreign Missions, were sent letters by the White House that their service was no longer required, the sources told CNN.

    All four, career officers serving in positions appointed by the President, submitted letters of resignation per tradition at the beginning of a new administration.
  • JunkballerJunkballer Member Posts: 9,295 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    [:D]...Bull Manure....you couldn't drag their * away from those high paying cushy jobs [;)]

    "Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee

  • ChrisStreettChrisStreett Member Posts: 3,847 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The swamp is draining.

    Sam06, lemme know if DSS is emptying out too. I'll get my gear together!
    "...dying ain't much of a living boy"-Josey Wales
  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    1911A1-fan

    I saw that and me thinks the surprise is the Trump administration accepted the resignations with a "thank you, have a nice life and a pat on the back, there's the door." [^][^][^][^][^]
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,105 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Need to bust up the federal and government unions. That would be the first step in cleaning up this mess. Once the unions are gone, the dead wood will no longer be protected or subsidized.

    Collective bargaining when it comes to government employment should be the decision of the voters, not Washington politicians.
  • nmyersnmyers Member Posts: 16,891 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Don't get excited, Bruce.

    The folks leaving are some of the 4,000 appointed federal jobs; their departure is normal when there is a change of administration. Yes, good riddance to parasites. But, the civil service employees aren't going anywhere. They are really needed, as they are the one who make any agency running, regardless of who is in charge.

    Sadly, because of the Draft Dodger's short sighted outlook, the federal hiring freeze is going to result in higher attrition among the civil service, making it less likely that those remaining will be as effective.

    Neal
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,404 ******
    edited November -1
    Looks like some of them were leaving no matter what and others were reassigned. So, what is the story/hoopla? Sounds like pretty boring stuff.zzzzzz
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • Dads3040Dads3040 Member Posts: 13,552 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by nmyers
    Don't get excited, Bruce.

    The folks leaving are some of the 4,000 appointed federal jobs; their departure is normal when there is a change of administration. Yes, good riddance to parasites. But, the civil service employees aren't going anywhere. They are really needed, as they are the one who make any agency running, regardless of who is in charge.

    Sadly, because of the Draft Dodger's short sighted outlook, the federal hiring freeze is going to result in higher attrition among the civil service, making it less likely that those remaining will be as effective.

    Neal

    Across the board, 85% of campaign contributions from federal government employees went to the Democrats. Garden Variety Public Employee Stooges.

    If a bunch of them leave, somehow I am sure we will muddle through.
  • nononsensenononsense Member Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I reality, with the hundreds of thousands of unreported, unemployed middle management folks who have taken it in the face for last eight years, I'm pretty certain that most of those 'civil service employees' could not only be replaced but the agencies would be better off with them leaving. No one is irreplaceable, it just might take some time to get them trained up and in line with the current administration.

    The IRS is a primary example of an agency needing a mass firing.

    Best.
  • mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    +10
    quote:Originally posted by chiefr
    Need to bust up the federal and government unions. That would be the first step in cleaning up this mess. Once the unions are gone, the dead wood will no longer be protected or subsidized.

    Collective bargaining when it comes to government employment should be the decision of the voters, not Washington politicians.
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well considering three or four Civil service employees to do the same job as for profit world I think we should be OK.



    quote:Originally posted by nmyers
    Don't get excited, Bruce.

    The folks leaving are some of the 4,000 appointed federal jobs; their departure is normal when there is a change of administration. Yes, good riddance to parasites. But, the civil service employees aren't going anywhere. They are really needed, as they are the one who make any agency running, regardless of who is in charge.

    Sadly, because of the Draft Dodger's short sighted outlook, the federal hiring freeze is going to result in higher attrition among the civil service, making it less likely that those remaining will be as effective.

    Neal
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • 47studebaker47studebaker Member Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by nononsense


    I reality, with the hundreds of thousands of unreported, unemployed middle management folks who have taken it in the face for last eight years, I'm pretty certain that most of those 'civil service employees' could not only be replaced but the agencies would be better off with them leaving. No one is irreplaceable, it just might take some time to get them trained up and in line with the current administration.

    The IRS is a primary example of an agency needing a mass firing.

    Best.




    After seeing several commercials on TV of someone saying "I owed $200,000 to the IRS but only had to give them $12,500 to settle because I used XYZ company". I want the guy or girl in the IRS that accepted that "deal" to get fired and jailed.
  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by 47studebaker
    quote:Originally posted by nononsense


    I reality, with the hundreds of thousands of unreported, unemployed middle management folks who have taken it in the face for last eight years, I'm pretty certain that most of those 'civil service employees' could not only be replaced but the agencies would be better off with them leaving. No one is irreplaceable, it just might take some time to get them trained up and in line with the current administration.

    The IRS is a primary example of an agency needing a mass firing.

    Best.




    After seeing several commercials on TV of someone saying "I owed $200,000 to the IRS but only had to give them $12,500 to settle because I used XYZ company". I want the guy or girl in the IRS that accepted that "deal" to get fired and jailed.


    WHY? You can not squeeze blood out of a turnip. Once people hit the bottom, their business gone, money gone and none left to pay taxes what good does it do to keep a boot on their necks?

    People that evade taxes do not get a break, people that owe taxes can be, in certain circumstances forgiven part of the debt if the possibility of the government collecting it is slim.
Sign In or Register to comment.