In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Much wailing and gnashing of teeth ...
jimdeere
Member, Moderator Posts: 26,237 ******
...for the abortionists today.
President Trump sent V.P. Pence to speak to the pro-life crowd. He did not mince words.
There is no doubt where the President and V.P.stand, now.
President Trump sent V.P. Pence to speak to the pro-life crowd. He did not mince words.
There is no doubt where the President and V.P.stand, now.
Comments
BUT, it wasn't funded by the general population.
Since the population has grown, there is a logical reason for abortion and population growth control.
HOWEVER, don't cry to me about "it's my body my choice" then make someone else foot the bill. Doesn't sound equal to me.
And don't minimize the unborn human to just a pile of cells. BE HONEST about it.
BUT as far as taxpayer funded abortion when a woman has six babies and is working on seven all being cared for by the tax payers I personally would have no problem paying for an abortion for #7 as preferred to paying for the kid for eighteen or more years. Or its lifetime when it ends up in Jail.
Sorry but unwanted babies raised in hell are not my idea of saving a life.
And I also have no desire to legislate what a woman can do with her body if she is paying for it.
Merc
quote:Originally posted by mogley98
I understand the moral implications of Right to life and I am not debating the religious or moral right or wrong.
BUT as far as taxpayer funded abortion when a woman has six babies and is working on seven all being cared for by the tax payers I personally would have no problem paying for an abortion for #7 as preferred to paying for the kid for eighteen or more years. Or its lifetime when it ends up in Jail.
Sorry but unwanted babies raised in hell are not my idea of saving a life.
And I also have no desire to legislate what a woman can do with her body if she is paying for it.
I understand the moral implications of Right to life and I am not debating the religious or moral right or wrong.
BUT as far as taxpayer funded abortion when a woman has six babies and is working on seven all being cared for by the tax payers I personally would have no problem paying for an abortion for #7 as preferred to paying for the kid for eighteen or more years. Or its lifetime when it ends up in Jail.
Sorry but unwanted babies raised in hell are not my idea of saving a life.
And I also have no desire to legislate what a woman can do with her body if she is paying for it.
Any moneys is making excuses. Child could very well grow up to find the cure for cancer.
But on a legal standpoint, the father must have a say in the destruction of his dna. And the new life should get a say in the decision as well. It's a contract. You add sperm to the egg, that is a contract for a third life form. Don't enter into the contract of raising a child if you do not want one.
The true and fair choice is before the contract is consummated.
[/quote]
But on a legal standpoint, the father must have a say in the destruction of his dna.
[/quote]
"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you,
and before you were born I consecrated you;
I appointed you a prophet to the nations."