In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

I could support this bill wahoooooooooooooo

TooBigTooBig Member Posts: 28,559 ✭✭✭
edited September 2010 in General Discussion
Least Expensive Bill of the Week
The Bill: H.R. 6134, To provide for a 10 percent reduction in pay for Members of Congress; to make Federal civilian employees subject to a period of mandatory unpaid leave, and to reduce appropriations for salaries and expenses for offices of the legislative branch, during fiscal year 2011; and for other purposes

Annualized Savings: $5.5 billion (first-year savings)

Congressman Mike Coffman (CO-6) introduced H.R. 6134. The bill would require federal civilian employees to take two non-consecutive furlough weeks in FY 2011. The only exceptions to the measure would be for reasons of national security, public health and safety, law enforcement, and any reason the President considers necessary.

The legislative branch would also be required to reduce costs through pay and budgetary cuts. Members of Congress would be paid 10 percent less in 2011 than in 2010. A provision in H.R. 6134 also calls for a reduction in salaries and expenses in legislative branch offices. Fiscal year allowances would not be permitted to exceed 96 percent of FY 2010's allowances and expenses for that office.

The cuts in federal personnel hours, district expenses, and Congressional raises would save taxpayers $5.5 billion. The bill is a one year measure.

Most Friended

Comments

  • storm6490storm6490 Member Posts: 8,010
    edited November -1
    that or hang the buzzards... which will happen first...
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    It doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell...
  • grumpygygrumpygy Member Posts: 48,464 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Don't trust them, They would just cut what the Military is getting paid and then go after Military retirement.
  • happyhooliganhappyhooligan Member Posts: 22 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by grumpygy
    Don't trust them, They would just cut what the Military is getting paid and then go after Military retirement.


    No doubt. The talking heads and think tanks are already talking about changing the military retirement system, when there are people making more on public assistance than some military retirees.
  • victorj19victorj19 Member Posts: 3,642 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    IMO it won't happen but is interesting concept.

    The only exceptions to the measure would be for reasons of national security, public health and safety, law enforcement, and any reason the President considers necessary.

    I don't think that includes DoD (national security). So, what's left:
    Dept of Energy
    Dept of Labor
    Social Security
    Dept of Education
    Dept of Justice (all of the attornies will sue to get their pay)
    HUD
    EPA
    Parts of HHS
    Dept of Interior (BLM, NPS, BIA, etc)
    Treasury (BATF, IRS, etc)
    Dept of Agriculture
    State Dept (Hillary would have to take 2 weeks off!)


    I keep hearing of the budget cuts coming for weapons systems and other DoD funding. We keep closing facilities (Base Realignment and Closure Act), competing more big dollar contracts. The competitive contract I signed last year should save the taxpayers at least $1.2B over the next 4 to 5 years alone.) 10s of Billions in cuts are coming.
  • fishkiller41fishkiller41 Member Posts: 50,608
    edited November -1
    I like the idea, their salaries need to be averaged to what they would make, if paid weekly, then ONLY PAID FOR THE TIME THEIR ACTUALLY THERE,WORKING...
Sign In or Register to comment.