In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
The US should pull out of Washington
scottm21166
Member Posts: 20,723
Subject:SHOOTER MAGAZINE ON WASH. D.C. FACT
An interesting letter in the Australian Shooter Magazine:
>"If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq Theater of operations during the past 22 months, and a total of 2112 deaths,
>that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.
>
>The firearm death rate in Washington , DC is 80.6 per 100,000 for the same period. That means you are about 25 per cent more likely to be shot and killed in the US capital which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the U..S., than you are in Iraq.
>
>Conclusion: The U.S. Should pull out of Washington .
An interesting letter in the Australian Shooter Magazine:
>"If you consider that there has been an average of 160,000 troops in the Iraq Theater of operations during the past 22 months, and a total of 2112 deaths,
>that gives a firearm death rate of 60 per 100,000 soldiers.
>
>The firearm death rate in Washington , DC is 80.6 per 100,000 for the same period. That means you are about 25 per cent more likely to be shot and killed in the US capital which has some of the strictest gun control laws in the U..S., than you are in Iraq.
>
>Conclusion: The U.S. Should pull out of Washington .
Comments
Charge the ambush, as it were.
Collateral damage be damned!
But if the math IS correct, in the interest of national security, we should ATTACK Washington!
Charge the ambush, as it were.
Collateral damage be damned!
but then someone would find pictures of politicians pissing on or getting pissed on and we would have to retreat and appologize......[xx(]
quote:Originally posted by 9 on the floor
But if the math IS correct, in the interest of national security, we should ATTACK Washington!
Charge the ambush, as it were.
Collateral damage be damned!
but then someone would find pictures of politicians pissing on or getting pissed on and we would have to retreat and appologize......[xx(]
[:D][:D][:D]
quote:Originally posted by hillbille
quote:Originally posted by 9 on the floor
But if the math IS correct, in the interest of national security, we should ATTACK Washington!
Charge the ambush, as it were.
Collateral damage be damned!
but then someone would find pictures of politicians pissing on or getting pissed on and we would have to retreat and appologize......[xx(]
[:D][:D][:D]
I think we should be able to piss on politicians. After all,,, they crap(self censored) on us every chance they get...
Besides, pissing on people is a form of free speech, right?