In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Just when you thought you heard it all.......
Bubba Jr.
Member Posts: 8,303 ✭✭✭✭
Woman says her fake BallPark Frank got her fired
BY DANA DiFILIPPO
Philadelphia Daily News
IS THAT a Fruit-A-Freeze in your pocket - or are you just happy to see me?
A northeastern Pennsylvania woman is suing a South Jersey-based maker of frozen treats and other snack foods, claiming that she was wrongfully fired because she wore a prosthetic BallPark Frank to work.
Pauline Davis, 45, wore the device to the J&J Snack Foods plant in Moosic, Lackawanna County, while she contemplated a gender change, according to a federal civil-rights complaint filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Scranton. She confided in several co-workers about the device, and someone told management, according to the complaint.
She subsequently was fired from her job as a packer/line inspector. Her termination, she claims, was discriminatory because a male co-worker who wore female clothing and prostheses and took hormone treatments was not fired nor disciplined.
Further, argued her Bucks County-based attorney, Lalena J. Turchi, her fake BallPark Frank was concealed and "in no way interfered with her ability to do her job."
Davis filed a complaint in March 2010 with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission office in Philadelphia, claiming gender and gender-identity discrimination.
She is seeking back pay, damages for suffering and humiliation, and punitive damages, according to this week's lawsuit.
The Daily News tried unsuccessfully to reach Davis, of Clifford, a Susquehanna County township north of Scranton, for comment. Her attorneys did not return telephone calls or emails yesterday for comment.
J&J Snack Foods Corp., based in Pennsauken, manufactures, markets and distributes treats including soft pretzels, slushies, frozen pops, cookies and churros. A J&J spokeswoman referred comment to a human-resources supervisor, who did not return our telephone call.
BY DANA DiFILIPPO
Philadelphia Daily News
IS THAT a Fruit-A-Freeze in your pocket - or are you just happy to see me?
A northeastern Pennsylvania woman is suing a South Jersey-based maker of frozen treats and other snack foods, claiming that she was wrongfully fired because she wore a prosthetic BallPark Frank to work.
Pauline Davis, 45, wore the device to the J&J Snack Foods plant in Moosic, Lackawanna County, while she contemplated a gender change, according to a federal civil-rights complaint filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Scranton. She confided in several co-workers about the device, and someone told management, according to the complaint.
She subsequently was fired from her job as a packer/line inspector. Her termination, she claims, was discriminatory because a male co-worker who wore female clothing and prostheses and took hormone treatments was not fired nor disciplined.
Further, argued her Bucks County-based attorney, Lalena J. Turchi, her fake BallPark Frank was concealed and "in no way interfered with her ability to do her job."
Davis filed a complaint in March 2010 with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission office in Philadelphia, claiming gender and gender-identity discrimination.
She is seeking back pay, damages for suffering and humiliation, and punitive damages, according to this week's lawsuit.
The Daily News tried unsuccessfully to reach Davis, of Clifford, a Susquehanna County township north of Scranton, for comment. Her attorneys did not return telephone calls or emails yesterday for comment.
J&J Snack Foods Corp., based in Pennsauken, manufactures, markets and distributes treats including soft pretzels, slushies, frozen pops, cookies and churros. A J&J spokeswoman referred comment to a human-resources supervisor, who did not return our telephone call.
Comments
. . . She confided in several co-workers about the device . .
. . . damages for suffering and humiliation . .
Well, which is it?
Was she confiding (bragging?) or humiliated?
quote:Originally posted by Bubba Jr.
. . . She confided in several co-workers about the device . .
. . . damages for suffering and humiliation . .
Well, which is it?
Was she confiding (bragging?) or humiliated?
Not to agree with said law suet, confiding in a few people you think you can trust not to judge you is different than telling everybody
so she wants to be a he and another employee is a he who wants to be a she. Somethings not right up there.
hmmm,
so she wants to be a he and another employee is a he who wants to be a she. Somethings not right up there.
They should just swap their brains into each others bodies![:p][;)]
Brains?
WHAT brains?
I know this is a stretch but perhaps one of these incidents someday will turn out to be that they were terrible at their job.
Boss: 'I'm going to fire you because there's rumors circulating that you are wearing a strap-on phallic'
Employee: 'Gotta be a better reason to fire someone'
Boss: 'Funny you should bring that up......'