In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

The policy as explained to me.

DocDoc Member Posts: 13,898 ✭✭✭
edited June 2008 in General Discussion
As I understand it, provocative photos of women cannot include displays of nipples; or bare breasts covered by hands or other objects; models going commando (bottomless); camel toes; or models in transparent clothing which pretty much amounts to nudity. Swimsuits are OK, as are photos of models wearing lingerie (is that how you spell it?) or other seductive clothing as long as the basic rules above are not violated. I personally don't care for the thong-covered crotch shots (ala Remote Girl) but nunn has OKed them so my preference doesn't matter.

If I have this wrong, I hope nunn will correct me. Otherwise, I will continue to delete posts that contain photos violating the above guidelines. When too many such posts appear in a thread then the entire thread goes away.

This is not a porno site. I suspect there is no shortage of sites where you can find all the pictures of undressed women you want. Why do you want to put them here?
....................................................................................................
Too old to live...too young to die...
«1

Comments

  • CaptplaidCaptplaid Member Posts: 20,298 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    You're no fun.
  • nunnnunn Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 36,085 ******
    edited November -1
    Posting Guidelines state we delete "nudity." Guidelines do not define "nudity." I may not be able to define it either, but I think I know it when I see it.
  • CaptplaidCaptplaid Member Posts: 20,298 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • JohnnylikesgunsJohnnylikesguns Member Posts: 2,887 ✭✭
    edited November -1
  • buschmasterbuschmaster Member Posts: 14,229 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by SaxonPig
    I suspect there is no shortage of sites where you can find all the pictures of undressed women you want. Why do you want to put them here?because we're not there!
  • Dakota308Dakota308 Member Posts: 4,162
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by buschmaster
    quote:Originally posted by SaxonPig
    I suspect there is no shortage of sites where you can find all the pictures of undressed women you want. Why do you want to put them here?because we're not there!


    not good at multi[:D]tasking
  • He DogHe Dog Member Posts: 51,593 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by buschmaster
    quote:Originally posted by SaxonPig
    I suspect there is no shortage of sites where you can find all the pictures of undressed women you want. Why do you want to put them here?because we're not there!



    You are welcome to go![}:)]
  • zipperzapzipperzap Member Posts: 25,057
    edited November -1
    It's a reflection of the trashy neighborhood?
  • bobskibobski Member Posts: 17,866 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    ask yourself these questions before you post it:

    would i be ashamed for your 10 year old children to view it.

    can i click and paste it to your boss, friends, and family without shame.

    am i afraid if a liberal got a hold of it and you saw it on abc news one of these nights showing what gun websites are doing these days to promote family safety and the right to bare arms....by selling it with porn.

    what would i do if one day i got a notice on this website as a result of my incurable desire to lust after flesh, ALL OF US PAY THE PRICE for it.

    folks, i've seen 3 websites go off the air because of a handful of freaks, i DONT want it to happen at this website. its the best around. i vote to keep the trash out and give it no quarter, along with those that post it.

    below is an example of what REALLY HAPPENS...
    "Valued Members,

    Until further notice, the Member to Member Message Boards will be unavailable.

    Unfortunately, these forums are a significant burden on the website operations. We receive almost as many daily Customer Service requests related to `issues` on the boards as we do for auction related activity. On a daily basis, we have members asking us to inactivate their account because of something they saw on the boards or some `argument` they are in. We simply can not continue to allow this.

    We truly do believe in the development of a cohesive community. A community where members can come to relax and have fun - maybe even learn something or solve a problem. As it stands, the boards cause more problems than they solve.

    Therefore we have closed them indefinitely.

    Thanks for continuing to grow with us.

    Support"
    Retired Naval Aviation
    Former Member U.S. Navy Shooting Team
    Former NSSA All American
    Navy Distinguished Pistol Shot
    MO, CT, VA.
  • buschmasterbuschmaster Member Posts: 14,229 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    what's there to be ashamed of? it's not for some people to look at, we aren't them and we like it.
  • mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If it gives you wood Poof it good!

    HEHE
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • TooBigTooBig Member Posts: 28,559 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Give it a rest Bobski the Mods are doing a good job montoring it, if it offends you so much go over to the Disney Channel OPPS you might see offensive stuff there also.Get off your soap box and let Nunn, SP and the others decide to poof it or not. My last one had NSFW OR KIDS AND YOU OPENED IT ANYWAY. DUH and the Sunday adds have more skin showing than the video.
  • bobskibobski Member Posts: 17,866 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    this is an open forum. im voicing my opinion and i wont go away until porn goes away. i give no 1/4 to those who bully their flesh wares on open forums.
    why not give porn a rest?
    what really gets me about you so called pro gun folks is you swear to defend your rights, promise to kill child molesters if you could, yet allow your very own fellow family members children to feed and view this crap on this website and you bless it in the name or 'your rights.'
    what you porn freaks should have is a porn forum that demands passwords and such for the freaks to access.
    this way you have to make a deliberate attempt to see it. the issue is that your smut is ACCESSIBLE by ANYONE. and not EVERYONE knows what nsfw means. people come to gb to learn guns, not how to be roped into lusting for 1/2 naked women.
    would you like me to list some CHILDREN who have seen this stuff already? would you like me to have their parents talk to you about it?
    wasa time when at the grocery store you had to lift a smut book out of a shelf to see the cover. that way, innocent underaged children wouldnt be exposed to it. porn shops still have boards over windows to hide their shame. yet here...on gb...no thought is given to what harm is being done to the WORLD when they come here to read about guns and get bombarded with smut, free for the clicking. you hang it out there like bait on a hook hoping to catch someone. AND YOU DO. its a shameful practice that makes be embarrassed to be part of the gun world and gunbroker at times.
    and if youre not concerned, you lack morals and care for others, making you careLESS, disRESPECTFUL, and irRESPONSIBLE. 3 BIG things that dont go good with GUNS.[:(!]
    i said my peace.

    i will continue to help monitor your carelessness and to report infractions. i will give no ground.
    Retired Naval Aviation
    Former Member U.S. Navy Shooting Team
    Former NSSA All American
    Navy Distinguished Pistol Shot
    MO, CT, VA.
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by nunn
    Posting Guidelines state we delete "nudity." Guidelines do not define "nudity." I may not be able to define it either, but I think I know it when I see it.


    Sounds like a pretty simple and basic policy to me...not very hard to interpret either...sort of like the 2nd Amendment.
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,525 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ECC
    quote:Originally posted by nunn
    Posting Guidelines state we delete "nudity." Guidelines do not define "nudity." I may not be able to define it either, but I think I know it when I see it.


    Sounds like a pretty simple and basic policy to me...not very hard to interpret either...sort of like the 2nd Amendment.


    Only for some
  • A J ChristA J Christ Member Posts: 7,534
    edited November -1
    quote: I may not be able to define it either, but I think I know it when I see it.


    I would hope so.
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    And the self-appointed, self-righteous holy anti-porn warriors go forth and attempt to impose their will upon the wicked among the GB flock.

    Shameful pornographers, one and all, the lot of you. Peddling moral decay and disgusting filth.

    THINK OF THE CHILDREN for Gods sake!

    ****Disclaimer on the above**** It was heavy on sarcasm, for those who may not get it.

    All this, over the female form, scantily clad and provocatively posed though they may be.[;)]

    Another classic illustration of Collectivist thought -vs- Individualist thought.
  • He DogHe Dog Member Posts: 51,593 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Another classic illustration of Collectivist thought -vs- Individualist thought.


    Exactly! There can't be more than 100,000 websites dedicated to you deep thinking individualists.
  • DocDoc Member Posts: 13,898 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Yada yada yada.

    YAAAAAWN!!!

    ZZZZZZZZZZZ...
    ....................................................................................................
    Too old to live...too young to die...
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by He Dog
    quote:Another classic illustration of Collectivist thought -vs- Individualist thought.


    Exactly! There can't be more than 100,000 websites dedicated to you deep thinking individualists.


    That has exactly.....well, nothing to do with the quoted point.

    Go figure.
  • Colt SuperColt Super Member Posts: 31,007
    edited November -1
    I likes nekkid wimmen pichurs.

    Gunz two.

    Dug
  • He DogHe Dog Member Posts: 51,593 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Straight to the heart of the matter actually.
  • 1911a1-fan1911a1-fan Member Posts: 51,193 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:provocative photos of women cannot include displays of nipples


    you do realize that is a side effect of breast in general they go hand in hand, and cannot be helped?

    i can understand see thru, but just the outline i can't
  • Allison9Allison9 Member Posts: 388 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Maybe I'm just not on here enough, but I have NEVER seen porn on here. There have been two topics in the last couple of weeks that had females in bikini's, but that is NOT PORN.

    That being said, real nudes or porn DO NOT belong here on GBF. I have a porn,nude site- so if you want to see naked females beleave me you can find them. But while this forum was created to discuss guns and related topics, the gen discussion and politics area are a free for all.
    And if Nunn thinks moding here is hard, go to my sits I mod and figure out the age of some of these girls. You got it easy.
  • Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Not into porn myself, but I certainly don't mind seeing pics of hot females.
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by select-fire
    quote:Originally posted by ECC
    quote:Originally posted by nunn
    Posting Guidelines state we delete "nudity." Guidelines do not define "nudity." I may not be able to define it either, but I think I know it when I see it.


    Sounds like a pretty simple and basic policy to me...not very hard to interpret either...sort of like the 2nd Amendment.


    Only for some



    Maybe I should take that 2nd Amendment part out of there...but you've got to appreciate how David keeps it simple. No need to get over complicated on these issues...
  • CaptplaidCaptplaid Member Posts: 20,298 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Can we blame Albert Lum?
  • He DogHe Dog Member Posts: 51,593 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    For anything and everything.
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    SaxonPig wrote:


    quote:This is not a porno site. I suspect there is no shortage of sites where you can find all the pictures of undressed women you want. Why do you want to put them here?

    So far in about 3 years, no one can answer it, nor will they...It has been asked that just links be posted and not the pics, but I think its because the guys dont want the wives to see them going to porn sites, or bosses or co-workers, so they post the pics here...

    As for the posters of the pics?...well there are 2 theories....
  • davealddaveald Member Posts: 2,078 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm not one to visit porn sites, nor do I visit religous sites, and I dont think theres enough of either on this site to bother me.
    I respect the fact that people put the nfw in the heading it gives me the oppotunity to open or not.
    Occasionlly I enjoy reading the religous views of others even though I don't necessarily agree with them, but it gives me a hint into there thought process, and I would rather see a naked girl with a gun vs. a naked guy with a gun anytime.
  • FrancFFrancF Member Posts: 35,279 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Let's just say if you can see it on "Public/Regular/Standard/Non PPV TV in the USA" this does not include content carried on British TV/Showtime/HBO/Cinamax/maxim etc-
  • buschmasterbuschmaster Member Posts: 14,229 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    this is an open forum. im voicing my opinion and i wont go away until porn goes away. i give no 1/4 to those who bully their flesh wares on open forums. why not give porn a rest?
    what really gets me about you so called pro gun folks is you swear to defend your rights, promise to kill child molesters if you could, yet allow your very own fellow family members children to feed and view this crap on this website and you bless it in the name or 'your rights.'
    what you porn freaks should have is a porn forum that demands passwords and such for the freaks to access.
    this way you have to make a deliberate attempt to see it. the issue is that your smut is ACCESSIBLE by ANYONE. and not EVERYONE knows what nsfw means. people come to gb to learn guns, not how to be roped into lusting for 1/2 naked women.
    would you like me to list some CHILDREN who have seen this stuff already? would you like me to have their parents talk to you about it?
    wasa time when at the grocery store you had to lift a smut book out of a shelf to see the cover. that way, innocent underaged children wouldnt be exposed to it. porn shops still have boards over windows to hide their shame. yet here...on gb...no thought is given to what harm is being done to the WORLD when they come here to read about guns and get bombarded with smut, free for the clicking. you hang it out there like bait on a hook hoping to catch someone. AND YOU DO. its a shameful practice that makes be embarrassed to be part of the gun world and gunbroker at times.
    and if youre not concerned, you lack morals and care for others, making you careLESS, disRESPECTFUL, and irRESPONSIBLE. 3 BIG things that dont go good with GUNS.[:(!]
    i said my peace.

    i will continue to help monitor your carelessness and to report infractions. i will give no ground.

    everything you would say about pornsters are "trying to do to people" pretty much describes you religiosos, doesn't it. no, religion and porn aren't the same thing, but these supposed tactics you accuse them of and the disrespect are.

    so I do the same thing with you and the religious indoctrination being peddled, but when I do it I'm supposedly a bad guy.

    well, I suppose I can say... "back at ha homey"
  • PlotzkyPlotzky Member Posts: 281 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Maybe I should take that 2nd Amendment part out of there...but you've got to appreciate how David keeps it simple. No need to get over complicated on these issues...


    Son, I'm still a'waitin y'alls 1'st original thought...[xx(]
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,525 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Leave me see.. some don't watch TV.. humm.. maybe they are allergic to pictures.Pictures now on the internet TV in front of them. Pictures they have a choice to look at or not. I will acknowledge their 1st amendment right of freedom of speech for voicing their opinion. However when they combine the viewing of pictures to the application of moral gun values they are not the same. Not even close. Their high horse attitude shows exactly what type of person they are... pay attention.. This is a GENERAL FORUM. I have read the rules and guidelines and think most on here know what they are. Some go overboard and get poofed. Some complain and get poofed. Once again it is a general forum.. PS.. that means we discuss various topics...

    GW.. I feel better.
  • HAIRYHAIRY Member Posts: 23,606
    edited November -1
    quote:would i be ashamed for your 10 year old children to view it. Reminds me of the one where a woman was driving her 5-year old and alongside them comes a convertible with the top down and a woman completely nude!

    The boy says, "Momma, look at that woman, shame on her."

    The woman, proud to see her little one is so modest, says, "Yes, dear, I do."

    Boy continues, "She doesn't have her seat belt on." [;)]
  • dcon12dcon12 Member Posts: 32,040 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by SaxonPig
    As I understand it, provocative photos of women cannot include displays of nipples; or bare breasts covered by hands or other objects; models going commando (bottomless); camel toes; or models in transparent clothing which pretty much amounts to nudity. Swimsuits are OK, as are photos of models wearing lingerie (is that how you spell it?) or other seductive clothing as long as the basic rules above are not violated. I personally don't care for the thong-covered crotch shots (ala Remote Girl) but nunn has OKed them so my preference doesn't matter.

    If I have this wrong, I hope nunn will correct me. Otherwise, I will continue to delete posts that contain photos violating the above guidelines. When too many such posts appear in a thread then the entire thread goes away.

    This is not a porno site. I suspect there is no shortage of sites where you can find all the pictures of undressed women you want. Why do you want to put them here?



    You try to complicate things too much. Years ago a fellow asked me how to fry chicken, I told him that the first thing you had to do was get you a chicken. Don
  • CaptplaidCaptplaid Member Posts: 20,298 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • 1911a1-fan1911a1-fan Member Posts: 51,193 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Captplaid
    I'm confused.



    i am now too, the best i can figure is that saxon is dating a black man, all of a sudden every post is racist, and now he is against women[:D]
  • 41 nut41 nut Member Posts: 3,016
    edited November -1
    Are this nudity or do the grips cover enough to keep me out of trouble?? [}:)][}:)]

    211352584.jpg
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by 41 nut
    Are this nudity or do the grips cover enough to keep me out of trouble?? [}:)][}:)]

    211352584.jpg



    ...'careful there 41 nut...you are pushing it...[;)]
Sign In or Register to comment.