In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Liberal Justices Hand Donald Trump 5-2 Majority
kissgoodnight
Member Posts: 4,063 ✭✭✭
c/p
Justice Kennedy will no longer be the deciding vote on the Supreme Court. ?The best he can do is change a 5-2 majority to a 4-3 majority and we have two liberal justices to thank. ?Both Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor have given the new president a gift that will keep on giving, unless John Roberts steps in and makes a really bad decision.again.
I have researched it and found that there is no prohibition on Supreme Court members from exercising their first Amendment Rights even when it comes to politics. ?They cannot be removed from the court as long as they don't say something that is prohibited by law. such as a death threat or a terroristic threat. ?But, and this is a big but, they are obligated to recuse themselves in any case in which they have shown bias. ?That is why justices avoid talking about any subject which has not already been adjudicated by SCOTUS>
Both Sotomayor and Ginsburg have made highly prejudicial statements about Donald Trump. ?The genie is now out of the bottle. ?It can't be put back. ?Can Ginsberg say, "Yes, I think Trump is a racist, a baboon and a scumbag, but I can be fair to him." ?Would you have faith in that? ?I wouldn't.
Justice Kennedy will no longer be the deciding vote on the Supreme Court. ?The best he can do is change a 5-2 majority to a 4-3 majority and we have two liberal justices to thank. ?Both Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor have given the new president a gift that will keep on giving, unless John Roberts steps in and makes a really bad decision.again.
I have researched it and found that there is no prohibition on Supreme Court members from exercising their first Amendment Rights even when it comes to politics. ?They cannot be removed from the court as long as they don't say something that is prohibited by law. such as a death threat or a terroristic threat. ?But, and this is a big but, they are obligated to recuse themselves in any case in which they have shown bias. ?That is why justices avoid talking about any subject which has not already been adjudicated by SCOTUS>
Both Sotomayor and Ginsburg have made highly prejudicial statements about Donald Trump. ?The genie is now out of the bottle. ?It can't be put back. ?Can Ginsberg say, "Yes, I think Trump is a racist, a baboon and a scumbag, but I can be fair to him." ?Would you have faith in that? ?I wouldn't.
Comments
Too old to live...too young to die...
I think Sotomayor was involved with Obamacare early on as lawyer in some case and refused to recuse herself when it hit the big court. Don't count on any of the liberal justices ever doing the right thing.
Got that right.