In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Thought police? H.R. 2159

pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,844 ✭✭✭✭
edited May 2009 in General Discussion
Remember the "expanded" definition of potential "domestic terrorists" that came out last month?

If you supported a third-party candidate (or republican Ron Paul) possess subversive literature, are anti-abortion, believe in the possibility of the North American Union, own a "Don't Tread on Me" flag or the anti-income tax film "America: Freedom to Fascism." or protest taxes? YOU could be a domestic terrorist.

Click here for FOX news article


Now add H. R. 2159 into the fray.
(Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009)

Click here for Worldnetdaily article

Part of this bill.....

`The Attorney General may determine that an applicant for a firearm permit which would qualify for an exemption under section 922(t) is known (or appropriately suspected) to be or have been engaged in conduct constituting, in preparation for, in aid of, or related to terrorism, or providing material support thereof, and the Attorney General has a reasonable belief that the applicant may use a firearm in connection with terrorism.'; and

(3) in section 921(a), by adding at the end the following:

`(36) The term `terrorism' means `international terrorism' as defined in section 2331(1), and `domestic terrorism' as defined in section 2331(5).

Definition of domestic terrorist....from section 2331(5).

(5) the term "domestic terrorism" means activities that -
(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;
(B) appear to be intended -
(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;
(ii) to influence the policy of a government by
intimidation or coercion; or
(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass
destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and
(C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of
the United States.

This bill does have 6 cosponsors........so far.

Oh wait, nevermind. Our government wouldn't dare.

Comments

  • Colt SuperColt Super Member Posts: 31,007
    edited November -1
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    I fear they are going to force the hands of Patriots...a day is coming....[V]
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    It seems as if nothing will wake up America to the relentless, deliberate march toward totalitarianism by our government.

    The stage for totalitarianism is being set, in the open, certainly against The Constitution and seemingly with no fear, or attempt to disguise it to any great degree.

    Collectivism leads to totalitarianism, inevitably.

    Nothing will stop it now. Elections won't do schit to correct it, on a national level.

    It will take some "tipping point", or some over-reaching move by the Fed, before any real corrective measures are taken by "we the people". By that time, it may well be far too late for an awakened, yet disorganized, citizenry to effectively use "liberty's teeth" to set things right.

    Wake up people....
  • moonshinemoonshine Member Posts: 8,471
    edited November -1
    what I think is that "they" are going to try to take us one at a time. If "swat" shows up at your door what are you going to do? Who is going to help you.we are not organized.
Sign In or Register to comment.