In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

a glimpse of WWII earlier this week

TxsTxs Member Posts: 17,809 ✭✭✭
edited March 2013 in General Discussion
Heard a strange sound overhead, then looked up and saw a very unexpected sight - a B24, a P51 and an ME262 cruising by at fairly low altitude. Wow! [:0]

I checked around a bit and learned these were Collings Foundation aircraft working the airshow circuit and enroute to their next show.

I'd never laid eyes on a B24 in the air before, but that odd, long skinny wing is hard to mistake.

Turns out that ME262 is a recently manufactured replica, using basically the same engines as the US T38 Talon and F5.

Comments

  • chris8X57chris8X57 Member Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    What a sight to see for sure.
    That B-24 has flown in and out of Logan Airport in Billings several times. The B-17 got all the glamour, but the B-24 was the workhorse of WW2.

    ~Chris
  • 11BravoCrunchie11BravoCrunchie Member Posts: 33,423 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by chris8X57
    What a sight to see for sure.
    That B-24 has flown in and out of Logan Airport in Billings several times. The B-17 got all the glamour, but the B-24 was the workhorse of WW2.

    ~Chris



    That's probably because the B-17 didn't shed its wings at random while in flight.
  • catgunguycatgunguy Member Posts: 6,089
    edited November -1
    I have had the oppourtunity to see B-17's but never saw a B-24. I think the B-24s are more rare.
  • M1A762M1A762 Member Posts: 3,426
    edited November -1
    Was the ME262 complete with insignia? I would have liked to see that![:)]
  • Sam06Sam06 Member Posts: 21,244 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:That's probably because the B-17 didn't shed its wings at random while in flight.


    Actually it's because the B24 could carry more bombs, farther, faster and they built 1/3 more of them than the B17. It was not considered as sturdy as the B-17.

    The B24 had 3 less guns but 1 more crewman. The controls were very heavy and it was a difficult aircraft to fly.

    The B-24 was the most produced Military aircraft.


    My Uncle flew both in WW2 and he liked the B-17 better but he said the B-24 was a better bomber.
    RLTW

  • TxsTxs Member Posts: 17,809 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by M1A762
    Was the ME262 complete with insignia? I would have liked to see that![:)]
    Here's a pic of it from their website.

    262ml-07-1200.jpg

    Notice it's the B-1, two seat variant. They plan to start offering flights, but if that sounds like something you'd like to do I'd recommend you start saving up now. [:D]
  • machine gun moranmachine gun moran Member Posts: 5,198
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Zulu7
    quote:Originally posted by chris8X57
    What a sight to see for sure.
    That B-24 has flown in and out of Logan Airport in Billings several times. The B-17 got all the glamour, but the B-24 was the workhorse of WW2.

    ~Chris



    That's probably because the B-17 didn't shed its wings at random while in flight.


    I had never heard of B24's doing that. ([?])
  • chris8X57chris8X57 Member Posts: 1,268 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by machine gun moran
    quote:Originally posted by Zulu7
    quote:Originally posted by chris8X57
    What a sight to see for sure.
    That B-24 has flown in and out of Logan Airport in Billings several times. The B-17 got all the glamour, but the B-24 was the workhorse of WW2.

    ~Chris



    That's probably because the B-17 didn't shed its wings at random while in flight.


    I had never heard of B24's doing that. ([?])


    I never read that either. The B-24 was, however, more prone to breaking apart after sustaining heavy flak damage than the B-17. It was also more dangerous to belly land on account of it's high wing. ( a compelling story of a belly land in a B-24 is one of the aircraft 'Maxwell House, Good To The Last Drop', that was belly landed in Italy after sustaining flak damage over Austria )

    After Charles Lindbergh flew the B-24 on a test flight out of the Willow Run plant, he was quoted as saying "I am not overly impressed with the qualities of this bomber." He did, however, work diligently to improve it's faults and turn it into an excellent long range bomber. The B-24 went on to have the highest production rate of any bomber in the US inventory.

    I do not think that it may have been the best choice for the low level attack on the Ploesti oil fields in Romania. That attack has been analyzed for decades by historians, and while generally a success, it was at a very high cost of aircraft and crews.

    ~Chris
  • 1BigGuy1BigGuy Member Posts: 4,033 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Some B-17s sustained an incredible amount of damage and remained in the air. Probably the most famous "Made it back" picture is this one of a B-17 from the 97th Bomb Group called the "All American". It suffered a collision with a German fighter and still made the 90 minute flight back home.

    B-17f-41-24406-97bg-poleb.jpg
    Once everyone was safely out, the plane broke in two:
    b17allamerican.jpg

    This B-24 didn't fare quite as well:
    b24-5.jpg
    [V]
    I got the opportunity to take a 30 minute flight in a B-17G last summer. I'll never forget it. It was worth every penny.
    599837_3217883202596_1774480787_n.jpg
    The view from the left waist gun:
    208875_3217893442852_201900706_n.jpg
  • Old-ColtsOld-Colts Member Posts: 22,697 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Yep, they were here!

    If you can't feel the music; it's only pink noise!

Sign In or Register to comment.