In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

CA Senate Bill 374- Heads Up CA Members

medic07medic07 Member Posts: 5,222 ✭✭✭
edited July 2013 in General Discussion
This bill has passed the Senate but not the Assembly.

http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB374

This bill would, instead, classify a semiautomatic, rimfire or centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept no more than 10 rounds or fewer as an assault weapon.

The Ruger 10/22, Marlin 795 and others will become ASSAULT WEAPONS effective next year if this passes and is signed into law.

Just how bad is CA going to get?

Comments

  • FrancFFrancF Member Posts: 35,279 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    They been trying to get background checks for ammo as well and ban internet ammo purchases.
  • EVILDR235EVILDR235 Member Posts: 4,398 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Your papers please.




    XXXXXX
  • kissgoodnightkissgoodnight Member Posts: 4,063 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

    SB 374, as amended, Steinberg. Firearms: assault weapons.

    Existing law regulates the sale, carrying, and control of firearms, including assault weapons, and requires assault weapons to be registered with the Department of Justice. Violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law defines a semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and other specified features and a semiautomatic weapon that has a fixed magazine with a capacity to accept 10 or more rounds as an assault weapon.

    This bill would, instead, classify a semiautomatic, rimfire or centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept no more than 10 rounds or fewer as an assault weapon. The bill would require a person who, between January 1, 2001, and prior to January 1, 2014, lawfully possessed an assault weapon that does not have a fixed magazine, including those weapons with an ammunition feeding device that can be removed readily from the firearm with the use of a tool, to register the firearm by July 1, 2014. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.

    This bill would require, on and after July 1, 2014, a Firearm Ownership Record to be submitted, as specified, to the Department of Justice for every firearm an individual owns, with prescribed exceptions, including firearms purchased from a licensed firearms dealer and documented by a Dealers' Record of Sale transaction and assault weapons registered with the department. The bill would authorize the department to charge a fee of up to $19 per transaction for the submission of the Firearm Ownership Record.

    The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.

    This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.

    ......and it goes on
  • 4627046270 Member Posts: 12,627
    edited November -1
    The problem being the fools in CA elected these fools to represent them, we have some real problem in this country, that being said.
    When we elect people, they turn the tables on us the people.
    By the people, for the people.
    We the people need to shake up Washington, these fools are padding their pockets, while we the people, now have to buy I to obamacare, spend nearly 4 bucks a gallon,

    I don't care what party you are, but they are giving our country away, and putting more laws and regs on the books. WE THE PEOPLE! NEED TO TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY!
  • Waco WaltzWaco Waltz Member Posts: 10,836 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by medic07
    This bill has passed the Senate but not the Assembly.

    http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB374

    This bill would, instead, classify a semiautomatic, rimfire or centerfire rifle that does not have a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept no more than 10 rounds or fewer as an assault weapon.

    The Ruger 10/22, Marlin 795 and others will become ASSAULT WEAPONS effective next year if this passes and is signed into law.

    Just how bad is CA going to get?


    The biggest mistake was letting the Government classify any civilian weapons as Assault weapons in the first place.
  • ruger41ruger41 Member Posts: 14,665 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    CA is a lost cause. You will NEVER regain lost gun rights there. CA is 100% controlled by antigun Democrats. The liberal strongholds of the Bay Area & LA make it impossible to vote them out due to population. The problem is we can no longer say "Oh who cares..it's CA and it won't affect me." Many States want to copy everything CA does. I left in '07...two weeks ago my company made me an offer to go back to CA and run a branch, with a raise that would have added $10K a year to my salary. I flatly turned it down. There is no amount of money that would get me to move back to that craphole state.
Sign In or Register to comment.