In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Texas Law: True or False

xericoxerico Member Posts: 125 ✭✭
edited December 2008 in General Discussion
Hi.

I was the witness to an assault tonight while shopping for Xmas presents.

Two young punks were slapping around a teenage pregnant woman in the parking lot of a strip mall. The moment I realized what was happening, I handed my wife the bags I was carrying and started running towards the scene. By the time I ran across the parking lot to intervene, the punks fled across the crowded parking lot to their car and left.

As soon as I got to the young lady, other "witnesses" started arriving on the scene. One gave the young woman a bottle of water and my wife had called the police.

It turns out that Punk #1 is the boyfriend of the assaulted young woman. Punk #2 is a friend of Punk #1.

By the time the police arrived on the scene, the woman was rightfully pissed off.

I gave the police my number and told them I was a witness to the assault and I would gladly offer my testimony. Other witnesses offered the same.

Then the police officer hit me with a verbal ton of bricks. He said, "It probably won't come to that. Since we didn't see the assault, we cannot arrest the two men." He later went on to explain that a detective would "review" the case. If the detective determined that the young lady's case was a good one, he would ALLOW the young lady to press charges. The young lady was agitated and claimed she wanted to press charges right there. The policeman explained that they could go the police station and file a report, but that there was no guarantee that charges would be pressed. He recommended that she wait a while before coming to such a "hasty" decision.

I was shocked!

Even with multiple eye witnesses the officer was pretty adamant that charges of assault against the two were slim since police didn't witness the event.

I know the D.A. can determine if a case is strong enough to convict, but I didn't know that a police officer's approval was required to even move forward with pressing charges.

So is it true that a Detective or Police Officer determines if charges are pressed?

Can a police officer prevent a citizen from pressing charges?

Comments

  • Options
    dcon12dcon12 Member Posts: 31,947 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by xerico
    Can a police officer prevent a citizen from pressing charges?



    No. Don
  • Options
    agloreaglore Member Posts: 6,012
    edited November -1
    So how do police officers in Texas arrest bank robbers, murderers and so on if they didn't witness the crime?
  • Options
    trapguy2007trapguy2007 Member Posts: 8,959
    edited November -1
    Sounds like a case of too much paperwork for the "officers".
  • Options
    Spider7115Spider7115 Member, Moderator Posts: 29,714 ******
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by aglore
    So how do police officers in Texas arrest bank robbers, murderers and so on if they didn't witness the crime?


    Those would be felonies. Some states or cities require the officer to witness a misdemeanor in order to make an arrest.
  • Options
    chaosrobchaosrob Member Posts: 1,871 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Spider7115
    quote:Originally posted by aglore
    So how do police officers in Texas arrest bank robbers, murderers and so on if they didn't witness the crime?


    Those would be felonies. Some states or cities require the officer to witness a misdemeanor in order to make an arrest.
    well gee that is justice, although we all know how reliable most eye-witness accounts are
  • Options
    jeffb1911jeffb1911 Member Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    As a Texas Peace Officer, i must WITNESS a crime in order to make an on sight arrest for Misdomenors. IF she was not seriously injured, then it would be class c assault, but since it was her boyrfriend, that makes it Assault/Family Violence. When the suspect is still onscene, there MUST be a way to separate the parties so no further violence could occurr, IE: Take the suspect to jail and let him talk to the judge! Since the scum left tghe scene, there was not much chance of further violence happening. At my agency, i would get a hand written statement from the victim, and in her statement i need her stating whether or not she wished to press charges. Unfortunately a great majority of those cases wind up getting dropped later when the victim rembers she is "in love" with the piece of human debris. Besides, do you know how many other times this has happened with this couple? i know of several in my small town that occurr on a regular basis, and the victim always takes the suspect back. i've pressed the charges for the state several times over the objections of the victim in things like this. But when all i have is statements from witnesses, and a victim who is known to change her story, it is better to get a warrant.
  • Options
    TxsTxs Member Posts: 18,801
    edited November -1
    Part of what he was saying was that due to this being a misdemeanor offense which wasn't witnessed by a peace officer, a warrantless arrest could not be made. Due to this being a 'Family Violence' situation a warrantless arrest could have been made if the boyfriend had still been in the immediate area or returned, but officers can't go hunting him down and make an arrest on this without a warrant.

    The cop could've filed a report (or did) for follow-up investigation. Through this process investigators would either develop or determine if sufficient evidence exists to prove the case. By this I mean there are multiple essential elements for each criminal law violation and each of these must be 'proven beyond a reasonable doubt'. If all of these elements either can't be met or don't exist no action is taken. If they are, the case is filed with the District/County Attorney's office and an arrest warrant is issued. Depending upon the nature of the offense this can happen either quickly or slowly.
  • Options
    45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm in Ca. While it would not be a high priority, we would be looking for scumbag 1&2 for domestic violence. A temp, protective order would be issued. The victim's statement taken and medical aid renedered. In Ca. If at all possible, he's going to get hooked. And if scumbag 2 had ANY involvment, his going as an accessary.
  • Options
    Tech141Tech141 Member Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Tic-Toc, Tic-Toc, Tic-Toc, Tic-Toc,Tic-Toc, Tic-Toc.. 2 days later the scum-Bag boy-friend starts hitting her with what-ever he has in his reach, like a pipe, a 2X4, or a brick. 3 days later we'll be subjected to the newspaper headline about some creep who kiled his girl-friend when he 'accidently' hit her on the head '17' times with a pipe he just happened to be carrying at the time. The cops were not taking questions.

    I'm teaching my daughter that the first time ANY punk-* M-F**ker raises his hand at her, she takes the POS out. She is 12-years-old and a Red Belt in Tae Kwon Do.
  • Options
    TxsTxs Member Posts: 18,801
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by 45long
    I'm in Ca. While it would not be a high priority, we would be looking for scumbag 1&2 for domestic violence.So are you saying no warrant would be required to arrest either of them?

    FYI - Under the circumstances given a protective order could also be issued in Texas. But we're discussing criminal charges here, not court orders.
  • Options
    VforVendettaVforVendetta Member Posts: 36 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Cops, janitors of human strife and misery.

    Not much good for anything else. Certainly not "proactive" in any real sense of the word.

    However, if the planet was ever invaded by sugary sweet ring-shaped aliens, I'd rightfully want 'em on my side.
  • Options
    TxsTxs Member Posts: 18,801
    edited November -1
    ...said the kid who took on the name of a comic book character. [:D]
  • Options
    45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Tx,, Thats right. Even if we show up at the house and nobody wants to file charges, if there is physical evidence that a DV has occured, even if it's a hole in the wall, somebody is going to jail. The victim doesn't have to file charges.

    For example. If the responsible is at the hospital getting treated for a wound suffered in a DV. He gives us a statement that the wife,(vic), did it. But it's ok. She didn't mean it. Off her meds. Whatever. We send a unit to the house to check the story. Find out that the victim was protecting herself. Phone torn out, you know the scene. The responsible is arrested on the spot at the hospital and a protective order is issued. Same thing if the resposible leaves and goes to a friends house after he beat up the wife. We go to the friends house and after a breif investigative interview, he will most likely get hooked.
  • Options
    45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    tx,, AS for scumbag 2. That would depend on his involvment. If he just stood around and watched and didn't really do anything, then he would probably get cut loose. If the Vic states that he held her as the boyfreind smacked her around, and statements to the effect were gathered from wittness', then yeah he's going too.
  • Options
    AlpineAlpine Member Posts: 15,051 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    All this could be solved if there was citizens arrest in Texas. You just take one witness from the scene over to where the crook is, do a curd-side lineup, citizen IDs crook, citizen says the magic words from the safety of inside the patrol car. Crook is hooked up and off to jail.

    Problem solved.
    ?The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.?
    Margaret Thatcher

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
    Mark Twain
  • Options
    bhale187bhale187 Member Posts: 7,798
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Txs
    quote:Originally posted by 45long
    I'm in Ca. While it would not be a high priority, we would be looking for scumbag 1&2 for domestic violence.So are you saying no warrant would be required to arrest either of them?

    FYI - Under the circumstances given a protective order could also be issued in Texas. But we're discussing criminal charges here, not court orders.

    Here in Illinois there is no requirement an officer witness a misdemeanor or have a warrant to make the arrest, just probable cause.

    In fact, it's almost the opposite in Cook County (Chicago). There an officer can not make ANY felony arrest without the approval of the State's Attorney. You have to call in to the SA on call and expalin the circumstances then request felony approval. Much more often than not it is denied and the officer has to come up with a misdemeanor charge to take a felon to jail. Tha's not state law, just Cook county's BS rule.
  • Options
    ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by VforVendetta
    Cops, janitors of human strife and misery.

    Not much good for anything else. Certainly not "proactive" in any real sense of the word.

    However, if the planet was ever invaded by sugary sweet ring-shaped aliens, I'd rightfully want 'em on my side.
    I'd say janitor is a good word for law enforcement officers - they do honest work for not much pay cleaning up the bull$#!t losers and lazy whiners throw in their laps.

    BTW, for someone who calls themself "VforVendetta", why in the world would you want more "proactive" cops? Did you miss the whole anti-authoritarian theme of that overrated series or are you really that infatuated with the thought of grown men wandering around in masks?
  • Options
    AlpineAlpine Member Posts: 15,051 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ElMuertoMonkey
    quote:Originally posted by VforVendetta
    Cops, janitors of human strife and misery.

    Not much good for anything else. Certainly not "proactive" in any real sense of the word.

    However, if the planet was ever invaded by sugary sweet ring-shaped aliens, I'd rightfully want 'em on my side.
    I'd say janitor is a good word for law enforcement officers - they do honest work for not much pay cleaning up the bull$#!t losers and lazy whiners throw in their laps.

    BTW, for someone who calls themself "VforVendetta", why in the world would you want more "proactive" cops? Did you miss the whole anti-authoritarian theme of that overrated series or are you really that infatuated with the thought of grown men wandering around in masks?


    Why Dead Monkey, a kind-of-nice comment on law enforcement? What's up with that?
    ?The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.?
    Margaret Thatcher

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
    Mark Twain
  • Options
    ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    Alpine,

    I wasn't aware I was known for any sort of anti-law enforcement attitude. Most of the cops I've met have been cool folks... and yes, that includes the ones who have pulled me over.[;)]

    And personally I think it was an entirely nice comment - I have nothing against janitors either. Law enforcement officers certainly put more on the line, but I never begrudge anyone their honest work regardless of how humble their job position may be.
  • Options
    n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    The police dont have to be at the scene to determine if there is cause to arrest. Do the police see bank robbers rob the bank?? Arrests are made everyday in murder cases where the police have been no where near at the time of the crime. I think the cops in this tale didnt want to go through the paperwork and hassle..[:(]

    Hey! Cop! you didnt see me do it so you cant arrest me....LMAO
  • Options
    NeilTheBritNeilTheBrit Member Posts: 390 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Seems strange.
    I'm a cop here in New Mexico so maybe it's a bit different than Texas. Here we need a warrant to arrest for a misdemeanor unless: 1. We see it happen. 2. Shoplifting. 3. Battery against a household member. There's a few others but in this case I would arrest punk #1 for battery and punk #2 for accessory. I'm not interested if the girl doesn't want to press charges it's a State policy to arrest. And as for not taking a report and deciding not to pursue the case, you must be joking. I'm a cop, it's not up to me to decide which cases are worth pursuing, that's the DA's job. We actually had a cop fired recently because he didn't apply for an arrest warrant. Seemed that boyfriend and girlfriend came to blows, the officer was sent round to stop them fighting, which he did, and then ignored policy and decided not to arrest the boyfriend even though the girlfriend had cuts and bruises on her face. Couple of days later girlfriend is in the ER very badly beaten and the Officer gets asked a simple question "Why didn't you arrest the boyfriend?"
    It's a thankless task being a cop, but I still want to keep the job. I follow policy, report everything, and then pass it on to the DA. CYA every time.
  • Options
    TxsTxs Member Posts: 18,801
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Classic095
    The police dont have to be at the scene to determine if there is cause to arrest.Do the police see bank robbers rob the bank?? Arrests are made everyday in murder cases where the police have been no where near at the time of the crime. I think the cops in this tale didnt want to go through the paperwork and hassle..

    Hey! Cop! you didnt see me do it so you cant arrest me....LMAOThe way you're making it sound, when any criminal offense occurs in your state all people have to do is call the cops and tell their side of the story. Even if the cop didn't witness the offense and the suspect was no longer there when he arrived, he immediately hunts down the suspect and throws him in jail without obtaining an arrest warrant. No matter how clear the evidence is, due to our Constitution it doesn't work that way anywhere in the country.

    In every state a peace officer's (or citizen's) ability to arrest without a warrant is different in the case of felony or misdemeanor offenses. For example in my state all criminal offenses witnessed by a peace officer are arrestable - provided the victim is willing to sign a complaint - but most non-witnessed misdemeanors require that the evidence be presented to a magistrate, who then makes a determination if probable cause exists to issue an arrest warrant. Then and only then can the suspect be jailed.

    In my state in order for a non-peace officer to make an arrest ('citizen's arrest') it must be either a felony, a misdemeanor which constitutes a breach of the peace or done to prevent the consequences of a theft.

    In the Texas scenario laid out by the original poster, since the suspect was no longer at the scene no warrantless arrest could be made as long as the suspect was no longer in proximity to pose further danger to the victim. This includes him being at their residence if she wished to go home.

    As related, medical assistance would be supplied if necessary, photos of any visible injuries made, affidavits obtained from the victim and witnesses, victim's assistance information (women's shelters, etc.) supplied to the female and a report filed. This report and evidence would then go to an investigator and an arrest warrant and protective order could be obtained.

    It's notable too that due to this involving 'family' violence the state could actually file an assault charge against the guy for what he did to her, even if she says she doesn't wish to press criminal charges. In this situation an arrest warrant would still still have to be obtained if the previously stated criteria aren't met.
  • Options
    remingtonoaksremingtonoaks Member Posts: 26,251 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm not in Texas, but here They have to have evidence (marks proving an attack)or have witnessed the violence themselves in domestic violence....That way someone can't just claim the attack and have friends lie to conform it just to get back at someone in an argument...
  • Options
    45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Neil,,, Same here in Ca. And I "thought" it was the same everywhere reguarding DV. Could be wrong. I mean we have the Laughtenburg Act. Thats federal. I think the Tx case you had a lazy cop that didn't want to be bothered. Bad Police work if you ask me.
  • Options
    mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,297 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    [}:)]I think you should have shot Punk 1 and Punk 2 and replaced them with a mexican or two. :) [}:)]
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • Options
    TxsTxs Member Posts: 18,801
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by mogley98
    [}:)]I think you should have shot Punk 1 and Punk 2 and replaced them with a mexican or two. :) [}:)]Then you learn that he and his brother had just discovered her prostituting his other small child on the street for crack, lost his cool and was now on his way to the police to report her actions. Still not completely right on his part, but maybe enough to keep me from calling for his immediate execution.

    It's a complicated world, so be careful with making knee-jerk decisions.
  • Options
    xericoxerico Member Posts: 125 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    UPDATE:

    The Police Officer at the scene was "ignorant" about Police Policy. I spoke with a Detective today regarding the incident. The young woman is pressing charges. The D.A. is moving forward with the case. The delay was exactly due to the reasons stated by the police officers in this thread. Since the Police Officer did not witness the attack, a detective has the responsibility of reviewing the case for the purpose of getting an arrest warrant. After reviewing the case, an arrest warrant was issued and the D.A. is going after the two low lifes. The Detective made it clear that they will not prevent a citizen from pressing charges. His job was to simply examine the case for the purpose of getting an arrest warrant. The D.A.'s Office will determine if the charges will be prosecutted.

    To clarify the situation:

    Police Officer was correct that they could not just arrest the guy. He was incorrect about the ability to press charges. He was definitely out of line suggesting that the young lady should cool off before pressing charges. Based on "listening" between the lines during my conversation with the detective, the officer at the scene had to be gently "reminded" of policy. No report was turned in last night. However, it was turned in bright and early this morning. Turns out one of the witnesses to the attack was a local City Government "Power Player". SHE didn't take kindly to a couple of scumbags roughing up a pregnant woman and made calls. Those calls probably prompted the gentle reminder.

    This area is a rural county slowly becoming more urban. The officer at the scene was attempting to avoid paperwork in my opinion. He has probably become a little jaded because domestic "spats" are still not uncommon in this area. Whatever his excuse, his attitude and opinions were definitely not indicative of most of our fine officers.

    In any event, it looks like justice will prevail. I hope the young woman sticks to it and makes sure that those two cowards get their just rewards.

    The greatest part of this entire episode was hearing my neighbor's very prim, very proper, peace loving, non-violent, Kumbaya wife exclaim "Those M*F*ers need their * beat good!" after hearing about the assault.
  • Options
    txlawdogtxlawdog Member Posts: 10,039 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I hope she sticks with it as well, most of the time they don't. This is probably the reason why Law Enforcement's hands are tied when it comes to these type cases. I agree, the officer sounded a bit lazy, he might have been getting off soon or who knows. Maybe he has dealt with this victim before? Again, who knows.

    No one deserves to be laid a hand on. Again, hopefully, she will follow through. Good for you all for stepping in and supporting her, she probably has had none of that in her life.
  • Options
    45long45long Member Posts: 642 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    xerico,, yeah. Thats about what I thought. I had suspected that it wasn't in a large metro area. A lot of places still don't mind to much if Bubba smack mama around a little as long as it's not to bad.

    I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall at the officers "gentle reminder" *LOL* Bet he don'take that mistake again.
Sign In or Register to comment.