In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Secret Service Agent should be imprisoned
Navybat
Member Posts: 6,849 ✭✭✭
So this "23 year veteran" states that the heck with the law; she supports Hillary and won't take a bullet for Trump.
Hmmm...sounds like unprofessional at best and criminal at worst.
Fire her and convict her of treason. (Or whatever is the worst charge you can make stick).
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/24/politics/secret-service-agent-trump-bullet/index.html
Hmmm...sounds like unprofessional at best and criminal at worst.
Fire her and convict her of treason. (Or whatever is the worst charge you can make stick).
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/24/politics/secret-service-agent-trump-bullet/index.html
Comments
If it's really true, then shame on her; the job isn't to protect those on "both sides", it's to protect the persons to whom you are assigned. Period.
Neal
CNN? Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. Show it to me in black-and-white, & I'll take their word for it.
If it's really true, then shame on her; the job isn't to protect those on "both sides", it's to protect the persons to whom you are assigned. Period.
Neal
Pretty widely reported...
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/2017/01/25/secret-service-agent-won't-take-bullet-trump/97023204/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/senior-secret-service-agent-suggests-she-wouldnt-take-a-bullet-for-trump/article/2612814
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/secret-service-bullet-president-security/2017/01/24/id/770210/
DEMOCRATS are DEMOCRATs first.
As long as these partisan hacks will "fall on a grenade" for Obama or the Clintons, bad attitudes and incompetence are not only accepted, but rewarded.
No wonder Washington is broke.
quote:Originally posted by nmyers
CNN? Maybe it happened, maybe it didn't. Show it to me in black-and-white, & I'll take their word for it.
If it's really true, then shame on her; the job isn't to protect those on "both sides", it's to protect the persons to whom you are assigned. Period.
Neal
Pretty widely reported...
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/2017/01/25/secret-service-agent-won't-take-bullet-trump/97023204/
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/senior-secret-service-agent-suggests-she-wouldnt-take-a-bullet-for-trump/article/2612814
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/secret-service-bullet-president-security/2017/01/24/id/770210/
Gee Neo, you must have access to The Google. Not many people do...[;)]
So this "23 year veteran" states that the heck with the law; she supports Hillary and won't take a bullet for Trump.
Hmmm...sounds like unprofessional at best and criminal at worst.
Fire her and convict her of treason. (Or whatever is the worst charge you can make stick).
http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/24/politics/secret-service-agent-trump-bullet/index.html
WTH is a woman doing in a mans job anyway??? PC=BS
The sad thing is he can't fire her, she's a minority, but he could give her the post of protecting his turds as they float down the sewer [:D]
Or what is known as "PPP"--Presidential Potty Patrol". [}:)]
quote:Originally posted by remingtonoaks
The sad thing is he can't fire her, she's a minority, but he could give her the post of protecting his turds as they float down the sewer [:D]
Or what is known as "PPP"--Presidential Potty Patrol". [}:)]
Or even better yet, they could make her the official food taster to make sure there's no poison In it, of course she would have to wait until after he passed through his body [:D]
Or, was she the prostitute?
We must delve deep to disclose the facts of this matter.
She can hide behind 'freedom of speech' unless she violated a SS 'no no',,,,,,,
However, they can use an old FBI trick(when they wanted to get rid of someone), she will be transferred every six months or less to the least desirable location/job,,,,,,,[:o)]
Freedom of speech does not protect you in the work place. I guarantee she violated a conduct policy. She's got the time in they'll just make her retire. She's probably already had her retirement plans in the works and figured she'd speak her mind on the way out.
Bye Felicia Ask yourself, who would want a middle aged woman protecting them in the first place? She is likely in criminal investigations, not protection anyways.
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by forgemonkey
She can hide behind 'freedom of speech' unless she violated a SS 'no no',,,,,,,
However, they can use an old FBI trick(when they wanted to get rid of someone), she will be transferred every six months or less to the least desirable location/job,,,,,,,[:o)]
Freedom of speech does not protect you in the work place. I guarantee she violated a conduct policy. She's got the time in they'll just make her retire. She's probably already had her retirement plans in the works and figured she'd speak her mind on the way out.
Bye Felicia Ask yourself, who would want a middle aged woman protecting them in the first place? She is likely in criminal investigations, not protection anyways.
Interesting,,,,,,,,a judge said this morning she does have freedom of speech protection.
Oh, she does. But, she doesn't have a right to say what ever she wants, if she wants to keep her job.
Just because the government can't jail you, doesn't mean that your employer can't fire you.
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by forgemonkey
She can hide behind 'freedom of speech' unless she violated a SS 'no no',,,,,,,
However, they can use an old FBI trick(when they wanted to get rid of someone), she will be transferred every six months or less to the least desirable location/job,,,,,,,[:o)]
Freedom of speech does not protect you in the work place. I guarantee she violated a conduct policy. She's got the time in they'll just make her retire. She's probably already had her retirement plans in the works and figured she'd speak her mind on the way out.
Bye Felicia Ask yourself, who would want a middle aged woman protecting them in the first place? She is likely in criminal investigations, not protection anyways.
Interesting,,,,,,,,a judge said this morning she does have freedom of speech protection.
This is just Internet BS without a link in my opinion. And I doubt there is a judge that is stupid enough to say that she does not have to hold to her code of ethics contract that she swore to uphold.so Until you produce a link saying that she is exempt from holding to her sworn oath of ethics. I think this is just fake news like what all the Other Democrats like throw around. JMO
quote:Originally posted by Oso2142
quote:Originally posted by forgemonkey
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by forgemonkey
She can hide behind 'freedom of speech' unless she violated a SS 'no no',,,,,,,
However, they can use an old FBI trick(when they wanted to get rid of someone), she will be transferred every six months or less to the least desirable location/job,,,,,,,[:o)]
Freedom of speech does not protect you in the work place. I guarantee she violated a conduct policy. She's got the time in they'll just make her retire. She's probably already had her retirement plans in the works and figured she'd speak her mind on the way out.
Bye Felicia Ask yourself, who would want a middle aged woman protecting them in the first place? She is likely in criminal investigations, not protection anyways.
Interesting,,,,,,,,a judge said this morning she does have freedom of speech protection.
Oh, she does. But, she doesn't have a right to say what ever she wants, if she wants to keep her job.
Just because the government can't jail you, doesn't mean that your employer can't fire you.
Oso,,,,,,,,,
Don't misunderstand me, I think she should be fired. Albeit, we all know firing a government employee 'can' be troublesome.
Also, the SS is trying to determine if she posted her diatribe while on duty,,,,,,,which, to me, indicates they are reluctant to outright fire her.
As mentioned above, they can make it so uncomfortable she will quit/retire,,,,,
Haha, look at all the quotes, lol. Anyway, I didn't read anything into what you posted. I thought you were just repeating what you heard.
To be clear, you're fine with me - always have been - most likely, always will be.
As far as firing her, I think that the SS will do whatever is in their best interest. If she needs to be retired, I bet they do that. If she needs to be fired, I think they'll do that. If they need to station her in Alaska, until she retires, I bet they'll do that. Either way, I'm not too worried about it. In other words, I think the president's in good hands.
"Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee
Should be fired today. With no recourse. She violated her oath.
+1,,
quote:Originally posted by forgemonkey
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by forgemonkey
She can hide behind 'freedom of speech' unless she violated a SS 'no no',,,,,,,
However, they can use an old FBI trick(when they wanted to get rid of someone), she will be transferred every six months or less to the least desirable location/job,,,,,,,[:o)]
Freedom of speech does not protect you in the work place. I guarantee she violated a conduct policy. She's got the time in they'll just make her retire. She's probably already had her retirement plans in the works and figured she'd speak her mind on the way out.
Bye Felicia Ask yourself, who would want a middle aged woman protecting them in the first place? She is likely in criminal investigations, not protection anyways.
Interesting,,,,,,,,a judge said this morning she does have freedom of speech protection.
Oh, she does. But, she doesn't have a right to say what ever she wants, if she wants to keep her job.
Just because the government can't jail you, doesn't mean that your employer can't fire you.
Exactly...the 1st Amendment does not protect you from the consequences of your speech. When it comes to your employer. Any conduct that reflects poorly on an employer provides them an opportunity to terminate your employment.
I suspect another employee turned her in for her atrocious comments. The follies of social media strikes again!! I wonder if alcohol was involved? Fortunately her being in Denver indicates she is in criminal investigations, not a primary in a protective detail. I suspect a nice quiet retirement is coming, no office party for her. Gold watch will be shipped by Fed Ex.