In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

New Assault Weapons Ban??

pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,844 ✭✭✭✭
edited June 2008 in General Discussion
Here is a new AWB proposal to chew on. (Introduced Jun 12, 2008)

(quote)
(a) RESTRICTION- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after subsection (u) the following:

`(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.
(/quote)

I see there is some grandfathering.
Not the point at this time.

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h110-6257

It isn't so much that I fear this will go anywhere in an election year, but what might be more interesting to note, is that it was introduced by a REPUBLICAN.
And, that ALL THREE cosponsors "so far" are REPUBLICANS.

Hmmmmm...........just a thought, isn't McAmnesty a Republican too?

Comments

  • CHEVELLE427CHEVELLE427 Member Posts: 6,750
    edited November -1
    BETTER BUY THEM WHILE YOU CAN BOYS & GIRLS [:(][:(!][:(]
  • watrulookinatwatrulookinat Member Posts: 4,693
    edited November -1
    quote:?(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.[:0][:0]
  • CHEVELLE427CHEVELLE427 Member Posts: 6,750
    edited November -1
    `(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any semiautomatic assault weapon otherwise lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of the enactment of this subsection.
  • KEVD18KEVD18 Member Posts: 15,037
    edited November -1
    the person with the least firearm related knowledge of course...
  • watrulookinatwatrulookinat Member Posts: 4,693
    edited November -1
    Roger that Chevelle.
  • CHEVELLE427CHEVELLE427 Member Posts: 6,750
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by watrulookinat
    Roger that Chevelle.


    IF IT IS LIKE LAST TIMe WE GOT TO KEEP THEM .
    its just the price got so high we could not buy any. think ill look for some SKS AND AK. might be an investment, my luck they will confiscate them this time
  • brickmaster1248brickmaster1248 Member Posts: 3,344
    edited November -1
    i guess it would be a good time and go and purchase that FN-FAL ive been wanting.
  • KEVD18KEVD18 Member Posts: 15,037
    edited November -1
    if i had the money, id dump thousands into stripped lowers(or whatever the numbers part for a particular gun is). buy em by the case, seal em up and store em. might come in handy...

    but alas i havent been able to afford a new gun for my own personal recreation in quite some time. i certainly dont have the available capitol to sink into firearms speculation.
  • watrulookinatwatrulookinat Member Posts: 4,693
    edited November -1
    Yeah, you could trade the lowers for gas.
  • medic07medic07 Member Posts: 5,222 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The bill was introduced and cosponsored by Repubs...asshats.

    Of course...look where they are from:
    Rep. Mark Kirk [R-IL]
    Cosponsors [as of 2008-06-13]
    Rep. Michael Castle [R-DE]
    Rep. Michael Ferguson [R-NJ]
    Rep. Christopher Shays [R-CT]

    All gun hating...2nd Amend hating...states.
  • kyplumberkyplumber Member Posts: 11,111
    edited November -1
    here is why they don't want you armed with a formidable weapon!


    http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=6999
  • sarge_3adsarge_3ad Member Posts: 8,387 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by medic07
    The bill was introduced and cosponsored by Repubs...asshats.

    Of course...look where they are from:
    Rep. Mark Kirk [R-IL]
    Cosponsors [as of 2008-06-13]
    Rep. Michael Castle [R-DE]
    Rep. Michael Ferguson [R-NJ]
    Rep. Christopher Shays [R-CT]

    All gun hating...2nd Amend hating...states.



    Just goes to show you, there is no difference between the the neocons and the socialist dems. They all want to disarm America so they can control us before they declare North America a union.
  • 1776-19761776-1976 Member Posts: 284 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A SEMI AUTO ASSAULT RIFLE. IN ORDER FOR A RIFLE TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A TRUE ASSAULT WEAPON IT MUST HAVE THE ABILITY TO FIRE FULLY AUTOMATIC. The day is coming. Are you prepared?
  • dheffleydheffley Member Posts: 25,000
    edited November -1
    Are they going to go by the old definition of assualt weapon?
  • JamesRKJamesRK Member Posts: 25,670 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I guess that pretty much outlaws the M1 rifle.
    The road to hell is paved with COMPROMISE.
  • dheffleydheffley Member Posts: 25,000
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by JamesRK
    I guess that pretty much outlaws the M1 rifle.


    After re-reading that, you are right. The only hope would be that it is considered and antique since it is on the curio and relic list.
  • moonshinemoonshine Member Posts: 8,471
    edited November -1
    I need more ammo!!!
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,540 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    This needs to be a Sticky !!!
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,540 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    What is the Oct. 1993 Date?
    SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON MANUFACTURE, TRANSFER, AND POSSESSION OF CERTAIN SEMIAUTOMATIC ASSAULT WEAPONS.

    (a) RESTRICTION- Section 922 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding after subsection (u) the following:

    `(v)(1) It shall be unlawful for a person to manufacture, transfer, or possess a semiautomatic assault weapon.

    `(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to the possession or transfer of any semiautomatic assault weapon otherwise lawfully possessed under Federal law on the date of the enactment of this subsection.

    `(3) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--

    `(A) any of the firearms, or replicas or duplicates of the firearms, specified in appendix A to this section, as such firearms were manufactured on October 1, 1993;
  • CaptplaidCaptplaid Member Posts: 20,298 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by sarge_3ad
    quote:Originally posted by medic07
    The bill was introduced and cosponsored by Repubs...asshats.

    Of course...look where they are from:
    Rep. Mark Kirk [R-IL]
    Cosponsors [as of 2008-06-13]
    Rep. Michael Castle [R-DE]
    Rep. Michael Ferguson [R-NJ]
    Rep. Christopher Shays [R-CT]

    All gun hating...2nd Amend hating...states.



    Just goes to show you, there is no difference between the the neocons and the socialist dems. They all want to disarm America so they can control us before they declare North America a union.


    The term "Neo-COnservative" was created by socially liberal democratianss who jumped the democratian boat when they realized the party was too soft on national security. Joe Lieberman is your typical Neo-Con. He's as far left as they com except on national security issues.

    Neo-Cons are not Reagan Republicans.
  • CaptplaidCaptplaid Member Posts: 20,298 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Interesting. They are implementing the old AWB just like nothing changed since the bans expiration. If you bought something after the b'93 they want it covered.

    Mark Kirk is a Chicago Republican from a affluent (rich) district. He's pandering for the Chicago vote even though this is a kiss of death for many many other Congressmen.
  • shoff14shoff14 Member Posts: 11,994 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • mr_floppymr_floppy Member Posts: 1,090 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Kirk just accidentally pulled this stunt.

    http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0608/GOP_slip_if_we_see_Obama_theres_a_shootonsight_order.html
    quote:GOP slip: "if we see Obama there's a shoot-on-sight order."
    Interviewed on the Don Wade & Roma in the Morning show Wednesday, Rep. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) said that he supports a policy "where if we see Obama there's a shoot-on-sight order."

    His office didn't immediately return a call and he clearly, given the context of the conversation, meant to refer to Osama bin Laden.

    Listen here.

    UPDATE: Kirk apologizes: "On Wednesday, I misspoke when talking with a local Chicago radio program regarding the current presidential campaign of Senator Barack Obama as well as the status of our anti-terrorism efforts against Osama Bin Laden. During the course of this conversation, I mistakenly referred to 'Osama' as 'Obama. After being alerted to my mistake, I apologized to Senator Obama for my misstatement and will take extra care to make sure I do not make such a mistake again."

    No doubt he will.
  • GotteskriegerGotteskrieger Member Posts: 3,170 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by kyplumber
    here is why they don't want you armed with a formidable weapon!


    http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=6999


    AS I LIVE AND BREATH THIS WOULD BE IT![:(!]
  • lindalecowboylindalecowboy Member Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by CHEVELLE427
    quote:Originally posted by watrulookinat
    Roger that Chevelle.


    IF IT IS LIKE LAST TIMe WE GOT TO KEEP THEM .
    its just the price got so high we could not buy any. think ill look for some SKS AND AK. might be an investment, my luck they will confiscate them this time


    something about "cold dead fingers and the barrel".........
Sign In or Register to comment.