In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

China trying to buy GM and Chrysler

select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,520 ✭✭✭✭
edited November 2008 in General Discussion
http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/breaking-news-Chinese-may-buy-gm-and-chrysler/


Chinese Automakers May Buy GM and Chrysler
By Bertel Schmitt
November 18, 2008 -



Chinese carmakers SAIC and Dongfeng have plans to acquire GM and Chrysler, China's 21st Century Business Herald reports today. [A National Enquirer the paper is not. It is one of China's leading business newspapers, with a daily readership over three million.] The paper cites a senior official of China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology- the state regulator of China's auto industry- who dropped the hint that "the auto manufacturing giants in China, such as Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) and Dongfeng Motor Corporation, have the capability and intention to buy some assets of the two crisis-plagued American automakers." These hints are very often followed with quick action in the Middle Kingdom. The hints were dropped just a few days after the same Chinese government gave its auto makers the go-ahead to invest abroad. And why would they do that?


A take-over of a large overseas auto maker would fit perfectly into China's plans. As reported before, China has realized that its export chances are slim without unfettered access to foreign technology. The brand cachet of Chinese cars abroad is, shall we say, challenged. The Chinese could easily export Made-in-China VWs, Toyotas, Buicks. If their joint venture partner would let them. The solution: Buy the joint venture partner. Especially, when he's in deep trouble.

At current market valuations (GM is worth less than Mattel) the Chinese government can afford to buy GM with petty cash. Even a hundred billion $ would barely dent China's more than $2t in currency reserves. For nobody in the world would buying GM and (while they are at it) Chrysler make more sense than for the Chinese. Overlap? What overlap? They would gain instant access to the world's markets with accepted brands, and proven technology.

21st Century Business Herald, obviously with input from higher-up, writes that Chinese industry must change and upgrade. China wants their factories to change from low-value-added manufacturing to technically innovative and financially-sound high-value-add industries. Says the paper: "It would be much easier now for strong Chinese automakers to go global by acquiring some assets of their U.S. counterparts in times of crisis."

Deloitte & Touche sees a trend: "Chinese automakers can start with buying out the OEM projects and Chinese ventures of some global carmakers such as GM and Chrysler."

The Chinese appear to have bigger plans than an accounting firm can imagine. 21st Century Business Herald acts and writes as if its already a done deal, and the beginning of more to come. "In the coming two years China is likely to see a few of its large Chinese automakers and other manufacturing enterprises set a precedent for achieving globalization by acquiring global companies, just like SAIC or Dongfeng's possible acquisition of troubled GM or Chrysler."

Just in case you missed it, the Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation (SAIC) is China's largest auto manufacturer. In 1984, the company entered a joint venture with Volkswagen. A decade later, SAIC entered a joint venture with General Motors. In 2007, SAIC bought the Nanjing Automobile Corporation, which had acquired British MG Rover in 2005.

Dongfeng Motor Corporation is a public company, although 70 percent of their shares are reported to be in government hands. They also are one of China's Big Three. The company has numerous joint venture partners, such as Nissan, Peugeot-Citroen, Honda, and Kia. Dongfeng (which means "East Wind") was founded at the behest of Mao Zedong himself in 1968.

Comments

  • mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Too bad they didn't sell to the chinese before they lost 100billion in value!
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • footlongfootlong Member Posts: 8,009
    edited November -1
    I can see it now. Wallyworld selling Silverados and Corvettes.
    All made of that wonder metal BAMBOONIUM[:D][:D][:D]
  • dan kellydan kelly Member Posts: 9,799
    edited November -1
    chinas the only country with money to spare now...they have been bending over backwards to buy into mines here...so far they have only been succesful in getting involved with starting new mines....but for how long is anyones guess....if they get control of big established mines here it will be curtains for the counrty...we will be hit harder than when the japs bought into mining here in the 1980`s...things have only started improving in the last 5 years or so.
  • LaidbackDanLaidbackDan Member Posts: 13,142 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I wonder what kind of trade-in allowance I would get for my 1999 water buffalo for the new 2010 Dongfeng?
  • remingtonoaksremingtonoaks Member Posts: 26,245 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    "have the capability and intention to buy some assets of the two crisis-plagued American automakers."

    Ba- By UAW, could have worked for an American Co. for $45...But no, now you can work for a foreigner for that or less[:D][:D][:D]
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,520 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by remingtonoaks
    "have the capability and intention to buy some assets of the two crisis-plagued American automakers."

    Ba- By UAW[:D][:D][:D]


    UAW.. U are wong.
  • cahascahas Member Posts: 4,064
    edited November -1
    Apple pie and Chinolet . Nope dont work.
  • remingtonoaksremingtonoaks Member Posts: 26,245 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by select-fire
    quote:Originally posted by remingtonoaks
    "have the capability and intention to buy some assets of the two crisis-plagued American automakers."

    Ba- By UAW[:D][:D][:D]


    UAW.. U are wong.


    Probably...Some of the 15% unemployed will jump all over it though
  • Aspen79seAspen79se Member Posts: 4,707
    edited November -1
    Chrysler, I could believe. GM, I doubt it.
  • remingtonoaksremingtonoaks Member Posts: 26,245 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Aspen79se
    Chrysler, I could believe. GM, I doubt it.



    Don't doubt it to much.


    21st Century Business Herald acts and writes as if its already a done deal,
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,520 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    C -- Chevrolet
    H-- Here
    I -- In
    N-- North
    A--America
  • scrumpyjackscrumpyjack Member Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    GM has already surpassed Volkswagen as the #1 seller of passenger cars in China. The Chinese market continues to boom while the US market drops like a rock. In a few more years, GM will probably sell more cars in China than in the US. The Chinese are buying everything they can get their hands on, this only makes sense that they would look to buy parts of GM & Chrysler.
  • cahascahas Member Posts: 4,064
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by scrumpyjack
    GM has already surpassed Volkswagen as the #1 seller of passenger cars in China. The Chinese market continues to boom while the US market drops like a rock. In a few more years, GM will probably sell more cars in China than in the US. The Chinese are buying everything they can get their hands on, this only makes sense that they would look to buy parts of GM & Chrysler.

    I wondered why Chevrolet dropped that slogan.
  • MFinnMFinn Member Posts: 2,095 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Great, maybe they can run them better[:)]
  • remingtonoaksremingtonoaks Member Posts: 26,245 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    New for the 2010 model year, the all new Chevrolet Rickshaw
  • Warpig883Warpig883 Member Posts: 6,459
    edited November -1
    That is a pretty interesting article.

    It will be interesting to see if the UAW can hurt China like it has the US.
  • remingtonoaksremingtonoaks Member Posts: 26,245 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Warpig883
    That is a pretty interesting article.

    It will be interesting to see if the UAW can hurt China like it has the US.


    China is not buying the Companies, just the assets... So no contracts go with it
  • 50-70RB50-70RB Member Posts: 706 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    This would fit in nicely with China's HUGE espionage efforts here in the U.S. which the Chinese government officially denies. They hit the Pentagon's computers alone many thousands of times a day. They have hundreds of companies here that are for the purpose of spying, stealing technology and they're accomplishing it. They must think the U.S. is the biggest sucker in the world. Many good
    articles/books exist on the Oriental mind set, especially with respect to business dealings, power, trutworthyness. The stooges that are borrowing millions of dollars from them are no doubt thought of by the Chinese behind closed doors as western fools.
  • dan kellydan kelly Member Posts: 9,799
    edited November -1
    50-70..i read an article a few years ago about china spying on the u.s.a....according to someone the u.s. turned to work for them, china expects every chinese is the u.s. to work for them whenever the need comes up....even 3rd and 4th generation chinese...and from what i read, they do...and the u.s. government knew then, and would of course know now, yet they still appoint chinese into highly sensative positions..it makes me scratch my head wondering why, but thats governments for you...made up of high paid idiots.
  • Aspen79seAspen79se Member Posts: 4,707
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by remingtonoaks
    quote:Originally posted by Aspen79se
    Chrysler, I could believe. GM, I doubt it.



    Don't doubt it to much.


    21st Century Business Herald acts and writes as if its already a done deal,



    Large print and color don't help you make a point.

    GM has pieces it could cut lose, i.e. GMC, Chevy, Pontiac, etc. Ford is in the same situation. They can cut the divisions holding them down, and refocus that money. Chrysler doesn't have that option, or the option of raising money via stock sales. Mercedes cut Chrysler lose for a reason, it was dragging them down. If the Germans can't make something run efficiently, I doubt anyone can.

    A more realistic buy out for Chrysler is Toyota, Honda, or Nissan. They already have operations here in the States, and can do a take over faster. Although, who would want to buy a crap company like Chrysler is beyond me.
  • iceracerxiceracerx Member Posts: 8,860 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Aspen79se


    Mercedes cut Chrysler lose for a reason, it was dragging them down. If the Germans can't make something run efficiently, I doubt anyone can.

    A more realistic buy out for Chrysler is Toyota, Honda, or Nissan. They already have operations here in the States, and can do a take over faster. Although, who would want to buy a crap company like Chrysler is beyond me.


    Chrysler was dragging MB down? Chrysler was the play ground for Dieter Zetsche and Wolfgang Bernard. They couldn't check their egos at the door and thought themselves car "stylists".
    When Cerberus took over there were SEVEN SUVs in the lineup. Do you really think that the UAW had a hand in that?

    The first thing that MB did to Chrysler was absorb Chrysler Financial. When you lose your banking arm, it's hard to turn a profit. But you guys know that, right?
  • Aspen79seAspen79se Member Posts: 4,707
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by iceracerx
    quote:Originally posted by Aspen79se


    Mercedes cut Chrysler lose for a reason, it was dragging them down. If the Germans can't make something run efficiently, I doubt anyone can.

    A more realistic buy out for Chrysler is Toyota, Honda, or Nissan. They already have operations here in the States, and can do a take over faster. Although, who would want to buy a crap company like Chrysler is beyond me.


    Chrysler was dragging MB down? Chrysler was the play ground for Dieter Zetsche and Wolfgang Bernard. They couldn't check their egos at the door and thought themselves car "stylists".
    When Cerberus took over there were SEVEN SUVs in the lineup. Do you really think that the UAW had a hand in that?

    The first thing that MB did to Chrysler was absorb Chrysler Financial. When you lose your banking arm, it's hard to turn a profit. But you guys know that, right?


    Care to point out where I said UAW was to blame?

    MB would've kept them if the brand was offering anything that benefited the company, it wasn't. So, they dumped it. It was a good decision. You don't see MB begging for money, do you? Chrysler will fold or be bought out within a year.
  • Lucky_LeftyLucky_Lefty Member Posts: 7,971
    edited November -1
    My mother called and said that GM built a plant near her home to make parts, but since all these talks about going under they canceled the contract with them and now hundreds are out of jobs. I really want a jeep wrangler but not if they sell out to the chinamen. I guess I will wait to see what happens.
Sign In or Register to comment.