In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Fighting Terrorism and you can't make this up
TooBig
Member Posts: 28,559 ✭✭✭
Traitor-in-Chief Removes Iran from Terror List, Praises it for Fighting Terrorism
Mar 17, 2015 04:40 am
By Daniel Greenfield
Inexplicably, Obama removed Iran from America's terror list, and is praising them for fighting terrorism.
Traitor-in-Chief Removes Iran from Terror List, Praises it for Fighting Terrorism
[xx(]
Mar 17, 2015 04:40 am
By Daniel Greenfield
Inexplicably, Obama removed Iran from America's terror list, and is praising them for fighting terrorism.
Traitor-in-Chief Removes Iran from Terror List, Praises it for Fighting Terrorism
[xx(]
Comments
Traitor-in-Chief Removes Iran from Terror List, Praises it for Fighting Terrorism
Mar 17, 2015 04:40 am
By Daniel Greenfield
Inexplicably, Obama removed Iran from America's terror list, and is praising them for fighting terrorism.
Traitor-in-Chief Removes Iran from Terror List, Praises it for Fighting Terrorism
[xx(]
Peace is at hand! Now lets get Israel on Board!
serf
you gotta be FNG kidding me ????..from our muslim-in-chief...next will be most favored nation status and no inspection imported burkas...when will this country WAKE UP
Yeah, you really can make this stuff up!
http://www.newsweek.com/iran-and-hezbollah-omitted-us-terror-threat-list-amid-nuclear-talks-314073
These people are not on our side, never have been. The folks that voted for them simply chose to ignore the facts, just like the people that will vote for Hilderbeast. Liberals have never let facts get in the way of a good decision.
W.D.
Anyone have a link to this?
Apparently it is Jim Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence who pulled Iran off the National Intelligence list. No mention of Obummer's name, but then talking about Jim Clapper would not serve any useful agenda. I believe that Clapper is a former Air Force general who's served under four Presidents; including Dim Bulb One and his son, DB-II
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/03/16/402070/Iran-removed-from-terrorist-threats
By the way: You do realize that you are a liberal, a troll and an Obama lover (and quite possibly a Muslim) for requesting this link. Accepting everything posted at face value will make your stay here in the forum much more pleasant.
No green font[?]
"By the way: You do realize that you are a liberal, a troll and an Obama lover (and quite possibly a Muslim) for requesting this link. Accepting everything posted at face value will make your stay here in the forum much more pleasant."
No green font[?]
Not always required to make the point being made. [}:)] [:)][:D][:o)][:p][8][;)][|)][:I][;)][:D]
quote:Originally posted by Tech141
"By the way: You do realize that you are a liberal, a troll and an Obama lover (and quite possibly a Muslim) for requesting this link. Accepting everything posted at face value will make your stay here in the forum much more pleasant."
No green font[?]
Not always required to make the point being made. [}:)]
I wondered where you were at, but knowing what day it is I figured you were attending a GLTG parade and then stopped by your local mosque for a flag burning.
Green for those who have been inoculated against HISS: Humor, Irony, Sarcasm and Satire.
quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
Anyone have a link to this?
Apparently it is Jim Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence who pulled Iran off the National Intelligence list. No mention of Obummer's name, but then talking about Jim Clapper would not serve any useful agenda. I believe that Clapper is a former Air Force general who's served under four Presidents; including Dim Bulb One and his son, DB-II
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/03/16/402070/Iran-removed-from-terrorist-threats
By the way: You do realize that you are a liberal, a troll and an Obama lover (and quite possibly a Muslim) for requesting this link. Accepting everything posted at face value will make your stay here in the forum much more pleasant.
When you get finished with a good daily dose of condescension, maybe you could look up who appoints the Director of National Intelligence to his post, and who the DNI reports to.
When you finish with that, maybe you can explain how top level members of any administration operate independently and do things such as that under discussion here without the knowledge and approval of the CiC who put them in place.
Leaders are responsible for the actions of their subordinates. People who have been in leadership positions understand that reality and refrain from mailing silly implications that the subordinates did something as substantial as removing one the most longstanding state sponsors of terrorism from a listing of same without consulting at length with the CiC.
BTW, I didn't have to accept anything at face value, as the story in question was in the news in multiple locations. Perhaps some have heard of the 'News Media'. They have newspapers, TV, radio, and this newfangled thing called the InterWeb. Great resource. I recommend it highly.
quote:Originally posted by mark christian
quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
Anyone have a link to this?
Apparently it is Jim Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence who pulled Iran off the National Intelligence list. No mention of Obummer's name, but then talking about Jim Clapper would not serve any useful agenda. I believe that Clapper is a former Air Force general who's served under four Presidents; including Dim Bulb One and his son, DB-II
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/03/16/402070/Iran-removed-from-terrorist-threats
By the way: You do realize that you are a liberal, a troll and an Obama lover (and quite possibly a Muslim) for requesting this link. Accepting everything posted at face value will make your stay here in the forum much more pleasant.
When you get finished with a good daily dose of condescension, maybe you could look up who appoints the Director of National Intelligence to his post, and who the DNI reports to.
When you finish with that, maybe you can explain how top level members of any administration operate independently and do things such as that under discussion here without the knowledge and approval of the CiC who put them in place.
I didn't buy into Reagan and Iran-Contra either...But Reagan pulled it off, and Obummer will do the same. That is exactly why guys like
Robert McFarlane (Iran-Contra) and James Clapper are given their positions...Someone has to take the fall.
There is no daily dose; condescension is given PRN.
This is closely related to the nuclear 'agreement' that The One is currently trying to reach with Iran, and is intended to portray Iran as some poor, misunderstood folks who just hope we can all get along.
When a supposed leader is more focused on burnishing his foreign policy credentials by reaching an agreement, any agreement, rather than negotiating said agreement in the best interests of the country he is tasked with leading, things just may take a turn for the surreal.
I am pretty sure I can't help you.
Reassuring news.
No green needed or intended.
I appreciate Marks input, the invisible green was obvious [:)]
I searched for links to this claim. Found only loud typing in varied questionable places. Then checked a few .GOV's I know of. Found Iran still listed as a State terror supporter.
So I asked for links.
Maybe when I get home there will be more news sites to check, more that are caught up.
Limited here working from a smartphone....
Rhetorical white flag seen and acknowledged.
Not so much really. As I said, I was busy and limited by being on my smart phone. I seriously do not like typing on that tiny thing.
The story was put out by Iran's PRESSTV. Some of our own American citizens made the choice to believe it, quoted it as fact. It fit their fantasies, so they believed it. I wish I could say I am surprised, but, well, you know ... no Obama is not a Muslim. Just a Democrat who came along at the perfect moment to get elected. If not for the right wing putting lousy candidates against him, he would have lost. Folks cannot deal with such truth, they have to make crap up to make themselves and "their side" not responsible for losing.
I am damned sick and tired of these "sides".
Anyway, to the original post - You will find the original source material in the link below. There is an opening statement and the much larger threat assessment. Clapper does not praise Iran nor remove it from the list of state terror sponsors.
The opening remarks are brief, touch a few highlights. Much of it is about ISIL/ISIS. The opening remarks mention Iran's actions against ISIS. Which should be expected considering it is being presented before the US Senate Armed Services Committee.
The full report cites numerous terror support activities of Iran that are ongoing. Too many accusations of Iran being a state sponsor of terror.
Iran's PRESSTV, with certain Americans in unknowing cahoots, created a little propaganda. This should not be a surprise to anyone. Sadly, it is a surprise to many.
http://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/testimonies
quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
Anyone have a link to this?
Apparently it is Jim Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence who pulled Iran off the National Intelligence list. No mention of Obummer's name, but then talking about Jim Clapper would not serve any useful agenda. I believe that Clapper is a former Air Force general who's served under four Presidents; including Dim Bulb One and his son, DB-II
http://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2015/03/16/402070/Iran-removed-from-terrorist-threats
By the way: You do realize that you are a liberal, a troll and an Obama lover (and quite possibly a Muslim) for requesting this link. Accepting everything posted at face value will make your stay here in the forum much more pleasant.
Facts have a known liberal bias.
The reason I have them is because I read them, and compare them year to year. As with many other documents from many other sources related to ongoing political developments across the globe. Call it something North of a hobby.
What I am damned tired of is people who dip their toes into the information once and awhile and think they have learned something. When I read and study the way different countries are assessed and written about year to year, I see a pattern emerge, and I find it worrisome. The 2104 report mentioned Iran with some specificity in the 'Terrorism' section. The same section in the 2015 report makes no mention of Iran at all.
There are other differences in the reports both in actual language, and the nuance. I find them troubling. You are free to find them anything you want. But first you would have to have read more than the report mentioned in the OP so that the Gotcha Game can be played. That you have read the 'source material' for one report for one year will win you a Gold Star for today's game. And damn little else.
There are forces in play in the world that are far above the usual petty games dealing with elections in the US. Dismissing concern about them because someone uses language that you find objectionable is not something I find particularly thoughtful, but it also doesn't rise to the level of me worrying about educating the self-anointed experts.
We appear to read and save the same things, or similar at the very least.
Here's another link: http://video.foxnews.com/v/4119899376001/govt-terror-threat-report-omits-iran-hezbollah/?#sp=show-clips
Yes, Fox - but considering the other source is the Loony Left Newsweek, it seems we've covered the spectrum, and both sides agree.
With this regime anything marked ".GOV" is highly suspect. One might even learn from a .gov site that, "If you like your healthcare plan, you can keep it! Period!"
quote: I am damned sick and tired of these "sides".
Guys like you don't like sides, but when you do, it's always the side of our enemies.
The traitor should be taken out front of a firing squad and executed. We now let traitors lead the nation. UNBELIEVABLE!
Chris in Tempe or Obumah?
quote:Originally posted by 96harley
The traitor should be taken out front of a firing squad and executed. We now let traitors lead the nation. UNBELIEVABLE!
Chris in Tempe or Obumah?
Sorry. I can't go with that one. CiT can be a pain in my hiney and visa versa, I disagree with him very often, as he does with me, but I also think he is pretty much a thoughtful guy, and having read what he does for his brother, he does not deserve to be spoken of in that fashion.
In point of fact, no one here on GB does. Please disagree without being disagreeable.
quote:Originally posted by wiplash
quote:Originally posted by 96harley
The traitor should be taken out front of a firing squad and executed. We now let traitors lead the nation. UNBELIEVABLE!
Chris in Tempe or Obumah?
Sorry. I can't go with that one. CiT can be a pain in my hiney and visa versa, I disagree with him very often, as he does with me, but I also think he is pretty much a thoughtful guy, and having read what he does for his brother, he does not deserve to be spoken of in that fashion.
In point of fact, no one here on GB does. Please disagree without being disagreeable.
Maybe he missed my last post? Maybe he's a smart Troll.
http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=649650