In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

GB Automated E-Mail System

kimikimi Member Posts: 44,723 ✭✭✭
edited September 2014 in General Discussion
Does anyone know when the automated email system is going to be up and operating again?
What's next?

Comments

  • Options
    CaptFunCaptFun Member Posts: 16,678 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by kimi
    Does anyone know when the automated email system is going to be up and operating again?
    Whats wrong with it?
  • Options
    kimikimi Member Posts: 44,723 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    quote:Originally posted by kimi
    Does anyone know when the automated email system is going to be up and operating again?
    Whats wrong with it?


    I've tried to send out emails to two different parties and they have bounced, Captain. I really don't know what's wrong with it.

    Thanks for the reply.
    What's next?
  • Options
    Horse Plains DrifterHorse Plains Drifter Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 39,421 ***** Forums Admin
    edited November -1
    kimi, I just sent ya one. See if it makes it.
  • Options
    kimikimi Member Posts: 44,723 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Horse Plains Drifter
    kimi, I just sent ya one. See if it makes it.


    HPD, I have just sent you one. But I think it just bounced. Let me know if you got it.
    What's next?
  • Options
    OakieOakie Member Posts: 40,519 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I cannot send or receive emails through GB
  • Options
    Horse Plains DrifterHorse Plains Drifter Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 39,421 ***** Forums Admin
    edited November -1
    Nothing yet, Kimi.
  • Options
    kimikimi Member Posts: 44,723 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Horse Plains Drifter
    Nothing yet, kimi.


    Thanks! I am on the phone waiting for aol tech support.[:)]
    What's next?
  • Options
    kimikimi Member Posts: 44,723 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It seems that AOL & DMARC has a problem with this website. At least that is what I am told. ANyone else here have aol for their e-mail service?

    DMARC - What is it?

    http://dmarc.org/
    DMARC, which stands for "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance", is a technical specification created by a group of organizations that want to help reduce the potential for email-based abuse by solving a couple of long-standing operational, deployment, and reporting issues related to email authentication protocols.

    DMARC standardizes how email receivers perform email authentication using the well-known SPF and DKIM mechanisms. This means that senders will experience consistent authentication results for their messages at AOL, Gmail, Hotmail, Yahoo! and any other email receiver implementing DMARC. We hope this will encourage senders to more broadly authenticate their outbound email which can make email a more reliable way to communicate.

    Why is DMARC Important?

    With the rise of the social internet and the ubiquity of e-commerce, spammers and phishers have a tremendous financial incentive to compromise user accounts, enabling theft of passwords, bank accounts, credit cards, and more. Email is easy to spoof and criminals have found spoofing to be a proven way to exploit user trust of well-known brands. Simply inserting the logo of a well known brand into an email gives it instant legitimacy with many users.

    Users can't tell a real message from a fake one, and large mailbox providers have to make very difficult (and frequently incorrect) choices about which messages to deliver and which ones might harm users. Senders remain largely unaware of problems with their authentication practices because there's no scalable way for them to indicate they want feedback and where it should be sent. Those attempting new SPF and DKIM deployment proceed very slowly and cautiously because the lack of feedback also means they have no good way to monitor progress and debug problems.

    DMARC addresses these issues, helping email senders and receivers work together to better secure emails, protecting users and brands from painfully costly abuse.

    How Does DMARC Work?

    A DMARC policy allows a sender to indicate that their emails are protected by SPF and/or DKIM, and tells a receiver what to do if neither of those authentication methods passes - such as junk or reject the message. DMARC removes guesswork from the receiver's handling of these failed messages, limiting or eliminating the user's exposure to potentially fraudulent & harmful messages. DMARC also provides a way for the email receiver to report back to the sender about messages that pass and/or fail DMARC evaluation.

    Who Can Use DMARC?

    DMARC policies are published in the public Domain Name System (DNS), and available to everyone. Because the specification is available with no licensing or similar restriction, any interested party is free to implement it.

    Status of DMARC

    April 2, 2014: The DMARC specification has been submitted as an Informational Document to the RFC Independent Submissions Editor (ISE). Link to DMARC Specification.

    DMARC was developed by the organizations listed below over the course of several years. The specification was publicly announced on January 30th, 2012 and was immediately available for download from the DMARC.org website. A mailing list for anybody interested in reviewing or discussing the specification was announced and started seeing traffic the same day. Discussions on the list have provided a great deal of feedback on and input to the specification.

    After seeing dramatic adoption, DMARC was submitted to the IETF for standardization on March 31, 2013. That summer a BoF was held at IETF-87 (announcement, agenda and minutes) in Berlin to discuss chartering a working group to develop extensions and supporting documents like the Using DMARC best common practices (BCP) document.

    While there was enthusiasm around the proposed working group, there was also a strong sentiment among some respondents that either A) the specification was complete enough that there was nothing to warrant an IETF working group, or B) that the entire specification should be reconsidered from scratch, which would leave implementors and deployers in an uncertain situation for as long as several years, based on the pace of work on similar standards in the past.

    After a great deal of deliberation and exploring all options, the specification was switched to the Independent Submissions track effective April 2, 2014. The result will not be an IETF Internet Standard as originally envisioned by the DMARC.org member organizations. However it will provide a fixed reference document that can provide the basis for development on the Standards track at a later date.

    As of early 2013 DMARC had been deployed to protect roughly 2 billion email accounts - over 60% of consumer mailboxes globally, and over 80% of consumer mailboxes in the United States.
    What's next?
  • Options
    CaptFunCaptFun Member Posts: 16,678 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    AOL is anti gun and pulls this crap about 3 times a year, sometimes it is all emails and sometimes only the forums. I'll get the propeller heads to look into it. (Charter and comcast do it as well)
  • Options
    kimikimi Member Posts: 44,723 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    AOL is anti gun and pulls this crap about 3 times a year, sometimes it is all emails and sometimes only the forums. I'll get the propeller heads to look into it. (Charter and comcast do it as well)


    Thank you, Sir, I really do appreciate that. I told the young man that I was talking to that this ...well, I used the term a bunch of GD communists a couple of times, which was no doubt recorded, but that's how I feel.
    What's next?
  • Options
    Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,897 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    [:0][:D][:p]
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • Options
    kimikimi Member Posts: 44,723 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Marc1301
    [:0][:D][:p]


    [;)][:D]

    Have a great evening Mark!
    What's next?
  • Options
    discusdaddiscusdad Member Posts: 11,419 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    PROPELLER HEADS bwahahahahahahahahaahhahahquote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    AOL is anti gun and pulls this crap about 3 times a year, sometimes it is all emails and sometimes only the forums. I'll get the propeller heads to look into it. (Charter and comcast do it as well)
  • Options
    armilitearmilite Member Posts: 35,483 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I've had issues with it at times.
  • Options
    Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,372 ******
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by discusdad
    PROPELLER HEADS bwahahahahahahahahaahhahahquote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    AOL is anti gun and pulls this crap about 3 times a year, sometimes it is all emails and sometimes only the forums. I'll get the propeller heads to look into it. (Charter and comcast do it as well)

    my thoughts exactly
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
Sign In or Register to comment.