In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Is this the Democrat Playbook on Judges?
MBK
Member Posts: 2,918 ✭✭✭
The way it is developing this could be a process:
1) Identify all conservative judges or likely Court nominees.
2) Research their High School, College, and work locations.
3) Find women activists in those places.
4) See if there is any chance they know the judge, or could be shown to have been in close proximity to the judge.
5) Build a Case, especially by seeing a therapist and naming the potential future judge/justice. If needed find a SJW therapist to cooperate.
6) Relate some kind of sex morals story to friends.
7) Document enough then set back and wait.
1) Identify all conservative judges or likely Court nominees.
2) Research their High School, College, and work locations.
3) Find women activists in those places.
4) See if there is any chance they know the judge, or could be shown to have been in close proximity to the judge.
5) Build a Case, especially by seeing a therapist and naming the potential future judge/justice. If needed find a SJW therapist to cooperate.
6) Relate some kind of sex morals story to friends.
7) Document enough then set back and wait.
Comments
It started with Roy Moore.
Roy Moore did it to himself.
There is a huge difference between Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh.
If these accusations are true, Kavanaugh half-groped a girl his age 35 years ago.
Roy Moore, on the other hand, groped a girl half his age when he was 35.
There is no moral equivalence in these two men even if the current charges are true.
Brad Steele
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
quote:Originally posted by hobo9650
It started with Roy Moore.
Roy Moore did it to himself.
There is a huge difference between Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh.
If these accusations are true, Kavanaugh half-groped a girl his age 35 years ago.
Roy Moore, on the other hand, groped a girl half his age when he was 35.
There is no moral equivalence in these two men even if the current charges are true.
Show me the proof. You sound like a girly man that takes the side of the female without regard to irrefutable evidence. With people like you the MeToo circus will never leave town.
The day after the election, the accusers disappeared from the airwaves.
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by hobo9650
It started with Roy Moore.
Roy Moore did it to himself.
There is a huge difference between Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh.
If these accusations are true, Kavanaugh half-groped a girl his age 35 years ago.
Roy Moore, on the other hand, groped a girl half his age when he was 35.
There is no moral equivalence in these two men even if the current charges are true.
Show me the proof. You sound like a girly man that takes the side of the female without regard to irrefutable evidence. With people like you the MeToo circus will never leave town.
The day after the election, the accusers disappeared from the airwaves.
https://www.businessinsider.com/roy-moore-former-colleague-common-knowledge-hedated-high-school-girls-2017-11
Just going off of Moore's quotes, P3Nut.
While I have no idea if the specific allegation by the 14 year old is true, the preponderance of the evidence is that Moore, while in his thirties courted teen-agers.
He had his * covered, however, because: (from the link)
When Hannity asked Moore whether he remembered dating teenage girls when he was in his 30s, Moore replied, "Not generally, no."
"I don't remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother," he said. He later pointed to The Post's story and said, "These two young girls actually said their mothers encouraged them to be friends with me."
After a commercial break, Moore became more forceful in his denials of dating teenagers. He told Hannity that doing so "would be out of my customary behavior" and that he "never" would have dated a teen without her mother's permission.
'Not generally, no.' Translation - yes
'These two young girls actually said their mothers encouraged them to be friends with me.' Translation - I had a relationship of some sort with them.
'I don't remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother' Translation - I, in my mid-thirties targeted teen-age girls without a father figure in their lives.
I don't need any Moore proof than that.
The comment was to dispense with any consideration of moral equivalency between Kavanaugh and Moore. There is none. It is abhorrent to make any connection what-so-ever.
Men do not prey upon teen age girls. Moore did. He admits he did. He is not a man. Anyone who believes what he did was acceptable is likewise not a man.
Brad Steele
The very BEST thing that could happen here is somehow Kavanaugh being able to prove his innocence but I don't think it is possible.
I explained the situation to my wife who intentionally avoids current events and she said if that alleged incident screwed this woman up that she should be a real mess. According to her most woman have very likely gone through similar or worse events in HS/college or even a bar and not been damaged for life and needing a therapist.
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
Any thinking person would recognize that this disclosure is only designed to delay the confirmation vote past Oct 1. Once that occurs they have achieved their victory. Then they will press with a new congress for impeachment with an anticipated 4-4 SCOTUS. Republicans need to continue to call the Dems bluff, push for a hearing Monday, if she doesn't show then take the vote. When he's passed out of committee the Dems have more tactics to delay a full senate vote...all of this is scripted and predictable. Our best hope is this obvious obstructionism will motivate Republicans, and independents to deal the Democrats a loss in Nov.
quote:Originally posted by p3skyking
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by hobo9650
It started with Roy Moore.
Roy Moore did it to himself.
There is a huge difference between Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh.
If these accusations are true, Kavanaugh half-groped a girl his age 35 years ago.
Roy Moore, on the other hand, groped a girl half his age when he was 35.
There is no moral equivalence in these two men even if the current charges are true.
Show me the proof. You sound like a girly man that takes the side of the female without regard to irrefutable evidence. With people like you the MeToo circus will never leave town.
The day after the election, the accusers disappeared from the airwaves.
https://www.businessinsider.com/roy-moore-former-colleague-common-knowledge-hedated-high-school-girls-2017-11
Just going off of Moore's quotes, P3Nut.
While I have no idea if the specific allegation by the 14 year old is true, the preponderance of the evidence is that Moore, while in his thirties courted teen-agers.
He had his * covered, however, because: (from the link)
When Hannity asked Moore whether he remembered dating teenage girls when he was in his 30s, Moore replied, "Not generally, no."
"I don't remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother," he said. He later pointed to The Post's story and said, "These two young girls actually said their mothers encouraged them to be friends with me."
After a commercial break, Moore became more forceful in his denials of dating teenagers. He told Hannity that doing so "would be out of my customary behavior" and that he "never" would have dated a teen without her mother's permission.
'Not generally, no.' Translation - yes
'These two young girls actually said their mothers encouraged them to be friends with me.' Translation - I had a relationship of some sort with them.
'I don't remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother' Translation - I, in my mid-thirties targeted teen-age girls without a father figure in their lives.
I don't need any Moore proof than that.
The comment was to dispense with any consideration of moral equivalency between Kavanaugh and Moore. There is none. It is abhorrent to make any connection what-so-ever.
Men do not prey upon teen age girls. Moore did. He admits he did. He is not a man. Anyone who believes what he did was acceptable is likewise not a man.
You're a weirdo. I'm pretty sure you're more interested in McAnus than you are in women. You must have had a Norman Bates relationship with a dominate female.
After reading what you wrote, that's all the proof I need.
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by p3skyking
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by hobo9650
It started with Roy Moore.
Roy Moore did it to himself.
There is a huge difference between Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh.
If these accusations are true, Kavanaugh half-groped a girl his age 35 years ago.
Roy Moore, on the other hand, groped a girl half his age when he was 35.
There is no moral equivalence in these two men even if the current charges are true.
Show me the proof. You sound like a girly man that takes the side of the female without regard to irrefutable evidence. With people like you the MeToo circus will never leave town.
The day after the election, the accusers disappeared from the airwaves.
https://www.businessinsider.com/roy-moore-former-colleague-common-knowledge-hedated-high-school-girls-2017-11
Just going off of Moore's quotes, P3Nut.
While I have no idea if the specific allegation by the 14 year old is true, the preponderance of the evidence is that Moore, while in his thirties courted teen-agers.
He had his * covered, however, because: (from the link)
When Hannity asked Moore whether he remembered dating teenage girls when he was in his 30s, Moore replied, "Not generally, no."
"I don't remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother," he said. He later pointed to The Post's story and said, "These two young girls actually said their mothers encouraged them to be friends with me."
After a commercial break, Moore became more forceful in his denials of dating teenagers. He told Hannity that doing so "would be out of my customary behavior" and that he "never" would have dated a teen without her mother's permission.
'Not generally, no.' Translation - yes
'These two young girls actually said their mothers encouraged them to be friends with me.' Translation - I had a relationship of some sort with them.
'I don't remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother' Translation - I, in my mid-thirties targeted teen-age girls without a father figure in their lives.
I don't need any Moore proof than that.
The comment was to dispense with any consideration of moral equivalency between Kavanaugh and Moore. There is none. It is abhorrent to make any connection what-so-ever.
Men do not prey upon teen age girls. Moore did. He admits he did. He is not a man. Anyone who believes what he did was acceptable is likewise not a man.
You're a weirdo. I'm pretty sure you're more interested in McAnus than you are in women. You must have had a Norman Bates relationship with a dominate female.
After reading what you wrote, that's all the proof I need.
So, what you're saying is, you too prey on little girls. All the proof I need. [:X][:X]
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
One reason is the topic drift. Do you see the original post? That was what this should be about.
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by p3skyking
quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
quote:Originally posted by hobo9650
It started with Roy Moore.
Roy Moore did it to himself.
There is a huge difference between Roy Moore and Brett Kavanaugh.
If these accusations are true, Kavanaugh half-groped a girl his age 35 years ago.
Roy Moore, on the other hand, groped a girl half his age when he was 35.
There is no moral equivalence in these two men even if the current charges are true.
Show me the proof. You sound like a girly man that takes the side of the female without regard to irrefutable evidence. With people like you the MeToo circus will never leave town.
The day after the election, the accusers disappeared from the airwaves.
https://www.businessinsider.com/roy-moore-former-colleague-common-knowledge-hedated-high-school-girls-2017-11
Just going off of Moore's quotes, P3Nut.
While I have no idea if the specific allegation by the 14 year old is true, the preponderance of the evidence is that Moore, while in his thirties courted teen-agers.
He had his * covered, however, because: (from the link)
When Hannity asked Moore whether he remembered dating teenage girls when he was in his 30s, Moore replied, "Not generally, no."
"I don't remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother," he said. He later pointed to The Post's story and said, "These two young girls actually said their mothers encouraged them to be friends with me."
After a commercial break, Moore became more forceful in his denials of dating teenagers. He told Hannity that doing so "would be out of my customary behavior" and that he "never" would have dated a teen without her mother's permission.
'Not generally, no.' Translation - yes
'These two young girls actually said their mothers encouraged them to be friends with me.' Translation - I had a relationship of some sort with them.
'I don't remember dating any girl without the permission of her mother' Translation - I, in my mid-thirties targeted teen-age girls without a father figure in their lives.
I don't need any Moore proof than that.
The comment was to dispense with any consideration of moral equivalency between Kavanaugh and Moore. There is none. It is abhorrent to make any connection what-so-ever.
Men do not prey upon teen age girls. Moore did. He admits he did. He is not a man. Anyone who believes what he did was acceptable is likewise not a man.
You're a weirdo. I'm pretty sure you're more interested in McAnus than you are in women. You must have had a Norman Bates relationship with a dominate female.
After reading what you wrote, that's all the proof I need.
What you think of me has little to do with Roy Moore, has little to do with Brett Kavanaugh and has little to do with the Democrat playbook. Roy Moore, through his actions, made this kind of thing possible because he confirmed that most of the allegations were true.
Your homo-erotic predilections do not change that fact.
Brad Steele
There are two reasons I do not come here or post here now, after all those years.
One reason is the topic drift. Do you see the original post? That was what this should be about.
I'm sorta failing to see how you kept it on topic.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
The way it is developing this could be a process:
1) Identify all conservative judges or likely Court nominees.
2) Research their High School, College, and work locations.
3) Find women activists in those places.
4) See if there is any chance they know the judge, or could be shown to have been in close proximity to the judge.
5) Build a Case, especially by seeing a therapist and naming the potential future judge/justice. If needed find a SJW therapist to cooperate.
6) Relate some kind of sex morals story to friends.
7) Document enough then set back and wait.
If these DEMOCRATs can't comply with #2 - 5, they will more than likely pay someone to fabricate such a narrative. This is who these people are and they have a complicit corrupt media to spread the lies.
Look at the Trump dossier if you doubt me.
I hope decent people bail on the Democrats in the millions
I?m seriously considering bailing on the Republicans. What they are doing here is typical of Republican behavior for at least the last fifty years. They know for a certainty what the Democrat plan is but they stand aside and let it happen. I?m past being disgusted with the Republican Party, now I?m just tired of being disgusted.
I hope decent people bail on the Democrats in the millions
I doubt you could find "one".
What you think of me has little to do with Roy Moore, has little to do with Brett Kavanaugh and has little to do with the Democrat playbook. Roy Moore, through his actions, made this kind of thing possible because he confirmed that most of the allegations were true.
Roy Moore certainly shot himself in the foot. If nothing else he didn't help himself. It's a tough thing to contend with when the media and a certain segment has set themselves to destroy a man. I guess the power of that position makes it worth it, I'll never be motivated towards that end.
quote:Originally posted by mogley98
I hope decent people bail on the Democrats in the millions
I?m seriously considering bailing on the Republicans. What they are doing here is typical of Republican behavior for at least the last fifty years. They know for a certainty what the Democrat plan is but they stand aside and let it happen. I?m past being disgusted with the Republican Party, now I?m just tired of being disgusted.
+1 We are imprisoned by the alternative....
quote:Originally posted by mogley98
I hope decent people bail on the Democrats in the millions
I?m seriously considering bailing on the Republicans. What they are doing here is typical of Republican behavior for at least the last fifty years. They know for a certainty what the Democrat plan is but they stand aside and let it happen. I?m past being disgusted with the Republican Party, now I?m just tired of being disgusted.
+1
Yes
When?
35 years ago
Can you prove it?
No
Can anyone corroborate it?
No
Can we interview you?
No
Will you testify?
No
Can we ?
No
Will ?
No
...
...
I ju?
No.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain