In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

An Eye for an eye......literally

Rack OpsRack Ops Member Posts: 18,596 ✭✭✭
edited March 2015 in General Discussion
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/05/eye-for-an-eye-iran-blinds-man-who-carried-out-acid-attack

In a literal application of the sharia law of an eye for an eye, an Iranian man convicted of blinding another man in an acid attack has been blinded in one eye, marking the first time Iran has carried out such a punishment.

The convicted acid attacker, who has not been identified, was rendered unconscious in Rajai-Shahr prison in the city of Karaj on Tuesday as medics gouged out his left eye, according to the state-owned Hamshahri newspaper.

Mahmood Amiry-Moghaddam, from Iran Human Rights (IHR), an independent NGO based in Norway, condemned the blinding as barbaric. "Medical staff who cooperate with the Iranian authorities in this act have broken the Hippocratic oath and cannot call themselves doctors," he said.

The man had been found guilty of throwing acid in the face of his unnamed victim five years ago in the city of Qom, blinding and disfiguring him for life. He was subsequently sentenced to be blinded in both eyes, paying a fine and 10 years imprisonment.

Although the convict was sentenced to lose sight in both eyes on Tuesday, the victim - who, under Iranian law, has the final say in the punishment - decided at the last minute to postpone the blinding of his right eye for six months. The attacker will be able to plead with the plaintiff to spare him from being blinded fully.

Acid attacks have been rife in Iran in recent years, usually driven by family feuds. Hamshahri reported that the man in this case had been hired by the relatives of his victim's wife to take revenge on their behalf. It was not clear if he had carried out the attack for financial gain or whether he was related to the wife's family.

Iranian officials, worried about the increase in the rate of acid attacks, have endorsed retribution, but human rights activists condemn it as inhumane.

Islam's Sharia law allows for qisas (retribution) but it also advises clemency. Under Iranian law, victims or their families have the final say in such cases and can halt the punishment at any time.
Advertisement

Other acid attackers have also been sentenced to be blinded in Iran, but this is the first known case where the punishment has been carried out. In most previous cases doctors had refused to cooperate with the officials.

Raha Bahreini, a researcher with Amnesty International's Iran team, said that punishing someone by deliberately blinding them is "an unspeakably cruel and shocking act".

She told the Guardian: "Blinding is totally prohibited under international law, along with stoning, flogging, amputation and other forms of corporal punishment provided in Iran's Islamic penal code and must not be carried out under any circumstances."

Instead of meting out such macabre punishments, Bahreini said Iranian authorities "should raise awareness about violence including root causes, ensure that perpetrators of acid attacks are punished with appropriate and proportionate penalties consistent with international human rights norms, and survivors are provided with effective remedies, including compensation and psychosocial and medical rehabilitation."

Another man, identified only as Hamid, was also scheduled to be blinded in Karaj on Tuesday, but his punishment was postponed at the request of his victim, Davoud Roshanaei.

"Hamid was about to be rendered unconscious on the bed when his father entered the room and asked me for more time," said Roshanaei, who has been disfigured and lost sight in one eye as the result of the assault. "I gave them two more months to provide me with compensation for my treatment."

In a highly publicised case in 2011, Ameneh Bahrami, a victim of an acid attack, received international praise after pardoning her attacker hours before surgeons prepared to blind the man with acid. Bahrami was disfigured and blinded in both eyes because she had repeatedly spurned her attacker's offer for marriage.

Last year, a spate of acid attacks on young women in Iran's top tourist destination, Isfahan, caused national horror and outrage. Activists claimed that unlike other cases across the country, victims in Isfahan had been targeted by hardliners for wearing clothes deemed inappropriate. The authorities have vehemently denied this charge.

Comments

  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Such a wonderful society they dwell in. Not much different than the dark ages we saw 600 years ago. And to think Obama wants to GIVE them the ability to make and atomic bomb. That ought to end well.....
  • dreherdreher Member Posts: 8,892 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It is at least possible Iran with a nuke could have a good ending. If the Iranians would get their panties all bunched up over one of their Arab neighbors and nuke them instead Israel. Then Israel would nuke Iran and half of the Middle East would be gone. Kind of sounds like a happy ending to me!![:D]
  • Ditch-RunnerDitch-Runner Member Posts: 25,388 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I would bet if we were allowed to decide what happens to the person or people who do harm to us or our family and found guilty . the crime rate would go down
  • 1BigGuy1BigGuy Member Posts: 4,033 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The more I learn about islam, them more horrified I become. [V]
  • AzAfshinAzAfshin Member Posts: 2,985 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think they were too lenient on him. They should have kept him awake and poured acid on his face to make the punishment truly fit the crime.

    Human rights? What about victim rights? Stop whining about punishing psychopaths. What are you liberals?
  • Rack OpsRack Ops Member Posts: 18,596 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It's a pretty horrific punishment, no doubt.


    They should have just shot him.
  • Dads3040Dads3040 Member Posts: 13,552 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    But remember, it is only the extremists that pervert the Beauty of Islam that would ever do such a thing.

    Not sure what to make of the officials of a country acting like extremsits with little knowledge that the year is not 735 AD.

    Maybe CJ can negotiate them into the modern era when he works out the last kinks in the nuclear agreement he is knobbing them off over.
  • reloader44magreloader44mag Member Posts: 18,783 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Rack Ops
    It's a pretty horrific punishment, no doubt.


    They should have just shot him.
    +1
  • kimikimi Member Posts: 44,719 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    So these folks are becoming more progressive after all.
    What's next?
  • shilowarshilowar Member Posts: 38,811 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Sounds good to me. The vic gets some satisfaction, and the offender has an opportunity to work out a civil arrangment to avoid losing his other eye.
  • dav1965dav1965 Member Posts: 26,540 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I also believe in a eye for a eye. If he did that to your kid or grand kid would you let him walk? I think prison is a waste of time. Third offense should be death.
Sign In or Register to comment.