In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

So...help me out here...

BlairweescotBlairweescot Member Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited May 2009 in General Discussion
I saw a thread here Mon or Tues, that I thought was "buy back", so I ignored it

Well...it was "Buy Black". So. Help me out here.

To start with, I hope I have called enough of the dumb-* racists (redundant) around here funny names often enough to get my point across- I don't care for racism.

This Buy Black thing is a "experiment" according to the papers. Folks literally buying from black merchants and black owned/operated locations if possible. I have this part straight correct?

In other words, patronizing a shop by choice because of the color of somebody's skin, when the choice can be made. To put it another way, because of the ethnic background or race that establishment is "perceived to be". Um. Yeah... Whatthebloddyfingbluebabyjesusonahoppeduphockeystick is fing going ON?

This is racism. The ideal behind it doesn't matter. Discriminating against people because they are not of the race you care to help out is RACISM by definition, and it is also exclusing people of the race you don't care to help out because of their race.

This is no different than a cracker refusing to stop a gas station run by a black guy, becasue the cracker doesn't like to help out blacks, and instead will go out of his way if he has a choice to patronize a gas station run by another cracker

And the media will not call this Buy Black thing a racist event

I just want to make sure I understand this all before I pop a clot in my brain and die. I'd hate to look at God and say "what the bleen" without knowing the whole story

Comments

  • 7RiverMan77RiverMan7 Member Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    "Whatthebloddyfingbluebabyjesusonahoppeduphockeystick is fing going ON?"





    ROFLMAO

    [:D][:D][:D]
  • Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Blairweescot
    I saw a thread here Mon or Tues, that I thought was "buy back", so I ignored it

    Well...it was "Buy Black". So. Help me out here.

    To start with, I hope I have called enough of the dumb-* racists (redundant) around here funny names often enough to get my point across- I don't care for racism.

    This Buy Black thing is a "experiment" according to the papers. Folks literally buying from black merchants and black owned/operated locations if possible. I have this part straight correct?

    In other words, patronizing a shop by choice because of the color of somebody's skin, when the choice can be made. To put it another way, because of the ethnic background or race that establishment is "perceived to be". Um. Yeah... Whatthebloddyfingbluebabyjesusonahoppeduphockeystick is fing going ON?

    This is racism. The ideal behind it doesn't matter. Discriminating against people because they are not of the race you care to help out is RACISM by definition, and it is also exclusing people of the race you don't care to help out because of their race.

    This is no different than a cracker refusing to stop a gas station run by a black guy, becasue the cracker doesn't like to help out blacks, and instead will go out of his way if he has a choice to patronize a gas station run by another cracker

    And the media will not call this Buy Black thing a racist event
    I just want to make sure I understand this all before I pop a clot in my brain and die. I'd hate to look at God and say "what the bleen" without knowing the whole story



    I would say you have it correct.
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • asphalt cowboyasphalt cowboy Member Posts: 8,904 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    As weird, outlandish or just plain dumbassfingtupid as it seems, that's the way some people? are wired. Some times I wonder if they aren't wired just a bit to tight.
  • bamafanbamafan Member Posts: 4,011 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by 7RiverMan7
    "Whatthebloddyfingbluebabyjesusonahoppeduphockeystick is fing going ON?"





    ROFLMAO

    [:D][:D][:D]



    Yeah, took me a second look (or three) to understand this one.

    ROFLMAO!!!!!
  • BlairweescotBlairweescot Member Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    OK

    So I also read it was at least in part because some empowered dummy has decided that its not right that after 400 years, they are not in positions of X Y or Z, and they are entitled to being store owners, etc

    Entitled to that, mind you.

    Who has been talking to these folks? It's more than the Sharptons and the Farrakhans. How have these (hopefully) otherwise intelligent people been so fully convinced of their Divine mantle of Victimhood and Entitlement?

    Are there Two Americas? The one I was taught about, in which you make your own future, and the other America, in which the trials of your Anscestors make you entitled to things?

    Last system I heard about that used the events of your Ancestors to determine what you get now was the Feudal System.

    All the lawyers and the other carrion beats of opportunity need to be force-marched into the sea, right now
  • dav1965dav1965 Member Posts: 26,540 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ever since Sep 11 i try not to get gas from Arab stores. Its not right to do this its just that i cant see any money possibly going to terorrist. Just my 2 cents. Hell just cause they work there dont mean they on it.
  • Survivalist86Survivalist86 Member Posts: 3,105
    edited November -1
    Not to toss kerosine on the fire...but I seem to recall a "Buy Christian" only movement. Opinions on that?[:D]
  • mateomasfeomateomasfeo Member Posts: 27,143
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Blairweescot

    All the lawyers and the other carrion beats of opportunity need to be force-marched into the sea, right now


    Anytime you feel bad enough, bring it.

    I agreed with you until that uniformed remark. I fight in the trenches every day for the rights afforded by the Constitution of the U.S.

    Beasts of opportunity. Hope you never need one of us "Beasts of Opportunity."

    [xx(]
  • BlairweescotBlairweescot Member Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by mateomasfeo
    quote:Originally posted by Blairweescot

    All the lawyers and the other carrion beats of opportunity need to be force-marched into the sea, right now


    Anytime you feel bad enough, bring it.

    I agreed with you until that uniformed remark. I fight in the trenches every day for the rights afforded by the Constitution of the U.S.

    Beasts of opportunity. Hope you never need one of us "Beasts of Opportunity."

    [xx(]








    So is this where we prove our manhood by posturing, right? I'd think a lawyer would know better

    You can cool your baby jets any time you like. Or not. We both know that frivolous litigation is the bane of existence and also is what seems to spread these BS entitlement issues, so don't defend it to me, OK tough guy?
  • mateomasfeomateomasfeo Member Posts: 27,143
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Blairweescot
    quote:Originally posted by mateomasfeo
    quote:Originally posted by Blairweescot

    All the lawyers and the other carrion beats of opportunity need to be force-marched into the sea, right now


    Anytime you feel bad enough, bring it.

    I agreed with you until that uninformed remark. I fight in the trenches every day for the rights afforded by the Constitution of the U.S.

    Beasts of opportunity. Hope you never need one of us "Beasts of Opportunity."

    [xx(]








    So is this where we prove our manhood by posturing, right? I'd think a lawyer would know better

    You can cool your baby jets any time you like. Or not. We both know that frivolous litigation is the bane of existence and also is what seems to spread these BS entitlement issues, so don't defend it to me, OK tough guy?


    More uniformed BS. Frivoulous lawsuits are the exception, not the rule, but I'm sure you know that from all your trial experience. Also, a lot of lawyers do not practice in the civil arena. Wanna kill them too?

    Your comment on lawyers shows the EXACT prejudicial mindset you rue in your original post.

    By the way, I choose "or not."
  • GuvamintCheeseGuvamintCheese Member Posts: 38,932
    edited November -1
    Sounds like he was on the bad end of a judgement, shoulda had a better lawyer.
  • mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Aw gee golly don't tell me we can't tell Lawyer jokes I dont want to upset Manefesto guy but Oh well

    This attorney walks into a bar see and then
    he talks to this lady who is wearing a lamp shade see
    and ......

    Never mind

    Gee guys Not all lawyers are bad, not all crackers are bad and not all

    Never mind
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • mateomasfeomateomasfeo Member Posts: 27,143
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by mogley98
    Aw gee golly don't tell me we can't tell Lawyer jokes I dont want to upset Manefesto guy but Oh well

    This attorney walks into a bar see and then
    he talks to this lady who is wearing a lamp shade see
    and ......

    Never mind

    Gee guys Not all lawyers are bad, not all crackers are bad and not all

    Never mind




    Quit speaking logically.

    By the way, I like lawyer jokes. Don't like threats or suggestions of murder.


    How are a lawyer and a sperm cell similar?

    They both have a 1-in-a-million chance of becoming a human being...
  • hrbiehrbie Member Posts: 521 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If you dont care for racism then why did you refer to a white person as a "craker"?

    Some may take offense to that.
  • dave40glockdave40glock Member Posts: 448 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dav1965
    Ever since Sep 11 i try not to get gas from Arab stores. Its not right to do this its just that i cant see any money possibly going to terorrist. Just my 2 cents. Hell just cause they work there dont mean they on it.
    I DONT LIKE HOW GAS IS ONE PRICE 2.OO A GALLON IF YOUR USING CASH AND ANOTHER PRICE 2.25 A GALLON IF YOUR USING CREDIT ITS LIKE YOUR BEING FORCED TO USE CASH BECAUSE THEY DONT HAVE TO PAY TAXES ON THE MONEY,WHICH MEAN THEY CAN SEND IT BACK HOME FOR WHAT EVER THEY USE IT FOR FAMILY AND FRIENDS,OR THE NEXT TERORRIST ATTACK.AT LEAST THATS HOW SEE IT
  • BlairweescotBlairweescot Member Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by mateomasfeo


    More uniformed BS. Frivoulous lawsuits are the exception, not the rule, but I'm sure you know that from all your trial experience. Also, a lot of lawyers do not practice in the civil arena. Wanna kill them too?

    Your comment on lawyers shows the EXACT prejudicial mindset you rue in your original post.

    By the way, I choose "or not."



    Hmmph. You're pretty emotional for a lawyer. I hope you're not this easily riled when trying to make a point while practicing. I'd agree with your hypothesis about prejudice, if I had happened to mention your race. I know its tough, but try to stay focused. Apparently you have never heard of the term 'exaggeration' before. Or are you really up in arms because I want to massacre lawyers and advocate their murder. I bloody well doubt that's your take on it. Grow up

    Since I seem to have deeply offended, and my slur against lawyers is such an affront, there's no harm left in asking you the difference between a lawyer and a golf ball.

    Give up? One is an object you should whack with a metal club. The other belongs in a hole or at the bottom of a pond. Since you're so superior, you can figure out which is which!
  • BlairweescotBlairweescot Member Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by hrbie
    If you dont care for racism then why did you refer to a white person as a "craker"?

    Some may take offense to that.


    It's called an "illustration". I "illustrated" my point by using the term "cracker". The "illustration" highlights my point, and makes the point more descriptive.

    The "illustration" is a useful tool, because it "illustrates" that "cracker's" mindset.
  • BlairweescotBlairweescot Member Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by cartod
    Sounds like he was on the bad end of a judgement, shoulda had a better lawyer.


    Sounds like you're making guesses [;)]
  • lindalecowboylindalecowboy Member Posts: 1,909 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm certainly not your typical red neck racist but I've always been a bit puzzled by the very existence of the UNITED NEGRO COLLECT FUND???? I just find it a bit funny that if there WAS a UNITED WHITE BOY COLLEGE FUND, I can name a few rather busy activists that would be on the first bus of protesters to arrive.

    I have no problem with folks patronizing whomever they want, for whatever reason they want, I call it VOTING with your dollars. Another way to say, I ENDORSE this company's position on things.........

    I guess I just smile and keep on smiling that the words racism don't seem to work in both directions, like democratic congressman caught with kiddie porn gets NOTHING and a GOP senator caught winking at a young page gets run out of Washington.......??/

    Arsenio Hall used to say, "that's the kind of stuff that just makes you want to go, h-m-m-m-m-m-m-m".
  • RtWngExtrmstRtWngExtrmst Member Posts: 7,456
    edited November -1
    A guy walked into a bar and cried out "all lawyers are scum bags!!"

    A man down at the end said "that ain't right. you can't paint everybody with the same brush. it's just wrong."

    The guy said " What, are you a lawyer?"

    "No, I'm a scum bag."
  • BlairweescotBlairweescot Member Posts: 2,014 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well, patronizing whoever you want is fine and that's how it should be, but there's something else here, the way the "Buy Black" experiment is presented, it is not simply to buy from who they choose to. It is because those people are essentially entitled to something, while other people are not. Thus giving one group a thing based on race while denying another group based on race. It's all very innocent until you look at the other side of the coin

    If they are patronizing because of race, they are also avoiding because of race. It's the exclusionary aspect, the negative connotation that the other races that are represented by shopkeepers are not to be dealt with except by necessity that doesn't sit well with me. Well, that plus the entitlement thing
  • mateomasfeomateomasfeo Member Posts: 27,143
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Blairweescot


    You're pretty emotional for a lawyer. I hope you're not this easily riled when trying to make a point while practicing. I'd agree with your hypothesis about prejudice, if I had happened to mention your race. I know its tough, but try to stay focused. Apparently you have never heard of the term 'exaggeration' before. Or are you really up in arms because I want to massacre lawyers and advocate their murder. I bloody well doubt that's your take on it. Grow up

    Since I seem to have deeply offended, and my slur against lawyers is such an affront, there's no harm left in asking you the difference between a lawyer and a golf ball.

    Give up? One is an object you should whack with a metal club. The other belongs in a hole or at the bottom of a pond. Since you're so superior, you can figure out which is which!



    Me upset? Sounds like you're making guesses...[;)] Just because I take issue with a comment you make does not mean I am upset. You don't have that power. Seems you are the one on the rant! Re-read the posts, or have someone read them to you.
  • GuvamintCheeseGuvamintCheese Member Posts: 38,932
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Blairweescot
    quote:Originally posted by cartod
    Sounds like he was on the bad end of a judgement, shoulda had a better lawyer.


    Sounds like you're making guesses [;)]

    Hmmph. You're pretty emotional for a lawyer. I hope you're not this easily riled when trying to make a point while practicing. I'd agree with your hypothesis about prejudice, if I had happened to mention your race. I know its tough, but try to stay focused. Apparently you have never heard of the term 'exaggeration' before. Or are you really up in arms because I want to massacre lawyers and advocate their murder. I bloody well doubt that's your take on it. Grow up

    Who is guessing? you're a dead giveaway.
  • MosinNagantDiscipleMosinNagantDisciple Member Posts: 2,612
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dave40glock
    quote:Originally posted by dav1965
    Ever since Sep 11 i try not to get gas from Arab stores. Its not right to do this its just that i cant see any money possibly going to terorrist. Just my 2 cents. Hell just cause they work there dont mean they on it.
    I DONT LIKE HOW GAS IS ONE PRICE 2.OO A GALLON IF YOUR USING CASH AND ANOTHER PRICE 2.25 A GALLON IF YOUR USING CREDIT ITS LIKE YOUR BEING FORCED TO USE CASH BECAUSE THEY DONT HAVE TO PAY TAXES ON THE MONEY,WHICH MEAN THEY CAN SEND IT BACK HOME FOR WHAT EVER THEY USE IT FOR FAMILY AND FRIENDS,OR THE NEXT TERORRIST ATTACK.AT LEAST THATS HOW SEE IT


    Credit companies charge store owners a certain percentage on each purchase for the priviledge of having a swipe machine. So the store owner makes less money if you pay by credit card instead of with cash. That's why they have two prices... it has nothing to do with taxes.
  • SpartacusSpartacus Member Posts: 14,415
    edited November -1
    this lawyer bashing is getting interesting! [;)]
    but, about racism, descrimination and negro college fund...
    I was turned down by the first medical school i applied to because i'm white.
    the gal in admissions told me I was fully qualified but they had to have another minority in that class to be eligible for some kind of federal grant money.
    she even asked me if i wanted to change the application and check "hispanic" instead of "caucasion" [:0]
    I gues that's descrimination, right?
  • 11b6r11b6r Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Discrimination is when I do, or refrain from doing, something solely on the basis of race, sex, religion, national origin, etc. What was being described in the original post is discriminatory behavior.

    The OLD test to determine if something is fair- reverse the situation 180 degrees. If it seems unfair from one view, it is from the other.

    As far as attorneys- you don't need one, until you need one BAD.

    Know the difference between an attorney and a large pizza? A large pizza can feed a family of 4......
  • 204targetman204targetman Member Posts: 3,493
    edited November -1
    A lawyer a Jew and a Hindu holy man knock on a farmers door and ask if they can spend the night. The farmer says sure but only two can stay in the house and the other has to sleep in the barn. The jew says I'll sleep in the barn. A few minutes later there is a knock on the door and the jew says I cant sleep under the same roof as pigs. So the hindu holy many says he will sleep in the barn. A few minutes later there is a knock on the door. The hindu holy man says he cant sleep under the same roof with cows. The lawyer then says he will sleep in the barn. A few minutes later there is a knock on the door. Its the cow and the pigs.........

    I always loved it when Harold from the statler brothers would tell this joke....
  • montanajoemontanajoe Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 59,194 ******
    edited November -1
    SEE, this is what happened because the native american indians did not regulate imigration. Good golly. lmao
  • justusnospamjustusnospam Member Posts: 579 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    the only reason lawyers exist is because of a mentality that allows one to shed doubt on a document such as the constitution. A case in point is the right to keep and bear arms.

    Without a doubt in my mind, this allows me to do so. But some "expletive deleted" individual sees an opportunity to trash said document and raise doubts on 1700's verbage to the point of trying to convince the general populace that an individual was never granted said right, only a militia.

    I say damn all lawyers except those that fight to UPHOLD the constitution, rather than tear it asunder.

    The time is coming for a militia to once again form to provide security to our populace and the REPUBLIC that was formed as the very foundation of this country.

    Where are you in this argument?
Sign In or Register to comment.