In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Global Warmng Doomer Trying to BS Congress
m88.358win
Member Posts: 7,269 ✭✭✭
Listen to the global warming doomer dance around Senator Vitter's question on where's the science data behind their claims. The doomer's answer is like well, you see, global warming is actually playing hide-and-go-seek I tell you. Its there even though its not there.
It's also quite telling that the committee chair (oh btw chaired by Barbara Boxer) didn't like the fact that Senator Vitter displayed several charts which contradict the global warming doomers narratives. These people are a scam, and a joke.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoCUe-BvX5I
It's also quite telling that the committee chair (oh btw chaired by Barbara Boxer) didn't like the fact that Senator Vitter displayed several charts which contradict the global warming doomers narratives. These people are a scam, and a joke.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hoCUe-BvX5I
Comments
I suppose calling any possibility of environmental changes hog wash is as stupid as assuming the increase in mercury in fish is a hoax also.
I have no doubt that WE human activity has damaged the water quality why not the air?
Does LA smog happen to just be an environmental event that would have happened regardless of mans contribution?
The effect of increases in skin cancer could be due to more radiation but I wouldn't rule out a thinning of the atmospheric conditions that protected us either.
anyone ever remember tornados in april ?, how about the number of tornados and hurricanes that been increasing every year
global warming is about taxes nothing more, they want to tax the air we breath, they are already trying to tax cow farts, cremations, etc
Typical environmentalist, totally full of crap, and a brain fogged by dope. No facts whatsoever from that pos. There should be open season on environmentalists.
Ohh so true. As many tags as you want for free.
While many folks claim global warming to be a complete ruse, there is certainly some science to examine.
I suppose calling any possibility of environmental changes hog wash is as stupid as assuming the increase in mercury in fish is a hoax also.
I have no doubt that WE human activity has damaged the water quality why not the air?
Does LA smog happen to just be an environmental event that would have happened regardless of mans contribution?
The effect of increases in skin cancer could be due to more radiation but I wouldn't rule out a thinning of the atmospheric conditions that protected us either.
+1
Anyone can hire a scientist these days and pay them to say whatever benefits them. As intelligent people, we have to keep an open mind and examine the facts for ourselves. So far I have only come to one conclusion, things are definitely changing. Haven't heard any concrete arguments (not saying there aren't any, just haven't really searched out for one) for or against this change being significantly man made.
Anthropogenic global warming is a ruse used for wealth redistribution and control and we should do everything we can to derail it.
Pollution is real and we can do something about it.
Anthropogenic global warming is a ruse used for wealth redistribution and control and we should do everything we can to derail it.
BINGO!!!!!!
However the environment needs help from pollution.
The planet has been warming since the end of the last ice age. It will continue to warm until the start of the NEXT ice age. With or without people.... taxes
fixed it [:D]
we have had debates here before about human effect on this planet, in my opinion only a fool would not believe we are having an impact on this planet, billions of people that's way past the amount the planet can support {adding 250,00 a day}
add turning the earth inside out for fossil fuels, simple thing like the amount of concrete we add taking away from natural growth, oil spills, nuclear testing {I believe that's where our ozone layer went}, the list goes on and on
impact YES, global warming ? not so much, in the end we are mere cockroaches and the planet will win
Natural amounts of carbon dioxide have varied from 180 to 300 parts per million (ppm), measured from ice cores. Today's levels are around 400 ppm. That's 40% more than the highest natural levels over the past 800,000 years.
We can tell that the additional co2 in the atmosphere comes mainly from coal and oil because the chemical composition of the co2 contains a unique fingerprint.
It has not been proven that increases in CO2 cause global warming.
While many folks claim global warming to be a complete ruse, there is certainly some science to examine.
I suppose calling any possibility of environmental changes hog wash is as stupid as assuming the increase in mercury in fish is a hoax also.
I have no doubt that WE human activity has damaged the water quality why not the air?
Does LA smog happen to just be an environmental event that would have happened regardless of mans contribution?
The effect of increases in skin cancer could be due to more radiation but I wouldn't rule out a thinning of the atmospheric conditions that protected us either.
Could this link have anything to do with both cancer and the atmosphere?
When we burn fossil fuels such as coal or petroleum, we release carbon dioxide.
Natural amounts of carbon dioxide have varied from 180 to 300 parts per million (ppm), measured from ice cores. Today's levels are around 400 ppm. That's 40% more than the highest natural levels over the past 800,000 years.
We can tell that the additional co2 in the atmosphere comes mainly from coal and oil because the chemical composition of the co2 contains a unique fingerprint.
It has not been proven that increases in CO2 cause global warming.
Yes, burning fossil fuels releases CO2, Where did that CO2 come from???? (Hint the plants and animals that make up the fossil fuels got it out of the atmosphere...... So at some point it was already there... )
quote:Originally posted by mogley98
While many folks claim global warming to be a complete ruse, there is certainly some science to examine.
I suppose calling any possibility of environmental changes hog wash is as stupid as assuming the increase in mercury in fish is a hoax also.
I have no doubt that WE human activity has damaged the water quality why not the air?
Does LA smog happen to just be an environmental event that would have happened regardless of mans contribution?
The effect of increases in skin cancer could be due to more radiation but I wouldn't rule out a thinning of the atmospheric conditions that protected us either.
Could this link have anything to do with both cancer and the atmosphere?
wow, that's amazing I had no idea we {the world} set off so many nuclear bombs