In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
FAL v. AR10 v. M1A accuracy??
Boomerang
Member Posts: 4,513
1. What kind of accuracy can one expect from these rifles?
2. What is the best accuracy one can hope to get out of these rifles without spending a fortune to modify?
Recommendations welcome.
2. What is the best accuracy one can hope to get out of these rifles without spending a fortune to modify?
Recommendations welcome.
Comments
Each can be modified to different extents depending on the depth of your pocketbook and that would skew the answer.[:)]
I think it's about half the rifle and about half me, so in fairness without adding a ton of money to them it is my opinion they are 1 moa guns at best. (from the factory)
What do you actually plan to do with the rifle? Hunt? Plink? SHTF? Target or match shooting? If you want a target or match rifle then you need to purchase the M1A, the sights alone are superior to virtually any other .30 caliber semi auto (excepting the M1 Garand of course). You'll need a lot of time to get a FAL to shoot as accurately as an M1A will shoot right out of the box and National Match M1As are well ahead of anything a FAL can be made to do if keeping money in your wallet is a concern.
agreed, as far as stock rifles go, the m1a is going to have way better sights and thus more accurate to the shooter I would bet.
1. AR10
2. M1A
3. FAL, Saiga 308, PTR
AR10 is strictly a commercial rifle: can be as dependable and accurate as you can afford
M1-A is basically a commercial do-over of a battle rifle: same expectations as AR10 but more variables due to bedding and trigger
Since the M-14 is the only one of the three that I've personally fired, I'm biased toward the M1-A. The AR10 probably has the best "off the shelf" chance for best accuracy.
Realistically, any of the 3 can probably shoot better than the average shooter can hold.
I have fired an M1A. I have owned an FAL for nearly 3 decades. Don't feel the need to swap the latter for the former. Just me.
Too old to live...too young to die...
Like other have said the FAL is a battle rifle and not much can be done to make it more accurate.
The M1A can be modified to shoot very accurately. Even in its "Battle" rifle mode with a good fitting stock its a good shooter.
The AR-10 is very accurate and with a good barrel will really shoot.
I don't have a FAL but I have shoot them. I do have a M1A match rifle and I have a AR-10. The AR-10 is a bit more accurate with the same ammo used in both.
It's okay, I didn't say the exact same thing (almost an hour earlier)...but, no worries!
[}:)]
Hey now, imitation is the highest form of flattery.[;)]
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Both box-stock.
My M1A will put the FAL to shame with the same hand loads, under 2moa. but to be fair, I have not wrung out the FAL like I have the Springfield.
I knew the FAL was not known for accuracy when I bought it, Mine is about a 3moa rifle. I just wanted one.
As others have said, sights on the FAL are crap compared to the M1A.