In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Security Checks to Increase Worldwide Now

serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭
edited May 2017 in General Discussion
After the latest terrorist attack in The United Kingdom The Nation States along with The G-7 are going to increase and canvas all sports and entertainment gatherings. In other words like The TSA at airports with bio-metric data! All to be collected on each and every attendee!Just watch!

Those booths with interrogation technological advances will be used on any suspects they feel are suspicious,get ready it's coming.

serf

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-security-manchester-globalven-idUSKBN18J0N5?il=0

Countries from the United States to Japan and Singapore are considering tightening security ahead of major theater and sports events following a suicide bomb attack in Britain that killed at least 22 people.

Prime Minister Theresa May called an emergency meeting with intelligence chiefs on the deadliest militant assault in the country since four British Muslims killed 52 people in suicide bombings on London's transport system in July 2005.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security said it was closely monitoring Monday's attack, at the end of a concert by U.S. singer Ariana Grande in Manchester, and that the U.S. public may experience increased security at public events.

ttps://www.elsevier.com/connect/what-are-your-rights-at-airport-screenings-and-checkpoints

The border is now at any sport,political,musical,etc.. soon! just watch especially in The U.K.

The Supreme Court has gone further to rule that not only is the expectation of privacy less at the international border than within the United States, but that the Fourth Amendment balance between the interests of the government and the privacy right of the individual leans in favor of the government at the border (Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 1973

Comments

  • fideaufideau Member Posts: 11,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Always a clamp down after these things. After a short time, it will begin to fall off until the next attack. You can't stop everything, especially when they are willing to die to kill others. You may prevent some if you are as ruthless as the killers. But we don't do that, do we?
  • Tech141Tech141 Member Posts: 3,787 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I might be entering 'tin foil hat' property with this, but I would like to add -

    If the civilized governments of the Earth wanted ISIS gone, they would be GONE.

    We KNOW where they are, we know how to kill them, but we do NOT do it. Sure, we take them out in ones and twos, but nothing serious. The Government WANTS them to exist and do the evil they do.

    This is the same as the gang problem in every major city on the US. The Government KNOWS who the gangbangers are, and where they live/hunt. If the Government wanted them gone, they would be gone.

    We need to start seriously holding the Government (State/Local/Federal) accountable for NOT doing there job and removing these parasites from the face of the Earth.

    Seriously, if the Government won't do the job, then the citizens are going to have to step up and do it for them.
  • spasmcreekspasmcreek Member Posts: 37,717 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    hiding and waiting is a losing game...go after them wholesale and twice as vicious ..wholesale deportations is the only way to get the "moderates" attention and have them start giving up the bad ones of their own ...kill the bad ones without hesitation...fight to WIN ...or...you will LOSE
  • mag00mag00 Member Posts: 4,719 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Tech141
    I might be entering 'tin foil hat' property with this, but I would like to add -

    If the civilized governments of the Earth wanted ISIS gone, they would be GONE.

    We KNOW where they are, we know how to kill them, but we do NOT do it. Sure, we take them out in ones and twos, but nothing serious. The Government WANTS them to exist and do the evil they do.

    This is the same as the gang problem in every major city on the US. The Government KNOWS who the gangbangers are, and where they live/hunt. If the Government wanted them gone, they would be gone.

    We need to start seriously holding the Government (State/Local/Federal) accountable for NOT doing there job and removing these parasites from the face of the Earth.

    Seriously, if the Government won't do the job, then the citizens are going to have to step up and do it for them.
    .

    That's happening in the filipines and working
  • fideaufideau Member Posts: 11,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    We are all saying the same thing. But it will not happen.
    If you outlaw gangs for instance, round them up, kill them if they resist, life in prison for being a member, or selling drugs, you can eliminate gangs. BUT, lawyers, ACLU, Libturd judges, Dimocrap lawmakers, the crap news media, etc., will be up in arms screaming to high heaven about their "rights". "Rights" to be criminals, killers, and drug dealers I guess, until millions of dollars and years of investigations might put them in jail for a few months.
    It never will stop, until we can be ruthless and deliberate. The way things look to me now, it will only be worse in future generations.
  • US Military GuyUS Military Guy Member Posts: 3,645 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    You don't need dog catchers, if you don't have stray dogs.

    If you eliminate all of the stray dogs, what will the dog catchers do?

    [;)]
  • mjrfd99mjrfd99 Member Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by fideau
    We are all saying the same thing. But it will not happen.
    If you outlaw gangs for instance, round them up, kill them if they resist, life in prison for being a member, or selling drugs, you can eliminate gangs. BUT, lawyers, ACLU, Libturd judges, Dimocrap lawmakers, the crap news media, etc., will be up in arms screaming to high heaven about their "rights". "Rights" to be criminals, killers, and drug dealers I guess, until millions of dollars and years of investigations might put them in jail for a few months.
    It never will stop, until we can be ruthless and deliberate. The way things look to me now, it will only be worse in future generations.

    Letting the armed scum out on bail everyday in NJ. Another failed demonrat dump.
    http://njbailreformfail.com/
    The scum re-offends in a day or 2
    The judges who let them out should be held accountable.
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,529 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by US Military Guy
    You don't need dog catchers, if you don't have stray dogs.

    If you eliminate all of the stray dogs, what will the dog catchers do?

    [;)]


    Go catch some cats [:D]
  • p3skykingp3skyking Member Posts: 23,916 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    That seems like a big inconvenience to me.

    Why not just kill all the Muslims?
  • eastbankeastbank Member Posts: 4,052 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    in the no win war i was involved in, the enemy would just craw into another country when we got close and the politions didn,t have the balls to go in after them most of the time. i remember the WIN THEIR HEARTS AND MINDS phase of the war. it should have been SCREW THEIR MINDS AND BURY THEIR HEARTS. they should get a big enough helping of war,so they will not want any more. its sad to say but they don,t fear us and we will not do what may be needed and that may be going after their familes and pets and killing them too. mr myopic.
  • WulfmannWulfmann Member Posts: 4,906 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    This is wack-a-mole

    Putting in security check points at an event 50,000 people show up for will still have a choke point where a suicide bomber will detonate himself. Likely the security check point will become the new danger place.
    3YUCmbB.jpg
    "Fools learn from their own mistakes. I learn from the mistakes of others"
    Otto von Bismarck
  • Chief ShawayChief Shaway Member, Moderator Posts: 6,289 ******
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Wulfmann
    This is wack-a-mole

    Putting in security check points at an event 50,000 people show up for will still have a choke point where a suicide bomber will detonate himself. Likely the security check point will become the new danger place.




    True.
    Ever think about at the airport, when people have over 3 ounces of shampoo?
    What does security do with it?
    Throw it in a bin with all of the other bottles over 3 ounces.
    It's like saying, we don't want the plane to blow up but, this checkpoint, yeah, it's ok if it blows up.
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,695 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Obviously it is whack-a-mole, and will be for the foreseeable future. The Muslim religion is in dire need of a universal reformation that unequivocally states that Jihad is anti-God.

    It is what a religion of peace would do, but would create a lot of problems in cultures (sic) that practice the exclusionary and sometimes brutal remedies endemic in much of the faith currently.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • US Military GuyUS Military Guy Member Posts: 3,645 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by select-fire
    quote:Originally posted by US Military Guy
    You don't need dog catchers, if you don't have stray dogs.

    If you eliminate all of the stray dogs, what will the dog catchers do?

    [;)]


    Go catch some cats [:D]


    You don't catch cats. You herd them. [:D]
  • truthfultruthful Member Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    We know where they are. They have no armored vehicles. They have no navy. They have no air force. They have few factories producing munitions and we know where those are. Yet, we cannot defeat them, or refuse to.
Sign In or Register to comment.