In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Man posts how he voted more than once
select-fire
Member Posts: 69,524 ✭✭✭✭
Comments
Where exactly can someone walk in and vote without showing any kind of identification?
How does that work exactly? When I go to vote, I have to show my driver's license, which they cross reference with the registration files.
Where exactly can someone walk in and vote without showing any kind of identification?
In Nevada for one!
Every time I go in to Vote, I hold up my drivers License. they always say that I don't need to show it. I say, "I insist".
I particularly enjoyed the lizard's moniker; Yurasis A. Draggen.
How does that work exactly? When I go to vote, I have to show my driver's license, which they cross reference with the registration files.
Where exactly can someone walk in and vote without showing any kind of identification?
Apparently in NC. My polling place is pretty strict here in VA, I am guessing in urban areas they aren't strict about asking for ID.
NC doesn't even require ID to register a car or proof of citizenship to issue a DL.
Oddly, most people found it wonderful she was participating, including Repukelickins. It ain't got a damn bit better since then.
Union Teachers in Public Schools have made AmeriKa STUPID. TV keeps em stupid.
If the state has a DEMOCRAT AG, the perp knows he will not be prosecuted.
Who votes in a presidential election is for the most part left up to the states. ID, residency requirements,etc. So far as I know, there is no federal law which states "if you vote in one state you can not vote in another". And there are many states that do not specifically have that same restriction. What prevents most people from legally voting in more than one state in the same federal election is residency requirements.
Depending on wording & definition, if you found a state that referenced "residing in" and the definition didn't mean "resident of" I think it could be pulled off, legally.
Sttat Election Laws are very limited as well, and many have been modified by Federal Courts since 1950. Ergo, Residency, Poll Tax and even literacy have been eliminated from the qualification to vote.
The cute part is States have for the most part shoved election cost, staffing and enforcement onto the Counties. When it comes to enforcement of Voting Laws and Registration, the County bears 100% of the cost. Violation of most election Law is a Civil matter, and most of what isn't Civil is Misdemeanor level crime. That boils down to County taxpayers paying a County Attorney, not to be confused with the District Attorney, to bring suit against the offender. Oddly, most Counties fail to fund such efforts.
When it comes to Presidential Elections, the fun really begins. In 1982, Team R had cleverly built a method of kicking fake voters and dead voters off the Election Rolls. It worked so well Team D hauled team R into Federal Court, and Team R crapped its collective suits.
What followed is loosely called the 82 Decree.
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed "ballot security" programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. Most recently, in late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the Republican National Committee had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the Republican National Committee asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision.
https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree
Translation- Team D does as it wants, and Team R can't do spit about it. The situation continues until today.
Team Clintron is already hauling Team R into Court because The Donald Intimidates D Snowflakes