6x40 or 3x9x40

quamnet

I was wondering which scope would be better to mount on my AK, I would use it for hunting. (6x40 or 3x9x40) Both are in the same price range and both are made by Leapers. Thanks

Der Gebirgsjager

You didn't tell us the circumstances under which you'd be hunting, so I offer two conflicting opinions. Take the one that fits your plans: (1) Were I shooting in brush or forest, I'd choose a fixed power for the wider field of view and the ability to more rapidly pick up running game. My personal choice would be a 4x. (2) Were I shooting in more open areas I'd choose the 3x-9x for versatility. If you're planning to hunt in both situations, then the 3x-9x is the choice.

quamnet

Thanks for the feedback....actually I would be hunting in both circumstances.

ghotie_thumper

The 3x9 is more versatile for close shots in dense timber. A fixed 4 power is a good all around choice. My daughter's 257 Roberts has a 4x leupold on it and it will shoot sub inch groups all day at a measured 100yds. The fixed power scopes generally give you a wider field of view than a variable will at the same power setting. 6x may not focus at short distances that may be encountered in heavy brush or timber. You might go look at a 2x7 leupold, compact and light.

DaRoosta

My opinion is that it's nice to have a low-power option for dense hunting areas. It's easier to pick up your target. All my hunting rifles have variable scopes. I dial them down to the miniumum when I'm hunting in dense cover; if I need the higher power for a little bit longer shot, I dial it up. Anything between 2-7 and 3.5-10 is a good choice.