In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

"forging marks" revisited

metalsmitty45metalsmitty45 Member Posts: 83 ✭✭
edited January 2016 in Ask the Experts
A while back I showed a couple vintage 1894/1892 receivers to a friend that works for a well known forging company .They have distinct flowing marks that people refer to as forging marks.
He replied those are the flowing grain lines of a coarse grained steel that over time oxidation and deterioration has revieled them.

Examing a broken bolt recently showed very coarse internal structure.
Here is a couple cross sections of forged parts acid etched to show grain.Any thoughts from the experts?

fg0215-grain-fig1-615_zpsk1mlbdce.jpg
37_zpsiqkolemc.jpg

Comments

  • Options
    perry shooterperry shooter Member Posts: 17,390
    edited November -1
    very interesting Thanks
  • Options
    charliemeyer007charliemeyer007 Member Posts: 6,579 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Mass production metallurgy and heat treatment, ok after the 30's. Somewhat hit or miss in the 10's and 20's.
  • Options
    metalsmitty45metalsmitty45 Member Posts: 83 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think mostly due to lack of refinements
    To the steel .Coarse grain steel is usually easier to machine in mass production.Forging during that era should have been good.When new and freshly polished and blued theses lines are not seen.I have a restoration 1892 that after carbona bluing the lines show up as darker streaks .There is a early 1894 rifle on GunBroker now that was factory refinished and shows the darker streaks.
  • Options
    XXCrossXXCross Member Posts: 1,379 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Forging lines wreck havoc on your nerves,but damage little else.
  • Options
    metalsmitty45metalsmitty45 Member Posts: 83 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Mainly what I'm getting at is calling these lines forging lines is not exactly correct because they are not caused by the forging process. Forging only contibutes to there orientation or flow and that's based on the open or closed dies that are used to make the rough shape.The steel is not layered ,Winchester would have used a solid ingot of steel placed on a forging hammer or press and hammered or squeezed the ingot into more than likely an open die technique to make the rough receiver.
    Some collectors have said these lines were folds of metal which I do not believe.

    Forging receivers would not have required layering of the steel , just simply a grain orientated rough shape for added strength,same as today's techniques other than today closed dies are used .
  • Options
    metalsmitty45metalsmitty45 Member Posts: 83 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    some pics of one receiver I have thats good representative.

    0120160630_zpsugotesg7.jpg

    0119161438_zpslerhbnzr.jpg

    0120160629a_zpsoiilwlfp.jpg
  • Options
    spiritsspirits Member Posts: 363 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    At least it is just forging lines in the metal not voids (i.e., cavities in the metal). Some forging voids even show up at the surface where the metal gets folded.
Sign In or Register to comment.