In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
scope ignorance
shilowar
Member Posts: 38,811 ✭✭✭
Is a Redfield 2x-7x a good quality scope? How about compared to a Nikon Prostaff 3x9x40? Mounted on a 30-06 bolt gun M77 or 700 BDL
I would use it for 300-400 yards or in...I guess my point was that any shooting of it would be less than...I should have said 100-200 yds.
I would use it for 300-400 yards or in...I guess my point was that any shooting of it would be less than...I should have said 100-200 yds.
Comments
I think they are good scopes - certainly an excellent value for the money - but have no basis to compare them with the Nikon (other than the power difference). Believe they make the Redfield in a 3X9 also (?).
If I need another 2X7, I would look first at the Redfields.
If it had to be of the two you suggested, it would be the 3-9x Pro-Staff, just for the extra magnification. If it were mine, I would be going to a Burris 4.5-14 Full Field II.
I rifle will only shoot as good as you can see.
Best
In reference to power needed to make accurate long range shots, I'll just add that quite a few indigenous SE Asians discovered that 9X was good enough at long range.
If you can live without a scope till the fall hunting season save another hundred or two and buy the best glass you can almost afford. It will pay for itself over the years in durability and extending the shooting day. (Burris and Leupold are at best second tier, but only JustC can afford Nightforce.[}:)])
Maybe I'm a "wuss", but I'm of the opinion that hitting ANYTHING at 400 yards is tough, and making a good hit at 300 isn't trivial either.
If we're talking about ordinary hunting, the vast majority of hunting shots occur at distances under 200 yards (often way under) and either a 2-7x or a 3-9x is plenty good for that kind of shooting.
Remember, for centuries people have hunted deer/hogs/bear/etc successfully with iron sights and (gasp!) there are even those who STILL do it. Others are hunting with handguns with fixed 2 or 3x glass, and still others are using bows and arrows with zero magnification. So to my mind, a variable power scope that gets up to 7x ought to be plenty except under fairly unusual circumstances.
I'd even go so far as to say that for typical deer hunting in wooded areas, the LOWEST magnification is more important than the highest one, because 70 yard shots are more probable than 200+ yard ones.
So long as you're careful to start low and then increase your magnification as necessary, it can't hurt to have 9x (or more), but that kind of magnification is probably more applicable to varmint hunting or open-plains style hunting where longer range shots are more common, or long range target shooting.
Back in the early 80's I had a 3x9 Redfield widefield on my Winchester 25/06. I used mostly handloads but killed more than one deer at 400+ yds. The old "made in Denver" Redfields were very fine scopes. You can find them on the auction side,but you have no warranty. I recently bought two of the 3x9s. I live in So.Tx where we hunt long roads so there are lots of opportunity for those long shots.
Its an older Redfield on an older Ruger M77 that I was looking at.
I own few of the old model redfields on old model guns but would not purposely own a old model redfield scope. If it's on a gun I would only allow about $50 for such because if it fogs the after market repair cost is too much to put into a old redfield USUALLY.
Although some of the old low pro and rangefinding types are collectables and resell at good price if not scrathed and beat up.
I seen one few years ago that would not hold zero on a 30:06, sent it too redfield and it came back from factory right when they were going out of business with same issue.
The Leupold VXII line of scopes is a real good scope (also unlimited lifetime warrenty even on a used one) and the glass clarity seems to be as good as the old model XIII's.
The Leupold Rifleman series of scopes sucks big air.
The old model XIII's are good scopes with lifetime warrenty but I've heard rumors that the factory does not repairs the old model 3.5x10's and has a trade in offer to upgrade to a VX series at fair prices. Leupold has top of the line customer service and customer relations and is AMERICAN MADE.
In the Nikon series of scopes starting at the low end is Prostaff, then Buckmasters, then Monarch.
The buckmaster's seem to have good clarity and most monarchs, even the old models are ususally ok, but NIKON customer Service/Customer Relations SUCK BIG AIR. If you are not the original owner, etc, you are usually SOL unless you are a good liar when communication with them.
In a used scope a very good top of the line scope that is REALLY REALLY GOOD is the old model Bausch and Lomb. (but no warrenty because Bushnell bought B&L scope line few years ago)
I'm not a fan of Bushnell, mainly because of the hassell of communicating with them and if you ever have to send them anything for warrenty repairs, insure it and get a delivery confirm. They lose stuff quite often.
I own couple of Bushnell elite series of scopes which copy the B&L line of scopes with the good glass, etc that was on used guns I bought, but I normally stay away from Bushnell and don't buy bushnell due to poor customer service.
I don't own any Burris scopes mainly bacause they have left a bad taste in my mouth couple times, not answering technical questions on-line or not returning phone calls at ALL, therefore I don't buy or recommend their products.
If a company has poor customer service/customer realtions depts I don't do any business with them and they go on my list permanently and i pass the word.
My suggestion: Look towards Leupold VXII line of scopes.
A real good scope that can be found used at a reasonable price with careful shopping is the old line of Leupold XIII 2.5x8 scopes. (unlimited lifetime warrenty also)
People just seem to look past this scope on GB and ebay.
JMHO....
JIM..........................
Either the Redfield or Nikon are useable scopes. Not the greatest range or flexibility, but certainly useable.