In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
1:7 twist AR15 20" barrel handload..
JustC
Member Posts: 16,056 ✭✭✭
Anyone have a good handload recipe for a 1:7 twist barrel on an AR? If not, what weight and brand of factory ammo have you found to group well at distance?
A great rifle with a junk scope,....is junk.
A great rifle with a junk scope,....is junk.
Comments
Most of my 1/7 barrels shoot well with anything from 50 grain bullets on up.
Varget works well.
What is it for,Competion,Fun,Predators?
cpermd
My testing is done on paper to acheive the best grouping, and from there, I would proceed to the moving variety.
Is there a difference I should look at if I am going to shoot a groundhog or fox rather than paper? I am sure that I will need a length tolerant bullet if I wish to feed them from the magazine. Have you ever used the VLD bullets? do they group better than the LT bullets? Which direction would you suggest I head for a start?
Thanks.
A great rifle with a junk scope,....is junk.
I have used Varget,RE-15 and 4895 starting at 24 grains and work UP.
Speer or Sierra bullets.
These will all kill coyotes at 450 yds with good glass.
Do you have a micrometer?
Being sort of retired does have some advantages.
I just wish it wasn't a stroke that brought it on.
cpermd
I have a stainless RCBS caliper, case prep center, digital scale, rock chucker press for resizing, partner press for seating (not as strong as rockchucker), competition adjustable dies, trim pro case trimmer, and a bunch of other goodies. I assume you are going to tell me something about OAL and it's relation to this type design of rifle? That is part of why I inquired about the Very Low Drag bullets. I am sure they will not fit the magazine if I were to seat them at rifling depth. The Length Tolerant Bullets can be had in the same weights, but I have a feeling they wouldn't group as well as the LONG VLD's, due to the increased balistic coefficient of the longer projectiles.
Any suggestions would be much appreciated. thanks for your time already.
A great rifle with a junk scope,....is junk.
That is the only reason they went to that twist.
1/9 - 1/10 is optimal.
Shoot them and see.
Don't believe all the Book stuff.
cpermd
Also, what was the original rifling of the ealier M16 before they went to the 1/7 twist?
If I'm wrong please correct me, I won't be offended.
69-78 will shoot well in a 1/9'esp at 600.
C-Start by seating 0.010 from the lands
cpermd
leeblackman, I would think a 75gr might be a tad heavy for a 1:9 barrel, but as cpermd stated, try it and see. I will be experimenting with all of the bullet weights based on his recomendation. Now for a 600yd shoot, if you were to compete for groups, I would think for windage resistance, you will be better served with a heavier and longer bullet. The lighter ones will group, but as they lose energy over distance, they will be affected by the wind more so than the heavy loads. You may find that out to a certain distance, the light bullets group better, and after a certain distance, the longer heavy bullets will stabilize and group up better against the resistance. Just my preliminary knowledge, as I said, based on someone's recommendation who has more experience than me with this rifle, I will be trying all weights.
The original barrels were 1:12
after the WARSAW pack, they were mandated at 1:9
and the 1:7, as previously stated, are for the long tracer rounds.
A great rifle with a junk scope,....is junk.