In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
1886 Winchester
deerhide
Member Posts: 224 ✭✭✭
Bert;
Sorry about replying in this forum, the comp with your address crashed.
Re. my '86, serial number 134150 with suffix A.
Cody letter says: carbine, 45-70,
rec'd in warehouse May 18/05,
rec'd in warehouse Sept.25/05 Lyman front sight and sights fitted, shipped Sept. 26/05,
order number 26591-A
I haven't been able to find out if all '86 carbines had the saddle ring and strap studs (mine has both). I thought maybe the Cody letter would perhaps mention that sort of detail.
I don't know if the rear sight is a 'correct' one but it is a flip -back type(about 1 and 1/2 inches tall) but has no yard markings on it.
I am well pleased with the Cody letter, it and the local history of this Winchester go together well. At some point I will be able to have pictures to show how it 'aged' in northern Canada.
Regards,
Jim Purdy
Sorry about replying in this forum, the comp with your address crashed.
Re. my '86, serial number 134150 with suffix A.
Cody letter says: carbine, 45-70,
rec'd in warehouse May 18/05,
rec'd in warehouse Sept.25/05 Lyman front sight and sights fitted, shipped Sept. 26/05,
order number 26591-A
I haven't been able to find out if all '86 carbines had the saddle ring and strap studs (mine has both). I thought maybe the Cody letter would perhaps mention that sort of detail.
I don't know if the rear sight is a 'correct' one but it is a flip -back type(about 1 and 1/2 inches tall) but has no yard markings on it.
I am well pleased with the Cody letter, it and the local history of this Winchester go together well. At some point I will be able to have pictures to show how it 'aged' in northern Canada.
Regards,
Jim Purdy
Comments
I have a 1886 Winchester in .45-70. It is in good shape; however when the gun is cocked to the second position (safety), pulling the trigger will cause the hammer to fall. I'm sure that it is not supposed to be that way (although I don't think there is enough force to cause a cartridge to fire). On inspection the hammer looks good and does not appear to be worn (although I did not remove it). Any suggestions?
thanks
Jim
Serial number applied on 4-2-1898
Date In: 4-12-1898
Type: rifle
Caliber: 38/56
Barrel Shape: octagon
Trigger: plain
Date Shipped: 4-1-1899
Order Number: 25465
As poor of condition as this rifle (though no pitting), I would like to bring it back as close to original condition as possible with the only variations being for practical use. I had hoped the historical data would have indicated barrel length and/or magazine tube configuration (as well as where it shipped to), but, since it doesn't, I will have to figure out what length it might likely have shipped with. Since I don't know exactly how it shipped, I can't very well return it to it's exact original condition, so I'm thinking about not returning it to .38-56. The .38-56 caliber, in factory loadings, is expensive and hard to find. With .38-56 WCF all but out of the running, I am considering a few others. .45-70 is practical, easy to reload for, and I already have a Marlin in this caliber. .45-90 would be a bit more interesting in the 1886, but it would be unlikely I would actually bother reloading it, so I would end up using .45-70 in it and probably getting a little less accuracy than if it were reamed for .45-70. .50-110 would be a great conversation piece, and probably worth reloading for when I take this rifle hunting, but otherwise very expensive and not the most practical. I have always admired Turnbull's restoration work, but I can't see putting that kind of money into a rifle that I am neither selling nor making a safe queen. I have been looking at Hunter Restorations lately, and have seen a few people post their high regards for the owner. His work looks good and starts at half the price of Turnbull's. I realize that I may get what I pay for, but the few photos I have found look good, and with a base rifle that was free, it would probably be worth having it semi-"restored." I am looking at keeping the three-leaf express sight on whatever new barrel I go with, as I think it is pretty neat. Any advice and recommendations would be greatly appreciated, as I know there is a lot of knowledge here. Thanks.
The Model 1886 Carbines were all equipped with the saddle ring unless specifically ordered without it. The sling eyes were a special order item, and if they were factory installed, that feature would (or should) have been listed on the Cody factory letter.
When you get the chance, please post pictures of it.
WACA Historian & Life Member
What you posted is not germane to the question at hand. The question is specifically related to the "Carbine" variant of the Model 1886.
WACA Historian & Life Member