In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
what do I have here? pictures posted!
deerodgers
Member Posts: 44 ✭✭
I was just handed an old gun that I would like some clarification on please! On the right side of the lockplate it says C. SHARPS PAT OCT 5th 1852 and right above the lock on the same side it has H.S. LAWRENCE PAT APRIL 12TH 1859. Stamped on the top of the receiver tang is number 65715. It has a slide loop with a ring on the stock on one side that I assume was a sling mount or a saddle ring. Any ideas of a value or history of this gun? the barrel has some pitting, nothing deep. There is a metal piece on the end of the butt that is missing. Other than that the sights are in place, mechanism appears to work well
Comments
EDIT #1,
Instructions for posting photos, at this link.
http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=259294
Photos of Sharp's Civil War Carbine, off the net.
Many were converted from paper cartridge percussion breechloaders (I like the British term, "capping breechloader.") to cartridge. Mostly .50-70 centerfire, a few to .52 rimfire.
Almost surely used to shoot at us Fine Southern Gentlemen. Unless one of the few sold to the Fine State of Georgia.
Or maybe at Indians. A friend has a .50-70 conversion that is about MOA accurate; Minute of Apache.
The serial number is in the 1859 range but it lacks the patch box as shown on rufe's.
I cannot see the hammer and breechblock area well enough to tell if it is still percussion or a cartridge conversion. But replacement buttstocks without patchboxes were used if one was needed at the time of conversion. Or probably for repairs during the War.
Thanks. Sure looks like the hammer is hitting a firing pin, making this one of the many Sharps conversions to conventional brass cased cartridges after the War. The plain stock likely installed at the time.
I know of no way to track individual issue of smallarms, but it has been done although rarely.