In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Belt Fed AR-15 / M-16

riggsmlriggsml Member Posts: 6 ✭✭
edited June 2002 in Ask the Experts
A few months back I saw an advertisement for a group making belt fed uppers for the AR-15/M16. Have never seen anything more on it and cannot find anything on the internet.

Does anyone know who is making this upper? Links to internet, ads, reviews, phone-numbers, etc.? Furthermore, what is the legality of having a belt fed upper for an AR-15? Thanks.

Comments

  • Tailgunner1954Tailgunner1954 Member Posts: 7,734 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I found it mentioned on another forum, the first is the reply quote and the URL is the thread (thread is about a Gibbs 45-70 rifle), but at least it gives you a name to work with.

    This rifle is the biggest tease in Internet history (next to the Shrike beltfed AR-15 upper)!

    http://www.serveroptions.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=38;t=000254

    Some guys like a mag full of lead, I still prefer one round to the head.
  • kimberkidkimberkid Member Posts: 8,858 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Last month in one of the issues of ShotGun News someone was offering a beltfed MG42 conversion that used an M-16 lower, was also going to offer some for the semi-auto ... price was around $3800 ... It seems that they already had BTAF approval, and it was concidered a non-gun since you use the receiver/fire control group of the M-16/AR-15 is the controlled part

    =================================
    The only bad thing about choosing a Kimber ...
    ... there are so darn many models to choose from!
    kimberkid@gunbroker.zzn.com
    If you really desire something, you'll find a way ?
    ? otherwise, you'll find an excuse.
  • GreenLanternGreenLantern Member Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think it was an MG34 w/ an AR15 lower, wasn't it? I think you have the price right though. The ad also said they were building 250 semi-auto MG42s, going for $4200-4600. If it was me I'd rather have the MG42 given the small (somewhat) difference price. Maybe swap out the barrel for a post-war MG42/MG3 barrel in 7.62x51. Now, time to go out and water that money tree I planted last year!!



    Edited by - GreenLantern on 06/24/2002 20:49:06
  • kimberkidkimberkid Member Posts: 8,858 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    GL - When I was posting I couldn't remember for sure, so I looked it up again ... They are calling it the XMG Belt Fed AR/M16 ... we were both right ad says it uses MG34 and MG42 parts ... kinda confusing, so here's the ad ...




    =================================
    The only bad thing about choosing a Kimber ...
    ... there are so darn many models to choose from!
    kimberkid@gunbroker.zzn.com
    If you really desire something, you'll find a way ?
    ? otherwise, you'll find an excuse.
  • GreenLanternGreenLantern Member Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Right you were kimberkid. Also see I was wrong on the MG42 price. In a good way for once
Sign In or Register to comment.