In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Winchester 73 unusual

tlabefftlabeff Member Posts: 6 ✭✭
edited October 2013 in Ask the Experts
Hello Gentlemen..I've recently been asked to help with an estate containing a rather large collection of Winchester rifles..there is one rifle in the collection that has me a bit confused as to what it is and how to handle it within the collection...the rifle in question looks to be a very early 1873 winchester first model without any serial numbers present, the address stamp on the barrel appears to be very early that reads "HENRY WINCHESTER RIFLE MOD 1873" but is not mentioned in any of the books I have..there are some proof stamps on the side plate that are unusual..how should I handle this rifle as too its history with no serial numbers?

I'm sorry I'm having trouble figureing out how to post pictures here.

Comments

  • rufe-snowrufe-snow Member Posts: 18,650 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Quality close-up photos needed, for accurate identification and valuation.

    Instructions for posting photos, at this link.


    http://forums.GunBroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=259294
  • Bert H.Bert H. Member Posts: 11,281 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hello,

    All original Winchester Model 1873 Rifles, Carbines and Muskets were serialized (on the lower tang, behind the lever bow).

    The marking you describe on the barrel is not correct, nor was it ever used by Winchester.

    I suspect that the gun in question is an altered original Winchester, or that it is some type of a reproduction.

    You can send pictures of it to me at Win1885@msn.com

    WACA Historian & Life Member

  • tlabefftlabeff Member Posts: 6 ✭✭
    edited November -1
  • tlabefftlabeff Member Posts: 6 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Bert....I sent pictures to your email perhaps you can help me....photo bucket is not cooperating with me
  • rufe-snowrufe-snow Member Posts: 18,650 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Very Interesting rifle. It gives the appearance of great age and being an authentic replica. The proof marks appear to be Belgian to me. The type that were required in the 1870's/80's time frame. Before their proof laws and regulations were revised for modern firearms.


    photo1_zps99784161.jpg
  • tlabefftlabeff Member Posts: 6 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    photo6_zpsadf8b7fd.jpg.html?filters[user]=137848264&filters[recent]=1&sort=1&o=0
    one more interesting thing....there is a brass plate fixed to the butt of the rifle that says Ernest de Schoenowsky with a crown engraved center of the plaque....if this is a reproduction its a darn good one....holding it up against another 1st model 73 carbine I can't tell a difference with the exception of lack of serial number....were any of these guns made in Europe?
  • rufe-snowrufe-snow Member Posts: 18,650 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by tlabeff
    photo6_zpsadf8b7fd.jpg.html?filters[user]=137848264&filters[recent]=1&sort=1&o=0
    one more interesting thing....there is a brass plate fixed to the butt of the rifle that says Ernest de Schoenowsky with a crown engraved center of the plaque....if this is a reproduction its a darn good one....holding it up against another 1st model 73 carbine I can't tell a difference with the exception of lack of serial number....were any of these guns made in Europe?



    Looks like a presentation plaque to me. If I were you I would research this Ernest de Schoenowsky, to the best of your ability. Even if you have to pay somebody, who is fluent in European languages to do it. If Ernie was a famous guy on the other side of the pond, and this replica 73 can be tied to him. It might be worth a lot of bucks, specially to a European collector.



    photo6_zpsadf8b7fd.jpg
  • Spider7115Spider7115 Member Posts: 29,704 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by tlabeff
    photo1_zps99784161.jpg.html
    photo2_zps9f12b79d.jpg.html
    photo5_zps71f8a85a.jpg.html


    Here you go:

    photo2_zps9f12b79d.jpg
    photo1_zps99784161.jpg
    photo4_zps0fa96d89.jpg
    photo3_zps0a44464b.jpg
    photo5_zps71f8a85a.jpg
    photo6_zpsadf8b7fd.jpg
  • hrfhrf Member Posts: 857 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    A mark on the removable side plate wouldn't be a proof mark, more likely the maker or retailer.

    European proof marks would be on the barrel, probably hidden by the forend.

    The Belgian maker Emile Bernard used a crown over EB in oval mark.
  • tlabefftlabeff Member Posts: 6 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    from what I've found just doing a search for Ernest de Schnowsky reveals either Austrian nobility or muster roles for Ernest de Schnowsky Lt. Col. for the Belgian Army in the mid 1850s....thanks to every one your knowledge is invaluable...
Sign In or Register to comment.