In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

357 vs 44 special

ker2222ker2222 Member Posts: 188 ✭✭✭
edited April 2004 in Ask the Experts
I am looking to pick-up a small revolver for conceal carry and protection while hiking/camping/hunting. I had it narrowed down to a few models of 357 revolver when a friend recomended a revolver in 44 special. I always thought the 357 offered more penetration and more knock down power than a 44 special. Am I wrong?????

Comments

  • gap1916gap1916 Member Posts: 4,977
    edited November -1
    You are not wrong. A .357 mag is more powerful than the .44 special. In a short barrel hand gun 2 - 2.5 inches the .44special may hve an edge on the .357mag. My 2 cents [8D]

    Greg
    Former Marine
    A N G L I C O
  • XracerXracer Member Posts: 1,990
    edited November -1
    In a snubbie revolver, the .357 will have more penetration, but they'll both have about the same stopping power.

    Either caliber, in a small revolver, is a fistful of recoil....but either one will do the job.
  • ern98ern98 Member Posts: 1,725 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Odd are that the 357 can be had in a smaller package overall, not just barrel length, thus making it an easier carry.
  • rsnyder55rsnyder55 Member Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    For same size, a 357 mag will probably hold six shots vs. five for a 44 special.
  • Contender ManContender Man Member Posts: 2,110 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Smith M-60 in 357 provides a 5 round capacity in a very compact package, and the difference in performance between 357 and 44 spec. is not all that significant.


    2470099-S.jpg
    If you only have time to do two things so-so, or one thing well ... do the one thing!
  • Jake_S-83Jake_S-83 Member Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    unless you were in like bear/werewolf/bigfoot country, i would go with a 357. that stubby 44 will beat the crap out of you. [:D]
  • torquimatatorquimata Member Posts: 200 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    357 w 110 grainers is what i use in my s&w 60,would think the hydrostatic shock would be way better than a slow,unlikely to expand 44!
  • drygulchstandrygulchstan Member Posts: 321 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    more 357 ammo out there than 44 special also
  • slyboneyslyboney Member Posts: 18 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    If I had to make a choice I`d go with the .44 special, but I`m
    partial to heavy calibers. I`d rather throw a rock instead of
    stone.I`m not saying that the .357 is inadequate for the job,but
    over penetration might be a concern in certain environments. Recoil
    on the .44 spl.as compared to the .357 should be plenty managable.
    There is plenty of .44 special ammo out there and its cheaper than
    the .357. Hey,heres an idea! How about a .44 mag. It gives you the
    flexibility to use the .44spl. as a personal defence round or the magnum round if you really have to get nasty if the situation warrants.With the proper holster, conceal carry should not be a problem.
  • rsnyder55rsnyder55 Member Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    My personal carry while hiking and camping is a S&W 629 Backpacker. 3" 44 mag.
  • DONDALINGERDONDALINGER Member Posts: 1,541 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I say go with the .44 Special any day. I own both the .44 and the .357 and I opt for the .44 every time. I can shoot it more accurately and I favor the bigger rounds. The other guy has a good point. Get the .44 mag and you have more versatility. I am partial to the .44 Special just as Elmer Keith was. Just my opinion.
  • XracerXracer Member Posts: 1,990
    edited November -1
    Here's a little sweetie with a BIG attitude!

    http://www.charterfirearms.com/bulldog.php
Sign In or Register to comment.