In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Kel-Tec Sub 2000 9mm or Mec Tech CCU 45?
rballi
Member Posts: 770 ✭✭✭✭
I've got the itch for a hand gun caliber carbine and would like opinions on my two choices. I am looking at the Kel-Tec Sub 2000 9mm carbine that folds up, is mostly plastic and is $329 locally. I am also thinking about the Mec-Tech CCU 45 carbine conversion that uses a 1911 lower and comes like a flat top for around $300. I'm thinking about using my Colt Sistema Argentine lower for the CCU 45. The Sub 2000 comes with fixed sights. The CCU 45 comes flat with optional fixed sight rail or you can mount a red dot on it.
Opinions, Pros, and Cons are appreciated.
Roy
Opinions, Pros, and Cons are appreciated.
Roy
Comments
After a lot of work, I was able to get several USA and Triple-K 30-round magazines to work in my Kel-Tec Sub-9 and I kind if feel like I have an "assault rifle" in a brief case. You can leave the loaded magazine in the rifle while folded if you desire. All you have to do then is unfold the rifle, allow the bolt to close and chamber a round, and you are ready to fire. That feature is the reason I chose the Sub-9. The 2000 is basically the same, but about half the cost. The only bad thing about the 2000 is that the bolt does not stay open on the last shot. Of course, that does not bother H-K M91/93 owners.
If I cannot have the folding feature of the Kel-Tec, I would just as soon have a .223 Colt Carbine over a Camp 9 for about the same size and weight.
Thanks
Chris8161
Admit nothing, deny everything, demand proof!